Lets Understand Why Trump Sending Those Guys to El Salvador is Illegal

That act, which can only be implemented when the US is at war, allows the Feds to enter your home without a warrant. My advice to them: Bring enough body bags for your whole squad. I'm a head shot expert.
 
Legality is no longer an issue.

Point out any of this administration's actions as illegal or possibly illegal, and you get the WHY DON'T YOU WANT TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN drama queening.

Because, as we know, there is only one (1) way to make America great again, and that's by ignoring its laws, attacking anyone who brings them up, and quietly bending over for our new neofascist state.

Don't worry. The billionaires know what's best for us.
Which is why those billionaires stuck us with their puppets/minions, Clinton, Obama, & Biden. :rolleyes:
 
That act, which can only be implemented when the US is at war,
Again:
That is immaterial:

SEC. 2. And be it further enacted, That it shall be lawful for the President of the United States, whenever he may deem it necessary (for the public safety, to order to be removed out of the territory thereof, any alien who mayor shall be in prison in pursuance of this act; and to cause to be arrested and sent out of the United States such of those aliens as shall have been ordered to depart therefrom and shall not have obtained a license as aforesaid, in all cases where, in the opinion of the President, the public safety requires a speedy removal.
www.archives.gov
 
Again:
That is immaterial:

SEC. 2. And be it further enacted, That it shall be lawful for the President of the United States, whenever he may deem it necessary (for the public safety, to order to be removed out of the territory thereof, any alien who mayor shall be in prison in pursuance of this act; and to cause to be arrested and sent out of the United States such of those aliens as shall have been ordered to depart therefrom and shall not have obtained a license as aforesaid, in all cases where, in the opinion of the President, the public safety requires a speedy removal.
www.archives.gov
I read your link, so I know why you keep skipping section 1.
 
Because section 2 is the section invoked. Why do you ignore it?
Because I can. It's part of a 'war powers' thing, like rounding up Japanese Americans for detainment. You keep saying that it's not. You would be incorrect.
 
That act, which can only be implemented when the US is at war, allows the Feds to enter your home without a warrant. My advice to them: Bring enough body bags for your whole squad. I'm a head shot expert.
:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:sure you are, skippy.
 
Stephen Miller explains in as simple language as he can why it is not a good idea to allow misogynistic terror gang members who come to the country illegally to stay while they awaid a full blown trial.

 
Because I can. It's part of a 'war powers' thing, like rounding up Japanese Americans for detainment. You keep saying that it's not. You would be incorrect.
I get that the language is a bit archaic and I grasp your obvious limitations and that is why I highlighted the relevant passage.

To most, it would be black and white.
 
I get that the language is a bit archaic and I grasp your obvious limitations and that is why I highlighted the relevant passage.

To most, it would be black and white.
You seem to see only what you want to see.
 
Trump invoked the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport those people to El Salvador. The problem with this is that the Act didn't cover this situation.

The Alien Enemies Act: What to know about a 1798 law that Trump has invoked for deportations​


What is the Alien Enemies Act?​

In 1798, with the U.S. preparing for what it believed would be a war with France, Congress passed a series of laws that increased the federal government's reach. The Alien Enemies Act was created to give the president wide powers to imprison and deport noncitizens in time of war.

Since then, the act has been used just three times: during the War of 1812, World War I and World War II.

It was part of the World War II legal rationale for mass internments in the U.S. of people of German, Italian and especially Japanese ancestry. An estimated 120,000 people with Japanese heritage, including those with U.S. citizenship, were incarcerated.


We are not at war with Venezuela. Therefore Trump had no right to do this.
Oh look another Democrat who is for Venezuelan's robbing and raping Americans and throwing them out of their apartments.
 
Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, uses the term "persons" rather than "citizens" when guaranteeing rights like due process and equal protection. :laugh2:

Regardless of immigration status, individuals in the U.S., including those who are undocumented, possess fundamental constitutional rights, including due process and equal protection under the law.

:clap2::21::dance:

sucks to be a CULTIST
Persons and Citizens are synonymous in the U.S. Constitution…Our Preamble is titled We The People of the United States of America and not We The People Of The World…Our Constitution is not an international document, it is exclusive to Americans….Sucks for America hating marxist filth huh?
 
Persons and Citizens are synonymous in the U.S. Constitution…Our Preamble is titled We The People of the United States of America and not We The People Of The World…Our Constitution is not an international document, it is exclusive to Americans….Sucks for America hating marxist filth huh?

BrokeDickLoser says wut?

No, "persons" and "citizens" are not synonymous in the U.S. Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment defines citizenship as applying to "all persons born or naturalized in the United States". While all citizens are persons, not all persons are citizens.

:fu:

you dumb MOFO, think of it this way

”The persons” refers to everybody who live within the borders of the United States, while references to “the citizens” refers to those who are authorized to vote.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom