SweetSue92
Diamond Member
Take the culture back to what?![]()
Pre-Woke. Thank God in heaven
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Take the culture back to what?![]()
I see. Well, if we do 'take the culture back,' let's try not to alienate people in the process. I want this to work just as much as you do.
Hundreds of left wing progressives have been fired for celebrating Kirks murderAbsolutely it can be denied because it's bullshit.
Overall the left has absolutely condemned Kirk's murder and rejects political violence in general.
There are violent degenerates and vitriol to be found on all sides. It's not some sort of left thing that righties like to pretend it is.
Which part of that refuted what you've quoted?Hundreds of left wing progressives have been fired for celebrating Kirks murder
No, I don't think he wanted to see what they'd do. I think he wanted to manipulate them. He got very rich from manipulating people.
He was pushing them towards his right wing points of view.
Yes, maybe other people were trying to trip him up, because it was all a show, rather than a debate. It didn't achieve much other than him getting his right wing message across.
Makes no difference who is potus. The potus is controlled by the same billionaires (including lots of Zionist billionaires) and big corporations. This is why nothing ever improves for the people, but the top .01% always get what they want no matter which crime family controls the WH.Maybe true? But does not change the fact only one "elite" had plans to fix the broken country and is trying every day to get it done.
You ungrateful children be under 4 more Obiden regime years to fully kill the country if left on your own. You're welcome are the words you "elite" middlers are seeking.
MAGA uses divisive language, then blames the left.What evidence would this be?
You just did!Not dignifying that screed with a response.
Why do you try so hard to be validated? Daddy issues?I've watched several videos of Kirk's "conversations" over the last few days.
They are the standard "I'm 100% right, you're 100% wrong" crap coming from both him and the liberal.
That's a debate, not a conversation. Nothing constructive is created in debates like that. No common ground or new ideas come from that. Kirk was just another hardcore partisan ideologue. Both ends have plenty of them.
What has taking the “High road” gotten us?Careful, so that we don't fall into the same traps they did. They refused to converse with us, now the right are refusing to converse with them?
Here's an idea. Seek out the moderates, because believe it or not, there are. Don't broad-brush the left for its extremist wing. We had enough of them doing that to us.
Ok, but HOW was he "pulling them"?
With facts any of those people could look up, research, or read for themselves.
If he told nothing but lies and opinions, then yeah, it would be that way.
But he didn't say anything to anybody that couldn't be found in historical documents or just witness for themselves by watching videos.
I will grant you this..........with the exception of the religious factor. None of that has ever been proven to be real or have ever existed.
Kirk announced well in advance when he will be on campus. If your lil libturd college kids are too lazy to study up on the topics they bring up how the **** is that Kirk’s fault?It is totally Kirk's fault.
He knows what he's doing. He's not debating to get people to be better at debating and increase their skill. He's not trying to get people to be open-minded.
He was pushing his ideology onto people and dressed it up as "debate" or "conversation".
He could have set him whole thing up however he wanted. He did it the way he did it because that's what he wanted, to manipulate people.

You never heard of him, but you claim he is against black people, gay people, and women.He was pushing an ideology. That ideology was not consistent.
For example he'd say he was in favor of free speech, but then he'd be against gay people, against black people, against women.
He was pushing for society to become more conservative, a type of conservative that tells people to conform or else.
That's hurting people and it will hurt people in the future.
I'd not heard of this dude before he got killed.
However my work colleague sounds like a less knowledgeable version of Kirk. He pumped the same ideas. This is what he "believed", and if you get enough people to believe that black people are inferior and need DEI in order to get them jobs, and if they are working they won't be qualified, and that women should be "Kinder, Küche, Kirche" and not be independent people, then yes, he's hurting people.
One of your Murder Cult minions.Who did he get shot dead by? !
And yet you and your Murder Cult claim Trump isn’t qualified for President because he hadn't held any office.Really?
Holding previous elective office doesn't qualify one for higher elective office? A funny and not surprisingly stupid posture you're adopting there.
Once again, you are claiming to know what Kirk was all about after saying you never heard of him.Then don't play little games. I posted assassinations, it was a place to start. I have concentration problems, I don't think of EVERYTHING before I start a conversation. I start with a point, you reply, it makes me thing of something I reply, you think of something until we build up a view of what's going on, maybe making concessions, maybe coming to an understanding, maybe not.
That doesn't mean anything.Pre-Woke. Thank God in heaven