Letitia James receives SUBPOENA from the DOJ for violating President Trumps' civil rights.

[Marener]

Section 515. Same used by Garland. I gave it to you three times. Special prosecutor is only in the case of conflict of interest. There is no conflict with James or Schiff.

Section 515 does not create any office. It refers to offices that are created in other parts of the law.

 

[Rawley]

Section 515 does not create any office. It refers to offices that are created in other parts of the law.

You keep chanting "office" Why don't you explain your argument and stop chanting.

 

[Rawley]

Section 515 does not create any office. It refers to offices that are created in other parts of the law.

No it doesn't refer to any other "offices"

 

[Hollie]

Is there any doubt the Founders did not contemplate a prez with the DoJ at his complete disposal to seek revenge against those who would have seen him go to jail?

This must be every convicted criminal's dream. Having the power to command the might of the federal government to punish those who he sees as former threats and adversaries.

Oh. Such melodrama. Is there any doubt that the sleazy left is infuriated that they are held accountable?

 

[Marener]

You keep chanting "office" Why don't you explain your argument and stop chanting.

Read Cannon’s decision. She talks about section 515.

The argument she makes is that no special attorney can be appointed as an inferior officer unless Congress specifically creates an office for them to occupy.

There is no special prosecutor office created by Congress.

Section 515 just says that any officer may run grand juries and such, but Martin and Smith can’t be considered officers because there is no office for them to occupy.

 

[struth]

That’s not a law.

Yes it is, it’s part of the code of federal regulations which get their legal authority from the federal register act.

law

www.law.cornell.edu

Educate yourself dumbass

 

[ThisIsMe]

Smith worked under the DoJ too. It doesn’t matter. Congress has to create the office to which the attorney is appointed and hasn’t done so. There is no office for which Martin has been appointed. Congress has not created an office of special prosecutor.

We've already linked the law that says that isnt true.

And, if smith had broad authority to act as a senior officer, thats why he would have needed senate approval.

Now, if martin is operating under the exact same broad authority as smith was, then they can argue the same thing for him

 

[MarathonMike]

I know you guys are okay with his fraud. You evidently like it.

I guess it's part of your "retribution" or something. Who knows.

Queen Letitia had Mar-A-Lago valued at less than 5 PERCENT of it's true value to help perpetrate her fraudulent case against Trump. But of course, the Trump Hater's Cult faithfully ignores facts to feed their hate.

 

[struth]

Read Cannon’s decision. She talks about section 515.

The argument she makes is that no special attorney can be appointed as an inferior officer unless Congress specifically creates an office for them to occupy.

There is no special prosecutor office created by Congress.

Section 515 just says that any officer may run grand juries and such, but Martin and Smith can’t be considered officers because there is no office for them to occupy.

I did the issue with Jack Smith was that he was not already a DOJ employee,

https://www.cato.org/commentary/analyzing-judge-cannons-opinion-was-jack-smith-legally-appointed

Educate yourself dembot

 

[Marener]

We've already linked the law that says that isnt true.

And, if smith had broad authority to act as a senior officer, thats why he would have needed senate approval.

Now, if martin is operating under the exact same broad authority as smith was, then they can argue the same thing for him

Principle officer and inferior officer, doesn’t matter. Congress still has to create an office for it. Section 515 does not create an office.

Smith was described as an inferior officer, and the court accepted that description.

 

[Marener]

I did the issue with Jack Smith was that he was not already a DOJ employee,

https://www.cato.org/commentary/analyzing-judge-cannons-opinion-was-jack-smith-legally-appointed

Educate yourself dembot

You’re wrong.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Principle officer and inferior officer, doesn’t matter. Congress still has to create an office for it. Section 515 does not create an office.

Smith was described as an inferior officer, and the court accepted that description.

.well, that was the argument judge cannon was trying to make, that smiths appointment came with a very broad authority, and he was allowed to operate with no direct oversight, which made him a superior officer. That is why she dismissed the case.


Now, if the judge in this case can find that Martin is operating under the same broad authority, he too can dismiss the case for the same reason

 

[Rawley]

Read Cannon’s decision. She talks about section 515.

The argument she makes is that no special attorney can be appointed as an inferior officer unless Congress specifically creates an office for them to occupy.

There is no special prosecutor office created by Congress.

Section 515 just says that any officer may run grand juries and such, but Martin and Smith can’t be considered officers because there is no office for them to occupy.

LOL You are talking about Cannon's opinion, not the law. Why didn't you say that 20 posts ago?

Funny that you are depending on the opinion of someone you consider a "hack"

 

[Slade3200]

Let's go!!! Justice is coming for AG James. Her Stalinist attempt to destroy Donald Trump is finally going to get full scrutiny. This is in addition to the investigation into her miraculous rise in net worth through crooked real estate deals.

NY AG Letitia James subpoenaed by Justice Department over $454M civil fraud case against Trump

James was hit with subpoenas as part of a grand jury probe by the Albany US Attorney’s Office into her office’s $454 million civil fraud case against President Trump.

nypost.com

Funny to see Trump go after a political persecution by doing another political persecution. Not at all surprised.

Her case and trumps case are going to have so many parallels it will be laughable

 

[Marener]

.well, that was the argument judge cannon was trying to make, that smiths appointment came with a very broad authority, and he was allowed to operate with no direct oversight, which made him a superior officer. That is why she dismissed the case.


Now, if the judge in this case can find that Martin is operating under the same broad authority, he too can dismiss the case for the same reason

Nope. Cannon’s ruling applies to principle and inferior officers. As long as they have the authority to bring prosecutions, they are an inferior officer and those officers need to have an office created by Congress.

 

[Marener]

LOL You are talking about Cannon's opinion, not the law. Why didn't you say that 20 posts ago?

Funny that you are depending on the opinion of someone you consider a "hack"

Cannon’s decision talks about the law.

Goose/gander

 

[ThisIsMe]

Nope. Cannon’s ruling applies to principle and inferior officers. As long as they have the authority to bring prosecutions, they are an inferior officer and those officers need to have an office created by Congress.

No, the law says the AG can appoint inferior officers without senate approval.

 

[Delldude]

James has done NOTHING illegal, but you don't care.

Mortgage fraud and possible civil rights violations.

 

[Marener]

No, the law says the AG can appoint inferior officers without senate approval.

Congress can grant the AG the ability to appoint an inferior officer but has not done so.

The constitution says:
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Congress can grant the AG the ability to appoint an inferior officer but has not done so.

The constitution says:
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

Exactly. You Just posted my argument.

but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

This is saying that congress can pass laws that allow the president, the courts, or department heads, to appoint inferior officers without advice and consent, which they did, in the law that I linked