rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 309,948
- 268,622
- 3,615
For $400 million?That needs security retro-fitting every time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For $400 million?That needs security retro-fitting every time.
The gold and marble bunker will cost at least that.For $400 million?
After 3 attempts on his life.........this project is not about a projection of luxury, its about something as simple as line of sight and the ability to protect our POTUS while making an appearance for social events.Building a big, ugly Victorian ballroom for nobles in a place meant to serve the people seems in poor taste

Taxpayer dollars, as opposed to a privately funded, secured, quality ballroom that cost you nothing.For $400 million?
Will those donors be taking a tax deduction on $400 million?Taxpayer dollars, as opposed to a privately funded, secured, quality ballroom that cost you nothing.
BAM! RIGHT ON!After 3 attempts on his life.........this project is not about a projection of luxury, its about something as simple as line of sight and the ability to protect our POTUS while making an appearance for social events.
And you don't take any responsibility for these attacks after suggesting that our POTUS is a pompous ass projecting his authority as some type of king? It's comments such as this that allow the mentally unstable to think they are being pushed to demonstrate their loyalty for a social construct party that promotes violence via its hyperbolic rhetoric.![]()
I don't know, you'll have to ask in the next meeting. Either way, you don't have to pay for it, but you WILL have to pay for the petty revenge scheme of the democrats who would tear it down for no reason at all.Will those donors be taking a tax deduction on $400 million?
At least $100 million
Tearing it down will cost nothing if donors paid for itI don't know, you'll have to ask in the next meeting. Either way, you don't have to pay for it, but you WILL have to pay for the petty revenge scheme of the democrats who would tear it down for no reason at all.
Tearing it down will cost nothing if donors paid for it
Their loss
Mexico will pay for it
Too big a structureNo need to tear it down.
Keep the modern building, remove the Ballrooms spray painted Home Deport decoration and sell them off.
Then take the shell and divide it up internally to something that is useful.
WW
How much would you contribute? The left is typically not very eager to spend their own money, vastly preferring to spend other peoples', taken at gunpoint.Tearing it down will cost nothing if donors paid for it
Their loss
You don't know how to get them to do it. Like the left always does, you will end up taxing the middle class to pay for it.Mexico will pay for it
How much would you contribute? The left is typically not very eager to spend their own money, vastly preferring to spend other peoples', taken at gunpoint.
You don't know how to get them to do it. Like the left always does, you will end up taxing the middle class to pay for it.
Your lies are in poor taste.Building a big, ugly Victorian ballroom for nobles in a place meant to serve the people seems in poor taste.
Tearing down a building associated with the White House would be a crime, but then, promoting political, criminal activity is what you TDSers do.Tear down the TRUMP Ballroom?
Not only would Mexico pay (Gulf of America)
But Canadians would be flocking to help (51 st state)
Tearing down the TRUMP Ballroom would be like tearing down the Berlin Wall
View attachment 1249067