excalibur
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2015
- 28,387
- 57,380
- 2,290
You don’t actually think there’s going to be convictions, do you?
Ask Fani Willis. She's got time on her hands these days.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You don’t actually think there’s going to be convictions, do you?
Other cases are being tossed because of Trump’s illegally appointed prosecutors.So you just called the case over
I don’t know why the government (ie, the U.S. Attorney’s Office) would allow it. But, if she can secure a plea to a mere misdemeanor, she would not automatically lose her license to practice law.Show them the application and affidavit signed by her. It really is that simple. The more simple you make the case, the harder it is for a juror to deny it as they will be the one having to defend it in the deliberations when the other jurors jump on her for dragging the thing out.
Show them the application and affidavit signed by her. It really is that simple. The more simple you make the case, the harder it is for a juror to deny it as they will be the one having to defend it in the deliberations when the other jurors jump on her for dragging the thing out.
Is Trump above the law? He is to his MAGA asseater's who applaud everything that conman lowlife does, ColonelAnus.
Trump is the worst pile of evil scum who ever held any public office in the history of this country. That coxsucker makes Nixon look like a cub scout.
These indicments of James & Comey are another example of his evilness but you assholes don't care.
Same reason you think Trump was guilty.Why do you think that?
good luck!
![]()
The prosecution will certainly do that, but the defense will obscure and blame Trump. They only need one juror with TDS to ignore the facts.
The indictment was much easier. There is only one side, the prosecution, making the case. The burden of proof if much lower - more likely than not. And they only need 12 of 23 jurors to agree.
Bullshit. Judge Engeron had no clue what the property values were. We saw LAWFARE.Trump had a trial where we saw all the evidence and it was 100% clear that he did indeed massively inflate his net worth.
The only real defense was “everyone lies”, which is hardly a defense.
We will see.Do you think these prosecutions are based on good solid evidence?
I saw the evidence against Trump. What evidence have you seen against Comey?Same reason you think Trump was guilty.
That’s false. There was ample testimony which included the valuations from credible appraisers which Trump inflated by a factor of 5x or more.Judge Engeron had no clue what the property values were.
LIAR. From my link above:That’s false. There was ample testimony which included the valuations from credible appraisers which Trump inflated by a factor of 5x or more.
I actually still believe in juries when the evidence is going to be that straight forward. I have seen quotes from jurors in some high profile cases and they seem to often say "Well I was skeptical, and then...." They all seem to be able to point to one thing that made all the difference for them and other jurors. If she signed the docs, I would be finding some other way to try to spin it like "Well I intended to move in when I signed those, but then I became concerned about security once I got to spend some time at the property" or something like that.The prosecution will certainly do that, but the defense will obscure and blame Trump. They only need one juror with TDS to ignore the facts.
The indictment was much easier. There is only one side, the prosecution, making the case. The burden of proof if much lower - more likely than not. And they only need 12 of 23 jurors to agree.
Dictatorship.New York Attorney General Letitia James was indicted in federal court on Thursday as President Donald Trump’s Justice Department continues to pursue charges against his political opponents.
Specific details not yet available, but it sounds like mortgage fraud. Oh what a tangled web we weave.
MSN
There is no longer law.NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, NOT EVEN LETICIA JAMES!
What evidence did you see against Trump?I saw the evidence against Trump. What evidence have you seen against Comey?
Where da bleach quote at?There is no longer law.
Where are the Epstein files?Is Trump above the law? He is to his MAGA asseater's who applaud everything that conman lowlife does, ColonelAnus.
Trump is the worst pile of evil scum who ever held any public office in the history of this country. That coxsucker makes Nixon look like a cub scout.
These indicments of James & Comey are another example of his evilness but you assholes don't care.
I think you guys know these prosecutions are doomed. Your real goal is to just make people suffer through the process.
And that’s corrupt.