Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
According to liberals we should tax tall people since "you didnt grow that."According to conservative dogma giving a short person an extra box will act as a disincentive to short people and none will work to get tall.
Sometimes it seems so simple
.
Save me your dramaNo..That is not what you said.LOL....Pretty funny.
Sometimes it seems so simple
.
umm, we are NOT equal. We will never be equal.....
The laws of the land deem we receive equal treatment.....After that, we are on our own.
One of the things that makes this country great is the right and ability of each of us to do what we can to overcome our shortcomings.
You people want to take that ability away and place is all under the thumb of government to make sure that no one ever gets ahead of anyone else. \
Now, if there isn't anything else....
The concept is that you help those who need helping. Equality is not giving everyone the same amount of help
Old people may need help that younger people do not. Poor people need more help than the wealthy
You don't get to move the goal posts.
Your premise is that offering help should be mandatory and accomplished through confiscation.
Assistance ( you call it help as a means to engender sympathy) as your side conceptualizes it is not to lift those at the bottom, but to lower those at the top.
Conservatives= hand up....Liberal/progressives= hand out
Contributing to your church so they can buy a new organ that you will enjoy is not the same as contributing to starving families
Most churches in this country give a lot more to starving families than to buying a new organ each month. Your ridiculous bias is only too transparent.
They pay for magnificent buildings, salaries of their pastors, heat, utilities and yes, some goes to starving families. But just as much goes to spreading the faith which doesn't fill your belly
More of that bullshit where conservatives contribute to the churches they belong to?No I dont.
Wanna compare charitable contrubutions by conservatives vs liberals? Of course not. It makes you look stupid. Not that you need help there.
Charity is charity, does it matter what entity receives it?
Romney gave 29.4% of his income to charity in 2011.
Obama gave 21.8% that same year while big hearted Biden gave a whopping 1.5 percent.
Not all charity is created equal.
Contributing to your church so they can buy a new organ that you will enjoy is not the same as contributing to starving families
Romney gives the majority of his charity to the Mormons
Are you saying the only legitimate beneficiary of any charitable activity is the poor. If so, then that eliminates libraries, that eliminates hospitals, that eliminates symphonies and museums. It eliminates churches, it eliminates animal shelters, it eliminates the overwhelming majority of nonprofit organizations in the country if you say the only legitimate charitable giving is if you're giving to somebody that's poor.
The thread is about helping those less fortunate. Just because you donate to a church doesn't mean the less fortunate are benefitting from your charity
The definition of charity is broad. Some help those less fortunate more than others
More of that bullshit where conservatives contribute to the churches they belong to?
Charity is charity, does it matter what entity receives it?
Romney gave 29.4% of his income to charity in 2011.
Obama gave 21.8% that same year while big hearted Biden gave a whopping 1.5 percent.
Not all charity is created equal.
Contributing to your church so they can buy a new organ that you will enjoy is not the same as contributing to starving families
Romney gives the majority of his charity to the Mormons
Are you saying the only legitimate beneficiary of any charitable activity is the poor. If so, then that eliminates libraries, that eliminates hospitals, that eliminates symphonies and museums. It eliminates churches, it eliminates animal shelters, it eliminates the overwhelming majority of nonprofit organizations in the country if you say the only legitimate charitable giving is if you're giving to somebody that's poor.
The thread is about helping those less fortunate. Just because you donate to a church doesn't mean the less fortunate are benefitting from your charity
The definition of charity is broad. Some help those less fortunate more than others
This thread is about equality and how it's viewed by conservatives and liberals.
FTR how much of your total income is donated to charity?
Of course......because the wealthy are always so willing to help out those less fortunateThat would imply an ability to think and articulate. See my sig line.rightwinger - please add some of your own content to the OP.
Conservatives wouldnt have this problem as the taller kid would volunteer to hold up the small kid.
Liberals would mandate the stadium provide free boxes to stand on.
Charity is charity, does it matter what entity receives it?
Romney gave 29.4% of his income to charity in 2011.
Obama gave 21.8% that same year while big hearted Biden gave a whopping 1.5 percent.
Not all charity is created equal.
Contributing to your church so they can buy a new organ that you will enjoy is not the same as contributing to starving families
Romney gives the majority of his charity to the Mormons
Are you saying the only legitimate beneficiary of any charitable activity is the poor. If so, then that eliminates libraries, that eliminates hospitals, that eliminates symphonies and museums. It eliminates churches, it eliminates animal shelters, it eliminates the overwhelming majority of nonprofit organizations in the country if you say the only legitimate charitable giving is if you're giving to somebody that's poor.
The thread is about helping those less fortunate. Just because you donate to a church doesn't mean the less fortunate are benefitting from your charity
The definition of charity is broad. Some help those less fortunate more than others
This thread is about equality and how it's viewed by conservatives and liberals.
FTR how much of your total income is donated to charity?
Not only do I donate to charity but I save puppies and kittens and help little old ladies across the street
Not all charity is created equal.
Contributing to your church so they can buy a new organ that you will enjoy is not the same as contributing to starving families
Romney gives the majority of his charity to the Mormons
Are you saying the only legitimate beneficiary of any charitable activity is the poor. If so, then that eliminates libraries, that eliminates hospitals, that eliminates symphonies and museums. It eliminates churches, it eliminates animal shelters, it eliminates the overwhelming majority of nonprofit organizations in the country if you say the only legitimate charitable giving is if you're giving to somebody that's poor.
