Jets
Platinum Member
- Jun 29, 2019
- 4,272
- 2,591
- 940
I just did several times,,,while leaving out the word lawfully and ignoring the 9th and 10th amendment,,,,they first have to prove they have authority before voting on it,, and scotus only comes into play if its contested and allowed to be heard,,, and it doesnt help when we have a corrupted scotus like we currently do,,you left out lawfully,,the 9th and 10th amendments are the legal barrier unless of course you can show me where in the constitution this authority exists???no its not,, its for those that take an oath to follow,,,not lawfully if the power doesnt exist in the constitution,,,congress cant vote on it if that is not a duly authorized power in the constitution,,,If it passes thru Congress I do not object to it in principle if the votes are there. However, I do not agree with President Biden doing this by fiat.
jmo
They absolutely could call for a vote on this if it’s introduced as a bill in Congress.
I understand that, but it is for the SC to decide.
the 9th and 10th amendments makes that clear,,
There is no legal barrier preventing Congress from voting on this bill.
ONLY SCOTUS can rule it unconstitutional.
Period.
I just did. Congress can vote on this issue. What can stop them from voting on this issue.
Answer: nothing.
the 9th and 10th amendments are pretty clear what they can and cant vote on,,,
Correct. That is why the SC would end up ruling on this issue.
what youre proposing is what dictators and tyrants do,,,
Not attempting to propose anything. I’m just explaining how the process would go about.
Please point out the clause in the Constitution that PREVENTS Congress from bringing this bill up in committee which then sends it out to the full house for a vote.
No you didn’t. The correct answer is NOTHING PREVENTS Congress from bringing this bill up in a committee to send to a full house for a vote. If it passes becomes law. Period
Only the SC can rule this passed law unconstitutional.