Letitia James fraud case victory in question?


Deutsche Bank reviewed the financial statements before making the loans through its department that works with rich individuals — a pathway that allowed for more favorable interest rates than likely available from the commercial real estate division, according to the lawsuit. The deals came with conditions about Trump’s net worth and, sometimes, liquidity, and they often required annual submissions of his financial statements.

But, testifying for the defense, managing director David Williams said the bankers viewed clients’ reports of their net worth as “subjective or subject to estimates” and took its own view of such financial statements.

“I think we expect clients-provided information to be accurate. At the same time, it’s not an industry standard that these statements be audited. They’re largely reliant on the use of estimates,” Williams said, so bankers routinely “make some adjustments.”
I prefer to hear what American juries say.

#LOCKHIMUP
 
Whether they made money isn’t the question and their “due diligence” seems to be lacking and does not exonerate Trump.

#LOCKHIMUP
There was no harm claimed, no proven, which means your dear Leticia is engaged in nothing more than election interference

#LOCKTHATBITCHUP
 
I prefer to hear what American juries say.

#LOCKHIMUP
there was no jury in this case, and a jury, or judge hearing the case, is suppose to listen to the evidence, which I just provided you
 
And the bank said they did their assessment of Trumps net worth and gave him the loan.
Based on his criminally fraudulent financial statements.

These financial statements are submitted under penalty of law, If not accurate.

These are the laws that protect the banks from criminals like trump.

Are you following this?
 
Based on his criminally fraudulent financial statements.

These financial statements are submitted under penalty of law, If not accurate.

These are the laws that protect the banks from criminals like trump.

Are you following this?
No. Read the testimony. They do an independent assessment.
 
there was no jury in this case, and a jury, or judge hearing the case, is suppose to listen to the evidence, which I just provided you
They did listen and pronounced him guilty in both trials, jury AND non-jury!

#LOCKHIMUP
 
No. Read the testimony. They do an independent assessment.
Of what is presented to them. They do not appraise the properties.

That's how Trump got away with his crime spree.

You're not telling anyone anything new. You have not outsmarted Trump's lawyers, or the judge.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom