Let's have a conversation

[irosie91]

Oh it just gives me pleasure when I hit them with the facts and I get to watch them sweat and squirm.

how christ-like of you

 

[ChristisKing]

how christ-like of you

Because I'm hitting them with the facts and they can't handle it? Jesus wasn't always nice ya know. He was brutally honest. Loving, but honest all the same. Just like Charlie Kirk. They both were murdered for telling the truth but unfortunately unlike Jesus Charlie Kirk isn't coming back.

 

[irosie91]

Because I'm hitting them with the facts and they can't handle it? Jesus wasn't always nice ya know. He was brutally honest. Loving, but honest all the same. Just like Charlie Kirk. They both were murdered for telling the truth but unfortunately unlike Jesus Charlie Kirk isn't coming back.

Jesus was crucified for "telling the truth"? For what Truth was Jesus crucified? Who
crucified people for "telling the truth"? gee---he's not coming back----who made that
decision?

 

[ChristisKing]

Jesus was crucified for "telling the truth"? For what Truth was Jesus crucified?

He said that He was God in the flesh and nobody believed Him. Until three days after His resurrection that is but I digress we're getting off topic.

 

[irosie91]

He said that He was God in the flesh and nobody believed Him. Until three days after His resurrection that is but I digress we're getting off topic.

the Romans crucified people for claiming to be "GOD" ? since when?

 

[ChristisKing]

the Romans crucified people for claiming to be "GOD" ? since when?

Read the Bible now let's get back on topic.

 

[TemplarKormac]

how christ-like of you

So, it's not Christ-like to lay out the facts?

News to me.

 

[irosie91]

Read the Bible now let's get back on topic.

I read it.

 

[ChristisKing]

So, it's not Christ-like to lay out the facts?

News to me.

I also never cussed anybody out or called anybody names. I just find it amusing that the left can't take what they dish out and I'm sure that it amuses God as well.

 

[irosie91]

So, it's not Christ-like to lay out the facts?

News to me.

try again-----the poster claimed that some people
get all bent out of shape because of that which he
considers "fact" -----and seeing people get all bent
out of shape GIVES HIM A CHARGE. What facts did
Jesus lay out in order for him to engage in self-gratification?
He may have gotten a charge out of dumping on the money
changers in the temple courtyard----The Pharisees hated them

 

[ChristisKing]

try again-----the poster claimed that some people
get all bent out of shape because of that which he
considers "fact" -----and seeing people get all bent
out of shape GIVES HIM A CHARGE.

First of all I'm a woman and second of all you make it seem like it makes me horny or something.

 

[irosie91]

First of all I'm a woman and second of all you make it seem like it makes me horny or something.

you wish

 

[Yarddog]

I've watched several videos of Kirk's "conversations" over the last few days.

They are the standard "I'm 100% right, you're 100% wrong" crap coming from both him and the liberal.

That's a debate, not a conversation. Nothing constructive is created in debates like that. No common ground or new ideas come from that. Kirk was just another hardcore partisan ideologue. Both ends have plenty of them.

He explained his positions in depth and asked the other person a lot of questions as well, so that they could explain themselves. I dissagree. That is constructive to anyone listening to both sides of the argument and they can take what they want from that debate/ conversation. Sadly now there are a bunch of lunatics running around now who believe its ok to assasinate someone for expressing what THEY belive is right... ahh but they believe it is barely a human that they are assassinating..... how do you think we got to that point?

 

[ChristisKing]

you wish

 

[frigidweirdo]

Yes and no.

I think it was more of a test than manipulation. He wanted to see what they would do or say when faced with facts.

You can also say the same thing about people asking him questions. They wanted to get a reaction from him other than him just bluring out book facts. But he didn't give in to many of them.

In a lot of videos I've seen of him in public, it was give and take on both sides.

No, I don't think he wanted to see what they'd do. I think he wanted to manipulate them. He got very rich from manipulating people.

He was pushing them towards his right wing points of view.

Yes, maybe other people were trying to trip him up, because it was all a show, rather than a debate. It didn't achieve much other than him getting his right wing message across.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I assure you, I am doing my utmost.

Then don't play little games. I posted assassinations, it was a place to start. I have concentration problems, I don't think of EVERYTHING before I start a conversation. I start with a point, you reply, it makes me thing of something I reply, you think of something until we build up a view of what's going on, maybe making concessions, maybe coming to an understanding, maybe not.

 

[irosie91]

No, I don't think he wanted to see what they'd do. I think he wanted to manipulate them. He got very rich from manipulating people.

He was pushing them towards his right wing points of view.

Yes, maybe other people were trying to trip him up, because it was all a show, rather than a debate. It didn't achieve much other than him getting his right wing message across.

Based on that which has been passed around about his show----he strikes me as a
CONVINCER ---as you say. Sorta like a TELE-EVANGELIST ----annoying but not
anyone's logical rifle target, Shooting Kirk was tantamount to putting a bullet in
Billy Graham

 

[TemplarKormac]

Then don't play little games. I posted assassinations, it was a place to start. I have concentration problems, I don't think of EVERYTHING before I start a conversation. I start with a point, you reply, it makes me thing of something I reply, you think of something until we build up a view of what's going on, maybe making concessions, maybe coming to an understanding, maybe not.

I see. I meant no harm.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I see. I meant no harm.

I know. But sometimes tactics become a problem on this forum, people get into that habit of using tactics rather than debating, and for a lot of people, they refuse to debate properly. I can see you're not like that.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I know. But sometimes tactics become a problem on this forum, people get into that habit of using tactics rather than debating, and for a lot of people, they refuse to debate properly. I can see you're not like that.

Thank you for that.