Let's face it: there's no good reason to deny the construction of the ballroom.

I am sure a future President can find a reason to tear down Trumps Giant monstrosity
And a current POTUS can build a beautiful ballroom with security down below. What is your point? Oh yeah, you're a TDS loon.
 
I don't mind the ball room, as long as it is all privately funded, who cares. They can bulldoze the White House and remodel it completely, and I wouldn't care, as long as it is privately funded - not tax payer funded.

It’s against the law to erect buildings on government property in DC without Congressional approval.

WW
 
It’s against the law to erect buildings on government property in DC without Congressional approval.

WW

Prove it.
1777328341633.webp


WW
 
Mexico will pay for it
Because they care so much about your hurt feelings every time you see foreign dignitaries being hosted in style and not having to pee in a porta-potty and stay away from the edges of the tent so the rain won't get them wet. And, of course, not having to wait until warm weather to have important events. But, hey, go for it, it'll be entertaining to watch you guys flail around trying to get somebody ELSE to pay for your temper tantrum.

I think we should put TRUMP!'s name on the marquee to remind everyone who made it possible.
 
Because they care so much about your hurt feelings every time you see foreign dignitaries being hosted in style and not having to pee in a porta-potty and stay away from the edges of the tent so the rain won't get them wet. And, of course, not having to wait until warm weather to have important events. But, hey, go for it, it'll be entertaining to watch you guys flail around trying to get somebody ELSE to pay for your temper tantrum.

I think we should put TRUMP!'s name on the marquee to remind everyone who made it possible.
Who gives a fuk about a ballroom?

We have better uses for $400 million
 
Who gives a fuk about a ballroom?
Obviously, you don't, not really. You only care about destroying something nice that Orange Man built, even if it just makes you look petty and ridiculous.
We have better uses for $400 million
Oh, if you have that kind of money, you can easily handle tearing down a properly secured venue in which to host foreign dignitaries and make them go back to walking on the grass in a tent and peeing in porta-potties. No need to hit up the middle-class taxpayers at all. Do you have your checkbook ready?

Then, of course, you will have to explain to those foreign dignitaries why your temper tantrum forces them to meet in a tent, but hey, you do you.
 
Will those donors be taking a tax deduction on $400 million?
At least $100 million
So you think it would be cheaper to get their “$100 million” in taxes and spend $400 million in taxes.

Your analogy is a huge fail, Short Bus.
 
15th post
Obviously, you don't, not really. You only care about destroying something nice that Orange Man built, even if it just makes you look petty and ridiculous.

A President can tear down what he wants
Didn’t you realize that?
 
Back
Top Bottom