Let's have a conversation

[frigidweirdo]

I simply used your metric. We were measuring successful assassinations, were we not?

Are we playing games where we make up rules?

Or are we having an adult discussion about politics, or just a game?

 

[skye]

 

[TemplarKormac]

Are we playing games where we make up rules?

Or are we having an adult discussion about politics, or just a game?

Hey, just going by the metric you set forth.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

The electorate don't exactly have much choice, do they?

Vote for this bunch of shitturds, or that bunch of wankstains.

Hardly a choice. Even Beijing gave the people of Hong Kong three picked choices, instead of two.

I can't argue with that, friend. I've been shouting that very thing here for years. But we must not let our frustration cause us to lose the plot. As long as we have a constitution, we know this can eventually change.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Hey, just going by the metric you set forth.

Hey, let's be adults.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I can't argue with that, friend. I've been shouting that very thing here for years. But we must not let our frustration cause us to lose the plot. As long as we have a constitution, we know this can eventually change.

What it takes is a lot of people pushing for Proportional Representation. Without it, nothing changes.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

What it takes is a lot of people pushing for Proportional Representation. Without it, nothing changes.

Agreed.

 

[Dr.Destructo]

It is totally Kirk's fault.

He knows what he's doing. He's not debating to get people to be better at debating and increase their skill. He's not trying to get people to be open-minded.

He was pushing his ideology onto people and dressed it up as "debate" or "conversation".

He could have set him whole thing up however he wanted. He did it the way he did it because that's what he wanted, to manipulate people.

Yes and no.

I think it was more of a test than manipulation. He wanted to see what they would do or say when faced with facts.

You can also say the same thing about people asking him questions. They wanted to get a reaction from him other than him just bluring out book facts. But he didn't give in to many of them.

In a lot of videos I've seen of him in public, it was give and take on both sides.

 

[candycorn]

Not what I said. Qualifications are important but Harris' qualifications didn't make her qualified for the job of VP.

Really?

Holding previous elective office doesn't qualify one for higher elective office? A funny and not surprisingly stupid posture you're adopting there.

 

[candycorn]

Based on the end results, absolutely not. She was in fact SO not qualified that brain dead Biden STILL tried to run for re-election even after the embarrassment of a debate.

Losing an election doesn't mean you're not qualified. Your blob lost an election too...by a far greater margin than Harris in terms of popular vote.

If a white person had the same credentials Harris had, nobody would say that he wasn't qualified. Your bigotry is on full display.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Hey, let's be adults.

I assure you, I am doing my utmost.

 

[TemplarKormac]

No.

First, we take the culture back and make them KNOW we have.

Then--and ONLY then--do we hear from the moderates.

I see. Well, if we do 'take the culture back,' let's try not to alienate people in the process. I want this to work just as much as you do.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Losing an election doesn't mean you're not qualified. Your blob lost an election too...by a far greater margin than Harris in terms of popular vote.

Looking for a silver lining where there is none.

 

[ChristisKing]

I assure you, I am doing my utmost.

Obviously he's using deflection.

Hey, let's be adults.

Says the person whose IQ is lower than his shoe size.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Obviously he's using deflection.

He can deflect all he wants.

 

[ChristisKing]

He can deflect all he wants.

That's what they do.

 

[TemplarKormac]

That's what they do.

Yes indeed.

 

[ChristisKing]

Yes indeed.

Either that or ignore you completely. Just like my one thread link that I posted on here earlier. I find it rather odd that the radical left is mocking the fact that Charlie Kirk died from gun violence when he was an advocate for the second amendment all because he said that it's going to take more gun deaths in order to make a change in America as if he wouldn't be happy about his death possibly being the first step in making changes in our country. I got no responses from the left because they got nothing.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Either that or ignore you completely. Just like my one thread link that I posted on here earlier. I find it rather odd that the radical left is mocking the fact that Charlie Kirk died from gun violence when he was an advocate for the second amendment all because he said that it's going to take more gun deaths in order to make a change in America as if he wouldn't be happy about his death possibly being the first step in making changes in our country. I got no responses from the left because they got nothing.

They'll intentionally distort anything he said. It's pointless to keep engaging and correcting them.

Spread the message. Overwhelm them with the message.

 

[ChristisKing]

They'll intentionally distort anything he said. It's pointless to keep engaging and correcting them.

Spread the message. Overwhelm them with the message.

Oh it just gives me pleasure when I hit them with the facts and I get to watch them sweat and squirm.