Libertarians Are The True Political Moderates

HUH?

Try again, this time in English.
That was English actually. He could have said it more plainly however.

Fair enough. I'll try again.

The concept of freedom, as promoted by libertarians, requires that we respect the rights of others. It means we give up the idea that we can push other people around for our benefit. Statists don't want to give up that power, which is why they despise libertarians.

The problem with Libertarianism is that it ignores reality, ignores that we are interdependent not independent. If would be nice if everyone could just do their own thing and live and let live, but it it doesn't work that way, and not because it's not a nice idea, but because it simply doesn't work. Society works, and for that you need a bit of go along to get along. It's cramps your style, which bothers me not at all...
 
That was English actually. He could have said it more plainly however.

I can translate.

He said liberty is bunk because in order to have liberty for all you have to willing to force authoritarian ass holes, like him, to agree, which goes against the tenant of no force.

Or said another way, the ass hole is trying to argue that liberty means the liberty to shove his fist up your ass and take your life for his pleasure. IOW he's an authoritarian ass hole democrat that bastardizes the meanings of words like liberty to his own pleasure.

???

heh... I guess I read your statements wrong :-)

I read "forfeiting the practice of bullying others for your convenience" as meaning liberty means giving in to the practice of bullying others as employed by authoritarians for some measure of security or convenience. As oppose, to liberty requires one to be willing to give up the practice of forcing others to bend to your will to achieve some desired ends.
 
Last edited:
That was English actually. He could have said it more plainly however.

Fair enough. I'll try again.

The concept of freedom, as promoted by libertarians, requires that we respect the rights of others. It means we give up the idea that we can push other people around for our benefit. Statists don't want to give up that power, which is why they despise libertarians.

The problem with Libertarianism is that it ignores reality, ignores that we are interdependent not independent.

No, it doesn't. It just requires that our interdependency is voluntary.
 
That was English actually. He could have said it more plainly however.

Fair enough. I'll try again.

The concept of freedom, as promoted by libertarians, requires that we respect the rights of others. It means we give up the idea that we can push other people around for our benefit. Statists don't want to give up that power, which is why they despise libertarians.

The problem with Libertarianism is that it ignores reality, ignores that we are interdependent not independent. If would be nice if everyone could just do their own thing and live and let live, but it it doesn't work that way, and not because it's not a nice idea, but because it simply doesn't work. Society works, and for that you need a bit of go along to get along. It's cramps your style, which bothers me not at all...

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, I see.

All this time I thought Bibi was sticking it to Hamas.

But I was wrong, according to you the whole affair is a .........lovefest?!?

.
 
Fair enough. I'll try again.

The concept of freedom, as promoted by libertarians, requires that we respect the rights of others. It means we give up the idea that we can push other people around for our benefit. Statists don't want to give up that power, which is why they despise libertarians.

The problem with Libertarianism is that it ignores reality, ignores that we are interdependent not independent. If would be nice if everyone could just do their own thing and live and let live, but it it doesn't work that way, and not because it's not a nice idea, but because it simply doesn't work. Society works, and for that you need a bit of go along to get along. It's cramps your style, which bothers me not at all...

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, I see.

All this time I thought Bibi was sticking it to Hamas.

But I was wrong, according to you the whole affair is a .........lovefest?!?
Israel without enemies couldn't get a cup of coffee at the White House, even if they offered to pay for it. They matter because we need oil and the Christians want Jesus back. Lovefest, hatefest, matters not a damn, without the other side you got nothin'.
 
That was English actually. He could have said it more plainly however.

Fair enough. I'll try again.

The concept of freedom, as promoted by libertarians, requires that we respect the rights of others. It means we give up the idea that we can push other people around for our benefit. Statists don't want to give up that power, which is why they despise libertarians.

The problem with Libertarianism is that it ignores reality, ignores that we are interdependent not independent. If would be nice if everyone could just do their own thing and live and let live, but it it doesn't work that way, and not because it's not a nice idea, but because it simply doesn't work. Society works, and for that you need a bit of go along to get along. It's cramps your style, which bothers me not at all...

Spoken like a true collectivist.
 
Libertarians want government limited to those functions which only government can do. .

Libertarians will get a little attention in 2016 when we find out they get about 1% of the GOP vote and the GOP will appease the lunatics enough that they'll show up and vote for the "lesser of two evils". That's what Ron Paul does. He rallies the base. The Libertarian party is the evil yet retarded step brother of the republicans.
 
The problem with Libertarianism is that it ignores reality, ignores that we are interdependent not independent. If would be nice if everyone could just do their own thing and live and let live, but it it doesn't work that way, and not because it's not a nice idea, but because it simply doesn't work. Society works, and for that you need a bit of go along to get along. It's cramps your style, which bothers me not at all...

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, I see.

All this time I thought Bibi was sticking it to Hamas.

But I was wrong, according to you the whole affair is a .........lovefest?!?
Israel without enemies couldn't get a cup of coffee at the White House, even if they offered to pay for it. They matter because we need oil and the Christians want Jesus back. Lovefest, hatefest, matters not a damn, without the other side you got nothin'.

As per usual you are contradicting yourself in many ways.

1 The Palestinian Holocaust should prove to you that the Palestinian Arabs ought to be armed with the biggest guns available regardless of the size of their penises;

2- You have failed or refused to point out how " interdependence" in helping Hamas and the Palestinian Arabs.

.
 
Fair enough. I'll try again.

The concept of freedom, as promoted by libertarians, requires that we respect the rights of others. It means we give up the idea that we can push other people around for our benefit. Statists don't want to give up that power, which is why they despise libertarians.

The problem with Libertarianism is that it ignores reality, ignores that we are interdependent not independent. If would be nice if everyone could just do their own thing and live and let live, but it it doesn't work that way, and not because it's not a nice idea, but because it simply doesn't work. Society works, and for that you need a bit of go along to get along. It's cramps your style, which bothers me not at all...

Spoken like a true collectivist.

He understands we are all in this together. We Are All in This Together, Economically | Thom Hartmann - News & info from the #1 progressive radio show
 
The problem with Libertarianism is that it ignores reality, ignores that we are interdependent not independent. If would be nice if everyone could just do their own thing and live and let live, but it it doesn't work that way, and not because it's not a nice idea, but because it simply doesn't work. Society works, and for that you need a bit of go along to get along. It's cramps your style, which bothers me not at all...

Spoken like a true collectivist.

He understands we are all in this together. We Are All in This Together, Economically | Thom Hartmann - News & info from the #1 progressive radio show

I'll burn everything I have before I let one of you moochers get one more dime out of me.
 
The problem with Libertarianism is that it ignores reality, ignores that we are interdependent not independent. If would be nice if everyone could just do their own thing and live and let live, but it it doesn't work that way, and not because it's not a nice idea, but because it simply doesn't work. Society works, and for that you need a bit of go along to get along. It's cramps your style, which bothers me not at all...

Spoken like a true collectivist.

He understands we are all in this together.

Yep, parasites love "togetherness"

th


.
 
That was English actually. He could have said it more plainly however.

Fair enough. I'll try again.

The concept of freedom, as promoted by libertarians, requires that we respect the rights of others. It means we give up the idea that we can push other people around for our benefit. Statists don't want to give up that power, which is why they despise libertarians.

The problem with Libertarianism is that it ignores reality, ignores that we are interdependent not independent. If would be nice if everyone could just do their own thing and live and let live, but it it doesn't work that way, and not because it's not a nice idea, but because it simply doesn't work. Society works, and for that you need a bit of go along to get along. It's cramps your style, which bothers me not at all...

A prime reason that no country on earth openly practices Libertarianism
 
Fair enough. I'll try again.

The concept of freedom, as promoted by libertarians, requires that we respect the rights of others. It means we give up the idea that we can push other people around for our benefit. Statists don't want to give up that power, which is why they despise libertarians.

The problem with Libertarianism is that it ignores reality, ignores that we are interdependent not independent.

No, it doesn't. It just requires that our interdependency is voluntary.

A prime reason why libertarianism is so ridiculous

I don't like schools ....so I don't want to pay for them
I don't like poor people....so I don't want to pay for them
I don't drive....so I won't pay for roads

Anarchy
 
The problem with Libertarianism is that it ignores reality, ignores that we are interdependent not independent.

No, it doesn't. It just requires that our interdependency is voluntary.

A prime reason why libertarianism is so ridiculous

I don't like schools ....so I don't want to pay for them
I don't like poor people....so I don't want to pay for them
I don't drive....so I won't pay for roads

Anarchy

Really? That's your definition of anarchy?

For fuck's sake, RW. Read a book.
 
The problem with Libertarianism is that it ignores reality, ignores that we are interdependent not independent.

No, it doesn't. It just requires that our interdependency is voluntary.

A prime reason why libertarianism is so ridiculous

I don't like schools ....so I don't want to pay for them
I don't like poor people....so I don't want to pay for them
I don't drive....so I won't pay for roads

Anarchy

:lol::lol::lol:
 
No, it doesn't. It just requires that our interdependency is voluntary.

A prime reason why libertarianism is so ridiculous

I don't like schools ....so I don't want to pay for them
I don't like poor people....so I don't want to pay for them
I don't drive....so I won't pay for roads

Anarchy

Really? That's your definition of anarchy?

For fuck's sake, RW. Read a book.

Yes, that is by definition....Anarchy

Every man for himself
 
Back
Top Bottom