The thread is about helping those less fortunate. Just because you donate to a church doesn't mean the less fortunate are benefitting from your charity
The definition of charity is broad. Some help those less fortunate more than others
This thread is about equality and how it's viewed by conservatives and liberals.
FTR how much of your total income is donated to charity?
Not only do I donate to charity but I save puppies and kittens and help little old ladies across the street
Unfortunately not a word you say is believed.
Are you saying the only legitimate beneficiary of any charitable activity is the poor. If so, then that eliminates libraries, that eliminates hospitals, that eliminates symphonies and museums. It eliminates churches, it eliminates animal shelters, it eliminates the overwhelming majority of nonprofit organizations in the country if you say the only legitimate charitable giving is if you're giving to somebody that's poor.
The thread is about helping those less fortunate. Just because you donate to a church doesn't mean the less fortunate are benefitting from your charity
The definition of charity is broad. Some help those less fortunate more than others
This thread is about equality and how it's viewed by conservatives and liberals.
FTR how much of your total income is donated to charity?
Not only do I donate to charity but I save puppies and kittens and help little old ladies across the street
Unfortunately not a word you say is believed.
Pictures do not lie
More of that bullshit where conservatives contribute to the churches they belong to?No I dont.I don't see a lot of conservatives holding up anyone.That would imply an ability to think and articulate. See my sig line.rightwinger - please add some of your own content to the OP.
Conservatives wouldnt have this problem as the taller kid would volunteer to hold up the small kid.
Liberals would mandate the stadium provide free boxes to stand on.
Remember how all those conservatives rushed into my house thread to say how they deserve to own all the boxes for themselves?
Here's where I tell you you're fucking stupid.
Wanna compare charitable contrubutions by conservatives vs liberals? Of course not. It makes you look stupid. Not that you need help there.
The thread is about helping those less fortunate. Just because you donate to a church doesn't mean the less fortunate are benefitting from your charity
The definition of charity is broad. Some help those less fortunate more than others
This thread is about equality and how it's viewed by conservatives and liberals.
FTR how much of your total income is donated to charity?
Not only do I donate to charity but I save puppies and kittens and help little old ladies across the street
Unfortunately not a word you say is believed.
Pictures do not lie
Pictures can be manipulated.
This thread is about equality and how it's viewed by conservatives and liberals.
FTR how much of your total income is donated to charity?
Not only do I donate to charity but I save puppies and kittens and help little old ladies across the street
Unfortunately not a word you say is believed.
Pictures do not lie
Pictures can be manipulated.
My personal philanthropy is world renowned. Here I am rescuing a cat from a tree
Are Conservatives Really More Charitable Or Just More Religious James PeronConservatives are way more charitable than democrats.Of course......because the wealthy are always so willing to help out those less fortunateThat would imply an ability to think and articulate. See my sig line.rightwinger - please add some of your own content to the OP.
Conservatives wouldnt have this problem as the taller kid would volunteer to hold up the small kid.
Liberals would mandate the stadium provide free boxes to stand on.
This thread is about equality and how it's viewed by conservatives and liberals.
FTR how much of your total income is donated to charity?
Not only do I donate to charity but I save puppies and kittens and help little old ladies across the street
Unfortunately not a word you say is believed.
Pictures do not lie
Pictures can be manipulated.
My personal philanthropy is world renowned. Here I am rescuing a cat from a tree
Are Conservatives Really More Charitable Or Just More Religious James PeronConservatives are way more charitable than democrats.Of course......because the wealthy are always so willing to help out those less fortunateThat would imply an ability to think and articulate. See my sig line.rightwinger - please add some of your own content to the OP.
Conservatives wouldnt have this problem as the taller kid would volunteer to hold up the small kid.
Liberals would mandate the stadium provide free boxes to stand on.
But conservatives are ignoring the obvious. Something to notice is in the mention of "tithing... to the church." All the survey did was take IRS data "showing the value of charitable deductions claimed by Americans taxpayers." What the IRS may mean by charitable, and what most people think of as charitable, may not be the same thing.
For instance, a local fundamentalist church may spend the bulk of its resources degrading and attacking other faiths, insulting gay people and leading crusades to strip people of their civil liberties. They may never feed the hungry, clothe the naked, or comfort the afflicted. Yet in IRS terms they are a charity no matter how uncharitable they may be.
So democrats don't go to church?Are Conservatives Really More Charitable Or Just More Religious James PeronConservatives are way more charitable than democrats.Of course......because the wealthy are always so willing to help out those less fortunateThat would imply an ability to think and articulate. See my sig line.rightwinger - please add some of your own content to the OP.
Conservatives wouldnt have this problem as the taller kid would volunteer to hold up the small kid.
Liberals would mandate the stadium provide free boxes to stand on.
But conservatives are ignoring the obvious. Something to notice is in the mention of "tithing... to the church." All the survey did was take IRS data "showing the value of charitable deductions claimed by Americans taxpayers." What the IRS may mean by charitable, and what most people think of as charitable, may not be the same thing.
For instance, a local fundamentalist church may spend the bulk of its resources degrading and attacking other faiths, insulting gay people and leading crusades to strip people of their civil liberties. They may never feed the hungry, clothe the naked, or comfort the afflicted. Yet in IRS terms they are a charity no matter how uncharitable they may be.
Not only do I donate to charity but I save puppies and kittens and help little old ladies across the street
Unfortunately not a word you say is believed.
Pictures do not lie
Pictures can be manipulated.
My personal philanthropy is world renowned. Here I am rescuing a cat from a tree
That's not you rescuing that cat. But nice try.
Sometimes it seems so simple
.