Let's face it: there's no good reason to deny the construction of the ballroom.

Building a big, ugly Victorian ballroom for nobles in a place meant to serve the people seems in poor taste
After 3 attempts on his life.........this project is not about a projection of luxury, its about something as simple as line of sight and the ability to protect our POTUS while making an appearance for social events.

And you don't take any responsibility for these attacks after suggesting that our POTUS is a pompous ass projecting his authority as some type of king? It's comments such as this that allow the mentally unstable to think they are being pushed to demonstrate their loyalty for a social construct party that promotes violence via its hyperbolic rhetoric. :deal:
 
Last edited:
After 3 attempts on his life.........this project is not about a projection of luxury, its about something as simple as line of sight and the ability to protect our POTUS while making an appearance for social events.

And you don't take any responsibility for these attacks after suggesting that our POTUS is a pompous ass projecting his authority as some type of king? It's comments such as this that allow the mentally unstable to think they are being pushed to demonstrate their loyalty for a social construct party that promotes violence via its hyperbolic rhetoric. :deal:
BAM! RIGHT ON!
 
Will those donors be taking a tax deduction on $400 million?
At least $100 million
I don't know, you'll have to ask in the next meeting. Either way, you don't have to pay for it, but you WILL have to pay for the petty revenge scheme of the democrats who would tear it down for no reason at all.
 
I don't know, you'll have to ask in the next meeting. Either way, you don't have to pay for it, but you WILL have to pay for the petty revenge scheme of the democrats who would tear it down for no reason at all.
Tearing it down will cost nothing if donors paid for it
Their loss

Mexico will pay for it
 
Tearing it down will cost nothing if donors paid for it
Their loss

Mexico will pay for it

No need to tear it down.

Keep the modern building, remove the Ballrooms spray painted Home Deport decoration and sell them off.

Then take the shell and divide it up internally to something that is useful.

WW
 
No need to tear it down.

Keep the modern building, remove the Ballrooms spray painted Home Deport decoration and sell them off.

Then take the shell and divide it up internally to something that is useful.

WW
Too big a structure
Tear it down and do it right

Any future President can order it torn down
 
Tearing it down will cost nothing if donors paid for it
Their loss
How much would you contribute? The left is typically not very eager to spend their own money, vastly preferring to spend other peoples', taken at gunpoint.
Mexico will pay for it
You don't know how to get them to do it. Like the left always does, you will end up taxing the middle class to pay for it.
 
How much would you contribute? The left is typically not very eager to spend their own money, vastly preferring to spend other peoples', taken at gunpoint.

You don't know how to get them to do it. Like the left always does, you will end up taxing the middle class to pay for it.

Tear down the TRUMP Ballroom?
Not only would Mexico pay (Gulf of America)
But Canadians would be flocking to help (51 st state)

Tearing down the TRUMP Ballroom would be like tearing down the Berlin Wall

1777322346257.webp
 
Tear down the TRUMP Ballroom?
Not only would Mexico pay (Gulf of America)
But Canadians would be flocking to help (51 st state)

Tearing down the TRUMP Ballroom would be like tearing down the Berlin Wall

View attachment 1249067
Tearing down a building associated with the White House would be a crime, but then, promoting political, criminal activity is what you TDSers do.
 
Back
Top Bottom