Let's have a conversation

For those on the left who insist on having a 'conversation' about hot-button issues--remember that's all Charlie Kirk wanted to do.

"Let's have a conversation."

Charlie Kirk wanted to 'have a conversation,' and he got shot dead for it. Is it a conversation you want, or something else? Say, maybe, total capitulation to your own views of the world?

Think about that for a minute. Please.

This is what I'm trying to do now, but hopefully it won't wind up being a lost cause.

I've watched several videos of Kirk's "conversations" over the last few days.

They are the standard "I'm 100% right, you're 100% wrong" crap coming from both him and the liberal.

That's just because he always was right.

A BS saying the most people like to say but would never do.

The men and women who died for our country would disagree with you if they didn't already make the ultimate sacrifice.

No. Rejected. The time for "conversation" is over. And I DO NOT, and would never, mean that in a violent way. I mean, they only want a "conversation" now because they know they have been utterly crushed.

We wanted to talk years ago and they called us racist, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic and every other name you can imagine. They hate their own game NOW? Aw

Sadly, I'm afraid that you're correct, but I'm still trying for Charlie.




This sounds great and all but how will that end the fighting?

dimocraps are no longer worth talking to. They are poison. Diseased.

Not only do we have dimocraps in here making excuses and rationalizing the assassination of Charlie Kirk, theyare still calling him names and accusing him of being a "Nazi" or a "Fascist" or a homophobe.

The time for talking to dimocrap scum is gone. I is over. It is time we started crushing them by whatever means are necessary. Hopefully non-violent but -- Whatever it takes.

Oh,nable people like Tyler Robinson, they quote scum like Whoopi Goldfarb, they watch the DISGUSTING FILTH and believe every lie they tel beyond re





Ignore the above stuff since I don't know why it stayed for my new post but I don't have the patience to delete it all before responding.



You asked a question about name calling. Would that include remarks like "democrats hate the country, and want to destroy it?

No, because for the most part it's true.
 
Anyways, my point is we need to get our country back to being peaceful and can we really do that if we're always at war with each other? Legitimate question folks.
 
The left is hateful and violent. That can't be denied.

Absolutely it can be denied because it's bullshit.

Overall the left has absolutely condemned Kirk's murder and rejects political violence in general.

There are violent degenerates and vitriol to be found on all sides. It's not some sort of left thing that righties like to pretend it is.
 
Last edited:
This is what I'm trying to do now, but hopefully it won't wind up being a lost cause.



That's just because he always was right.



The men and women who died for our country would disagree with you if they didn't already make the ultimate sacrifice.



Sadly, I'm afraid that you're correct, but I'm still trying for Charlie.




This sounds great and all but how will that end the fighting?







Ignore the above stuff since I don't know why it stayed for my new post but I don't have the patience to delete it all before responding.





No, because for the most part it's true.
Got it. That's one of the most hypocritical remarks I ever saw.
 
No. His shtick was bully arguing with college kids on one end and then saying crazy shit on his actual podcast.







On debate



On gender, feminism and reproductive rights






On gun violence

On immigration




On Islam




On religion

Every point Kirk made in your post has been the topic of conversation on the USMB Zinc........to my knowledge nobody was shot........ :oops: ~S~
 
Anyways, my point is we need to get our country back to being peaceful and can we really do that if we're always at war with each other? Legitimate question folks.
I hate to tell you this, but these creatures don't want to get along. They want us gone. That must be accepted when you deal with them.
 
Can we have a conversation about this?

WASHINGTON — The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol released a batch of 34 transcripts on Wednesday that showed witnesses repeatedly stymying parts of the panel’s inquiry by invoking their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

The conservative lawyer John Eastman, who advised former President Donald J. Trump on how to try to overturn the 2020 election, cited his Fifth Amendment right 155 times.

The political operative Roger J. Stone Jr. did so in response to more than 70 questions, including ones regarding his communications with Mr. Trump and his role in the events of Jan. 6. The activist Charlie Kirk took a similar stance, citing the potential for self-incrimination in response to most of the committee’s questions, even about his age and education (he was willing to divulge the city in which he resides).

Time and again, the panel ran into roadblocks as it tried to investigate the effort to overturn the election, the transcripts show.

what's the conversation you'd like to have?
 
Show the quote.

I already did.

Read the article before making yourself look stupid.

It says:
I will be putting forth a nominee next week. It will be a woman,” Trump said. “I think it should be a woman because I actually like women much more than men.”

He added that he did not yet know whom he would choose.

He said this the day after Ginsberg died.
 
Absolutely it can be denied because it's bullshit.

Overall the left has absolutely condemned Kirk's murder and rejects political violence in general.
should be everyone of them. it is not. nough said.
 
Anyways, my point is we need to get our country back to being peaceful and can we really do that if we're always at war with each other? Legitimate question folks.
Does that include trump calling his opponents garbage and scum?
 
15th post
The first part doesn't tell you anything about the second part?

Tell me why not.


Charlie Kirk is dead. That part doesn't tell you anything?


Does that include trump calling his opponents garbage and scum?

Anybody who murders somebody for simply just disagreeing with them is lower than scum.
 
Again I'm really on the fence here as I really see your point but Charlie would want us to try finding common ground with them.
And they murdered him for it.

Not just the deviant, pervert idiot that pulled the trigger. The whole cabal. ALL of them. From the lowest dimocrap scum voter to the top of the ticket, the entire party deserves blame. Equal Blame.

They created the air of permissiveness, they started the defense fund for Luigi Mangione and have collected well over a Million Dollars FOR A MURDERER. A COLD-BLOODED MURDERER!!

What kind of scum contributes to a defense fund for a cold blooded murder?

Within minutes of Robinson being caught and his name released, a GoFundMe account was started for his benefit. What kind of scum do that? GoFundMe booted it but how much you wanna bet they started a new one on that GiveSendGo site?

Some people just aren't worth trying to save. If you don't know that yet, you will. As a woman (I assume you are) you want to fix everything. That is your nature. Nurture is what you do. Only women are capable of Unconditional Love. That is as it shoule be but don't get suckered into ruining your life because you feel sorry for some dirtbag. I've seen it. Multiple times. Way too many times.

Some people, you just have to walk away from. It's sad, but it happens to be true. It hurts, but you have to do it.

word
 
Back
Top Bottom