Letitia James fraud case victory in question?

I don’t claim to know the ins and outs of real estate dealings, but the judge did ask if this kind of case had ever been prosecuted before, which would seem to indicate that this practice is somewhat common in the real estate world.

If it is, and nobody else has been prosecuted for it, then it raises another question about why they went after trump (we know why, they told us why)
James didn't prosecute Trump's real estate dealings. She prosecuted him for falsifying his business records.
 
It’s in the transcripts

The fact you dembots don’t even know he testified is comical
I know he testified. It was in my link.

Gonna need a link to those transcripts where he says what you claimed.
 
James didn't prosecute Trump's real estate dealings. She prosecuted him for falsifying his business records.
And the law is very clear that submitting false statements -- as Trump demonstrably did -- is a felony.
 
And the law is very clear that submitting false statements -- as Trump demonstrably did -- is a felony.
Not in this case. Trump cooked the books in order to get sweetheart deals, not to hide another crime like he did in his hush money case.
 
Not in this case. Trump cooked the books in order to get sweetheart deals, not to hide another crime like he did in his hush money case.
Yes, in this case. It's the basis of the entire case. I'm not arguing against anything you say

He committed felony fraud for decades to secure more favorable loan and insurance rates.

He submitted false financial statements to lenders.
 
Yes, in this case. It's the basis of the entire case. I'm not arguing against anything you say

He committed felony fraud for decades to secure more favorable loan and insurance rates.

He submitted false financial statements to lenders.
Fraud was the business model of the Trump Organization.
 
That was Trump’s testimony, not Weisselberg’s.

In the link, Trump blames everyone else. Says he had no idea.
There is a hyperlink in there to the full transcript

Yes he had no idea because he sent the attachment back in thr 90s
 
In this case?!? Haha
Yep.

He went to jail for perjuring himself, in his testimony.

All to cover for the orange slob.

The old man went to Riker's for trump again, in hopes of tasting some more of that sweet trump honey.
 
Yep.

He went to jail for perjuring himself, in his testimony.

All to cover for the orange slob.

The old man went to Riker's for trump again, in hopes of tasting some more of that sweet trump honey.
Hahah no he didn’t. Stop lying
 
Hahah no he didn’t. Stop lying
He sure did.

You might want to read up, before commenting again

That was the second time the old man went to Riker's Island, in order to protect his orange god.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom