Liberals say helpless children should not always be allowed the liberty to go on living

1miseryindex

Platinum Member
Nov 17, 2023
3,778
2,123
893
USA
Yes, all this talk about liberty vis a vis legalized abortion.

You know... Conservatives--dims say-- are against liberty since they are against women having the freedom to murder the unborn.

Liberty is for people in a certain age bracket!

Who knew?!


:uhoh3:
 
Democrats are horrible people.
yeh, and rain is wet :)

But they don't have toget many to vote for t hem, do they? Just fire up that old VAST Vote Fraud apparatus again (Thanks, briben confession!)

I have heard, however, that a lot of states have fixed their wacky voting procedures. Who knows how many have not?

But what if only, say, 10,000 people across the US voted for Corn pop Hair sniffer?

Then maybe there'd be hope even if the crooks tried to steal it again?
 
Yes, all this talk about liberty vis a vis legalized abortion.

You know... Conservatives--dims say-- are against liberty since they are against women having the freedom to murder the unborn.

Liberty is for people in a certain age bracket!

Who knew?!


:uhoh3:
Those women have a stupidity that only evil can give birth to.
Abortion in many countries now is hugely increasing women sold into slavery, kidnapping. rape etc. All because the gender imbalance is just terrible.
CHINA
"Pre-natal selection of children based on sex – condemned by the UN General Assembly as a “harmful practice” in 2019 – has been linked to increased violence against women and a growing demand for human trafficking."
 
Those women have a stupidity that only evil can give birth to.
Abortion in many countries now is hugely increasing women sold into slavery, kidnapping. rape etc. All because the gender imbalance is just terrible.
CHINA
"Pre-natal selection of children based on sex – condemned by the UN General Assembly as a “harmful practice” in 2019 – has been linked to increased violence against women and a growing demand for human trafficking."
you mean the UN actually did sometehing right? wow
 
Yes, all this talk about liberty vis a vis legalized abortion.

You know... Conservatives--dims say-- are against liberty since they are against women having the freedom to murder the unborn.

Liberty is for people in a certain age bracket!

Who knew?!


:uhoh3:
Dems are against forced birthers like you.
 
Yes, all this talk about liberty vis a vis legalized abortion.

You know... Conservatives--dims say-- are against liberty since they are against women having the freedom to murder the unborn.

Liberty is for people in a certain age bracket!

Who knew?!


:uhoh3:
When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, it claimed to be removing the judiciary from the abortion debate. In reality, it simply gave the courts a macabre new task: deciding how far states can push a patient toward death before allowing her to undergo an emergency abortion. On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit offered its own answer, declaring that Texas may prohibit hospitals from providing “stabilizing treatment” to pregnant patients by performing an abortion—withholding the procedure until their condition deteriorates to the point of grievous injury or near-certain death. The ruling proves what we already know: Roe’s demise has transformed the judiciary into a kind of death panel that holds the power to elevate the potential life of a fetus over the actual life of a patient.


And you post of liberty. You poor fuckup.
 
When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, it claimed to be removing the judiciary from the abortion debate. In reality, it simply gave the courts a macabre new task: deciding how far states can push a patient toward death before allowing her to undergo an emergency abortion. On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit offered its own answer, declaring that Texas may prohibit hospitals from providing “stabilizing treatment” to pregnant patients by performing an abortion—withholding the procedure until their condition deteriorates to the point of grievous injury or near-certain death. The ruling proves what we already know: Roe’s demise has transformed the judiciary into a kind of death panel that holds the power to elevate the potential life of a fetus over the actual life of a patient.
 
When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, it claimed to be removing the judiciary from the abortion debate. In reality, it simply gave the courts a macabre new task: deciding how far states can push a patient toward death before allowing her to undergo an emergency abortion. On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit offered its own answer, declaring that Texas may prohibit hospitals from providing “stabilizing treatment” to pregnant patients by performing an abortion—withholding the procedure until their condition deteriorates to the point of grievous injury or near-certain death. The ruling proves what we already know: Roe’s demise has transformed the judiciary into a kind of death panel that holds the power to elevate the potential life of a fetus over the actual life of a patient.


And you post of liberty. You poor fuckup.
No point in arguing with a fanatical Catholic.
 
Are you not a forced birther?
WTF does that mean?!? Are you asking me if I keep women hostage in my basement and force them to give birth to my bastard children of rape? Because the answer to that question is NO.
 
WTF does that mean?!? Are you asking me if I keep women hostage in my basement and force them to give birth to my bastard children of rape? Because the answer to that question is NO.
Hilarious


When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, it claimed to be removing the judiciary from the abortion debate. In reality, it simply gave the courts a macabre new task: deciding how far states can push a patient toward death before allowing her to undergo an emergency abortion. On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit offered its own answer, declaring that Texas may prohibit hospitals from providing “stabilizing treatment” to pregnant patients by performing an abortion—withholding the procedure until their condition deteriorates to the point of grievous injury or near-certain death. The ruling proves what we already know: Roe’s demise has transformed the judiciary into a kind of death panel that holds the power to elevate the potential life of a fetus over the actual life of a patient.
 
Hilarious


When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, it claimed to be removing the judiciary from the abortion debate. In reality, it simply gave the courts a macabre new task: deciding how far states can push a patient toward death before allowing her to undergo an emergency abortion. On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit offered its own answer, declaring that Texas may prohibit hospitals from providing “stabilizing treatment” to pregnant patients by performing an abortion—withholding the procedure until their condition deteriorates to the point of grievous injury or near-certain death. The ruling proves what we already know: Roe’s demise has transformed the judiciary into a kind of death panel that holds the power to elevate the potential life of a fetus over the actual life of a patient.
Kudos for the imagination! Of course, we all know what this is really about, and it is not the poor little lady who needs an emergency abortion to save her life.
 

Forum List

Back
Top