Lesbians whining because doc refused to be baby's doctor

[PaintMyHouse]

Why does government have any legitimate right to force anyone to do business with another?

Because we allow the business to exist in the first place, and we pay for what the business could not be a business without, including the bloody roads to get there. We have every right to set the rules, and we do. Now I know that you being a child means you don't like rules, but that can't be helped.

 

[koshergrl]

The florist didn't refuse to sell flowers...she refused to cater a homo wedding.

There's a difference.

Why is that different? In either case it's not a legitimate use of government force to compel them to do business

Because if they had just come in to buy a bouquet, that's a different thing than requiring the florist to provide flowers, knowingly, for a ritual that the florist considers sacrilegious.

Tell us, if one of the men had bought standard flowers, and mentioned to her that he was going to ask his partner to marry him with them, would she have been right to refuse to sell them?

No.

But if they asked the florist to specially prepare flowers meant to be used in a ceremony that was considered by the florist to be sacrilegious, yes.

See, asking someone to marry you isn't a sacrament.

Marriage is. And as such, being forced to design/provide/deliver materials to be used in a ceremony that is a vile sacrilege of one of the most holy rituals Christians participate in...is a violation of our right to religious freedom.

What part of getting married at a public courthouse is Holy? And why is the proposal any less of a sin than the wedding?

It's not holy at all when faggots do it.

However the ceremony is considered a sacrament to Christians, and is why the consider it a sacrilege when faggots celebrate it in their special wag.

 

[koshergrl]

Why does government have any legitimate right to force anyone to do business with another?

Because we allow the business to exist in the first place, and we pay for what the business could not be a business without, including the bloody roads to get there. We have every right to set the rules, and we do. Now I know that you being a child means you don't like rules, but that can't be helped.

You don't "allow business" to exist, you freak.

Gads, go to N. Korea and leave the rest of us alone. Weirdo.

 

[g5000]

Why is that different? In either case it's not a legitimate use of government force to compel them to do business

Because if they had just come in to buy a bouquet, that's a different thing than requiring the florist to provide flowers, knowingly, for a ritual that the florist considers sacrilegious.

Tell us, if one of the men had bought standard flowers, and mentioned to her that he was going to ask his partner to marry him with them, would she have been right to refuse to sell them?

No.

But if they asked the florist to specially prepare flowers meant to be used in a ceremony that was considered by the florist to be sacrilegious, yes.

See, asking someone to marry you isn't a sacrament.

Marriage is. And as such, being forced to design/provide/deliver materials to be used in a ceremony that is a vile sacrilege of one of the most holy rituals Christians participate in...is a violation of our right to religious freedom.

What part of getting married at a public courthouse is Holy? And why is the proposal any less of a sin than the wedding?

It's not holy at all when faggots do it.

However the ceremony is considered a sacrament to Christians, and is why the consider it a sacrilege when faggots celebrate it in their special wag.

Making a cake is not a Christian sacrament, moron.

 

[kaz]

Why does government have any legitimate right to force anyone to do business with another?

Because we allow the business to exist in the first place

We "allow" it to exist? Once again you make clear you are an authoritarian leftist, there is zero liberal about you

 

[koshergrl]

The florist didn't refuse to sell flowers...she refused to cater a homo wedding.

There's a difference.

Why is that different? In either case it's not a legitimate use of government force to compel them to do business

Because if they had just come in to buy a bouquet, that's a different thing than requiring the florist to provide flowers, knowingly, for a ritual that the florist considers sacrilegious.

Tell us, if one of the men had bought standard flowers, and mentioned to her that he was going to ask his partner to marry him with them, would she have been right to refuse to sell them?

No.

But if they asked the florist to specially prepare flowers meant to be used in a ceremony that was considered by the florist to be sacrilegious, yes.

See, asking someone to marry you isn't a sacrament.

Marriage is. And as such, being forced to design/provide/deliver materials to be used in a ceremony that is a vile sacrilege of one of the most holy rituals Christians participate in...is a violation of our right to religious freedom.

That seems like a completely arbitrary standard. What difference does it make if you are asked to sell work you did do or will do? Why does government have any legitimate right to force anyone to do business with another?

I'm arguing from the standpoint that the state cannot force a person to commit sacrilege or be shut down.

I'm not really speaking to the other point. Which is also valid.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Why does government have any legitimate right to force anyone to do business with another?

Because we allow the business to exist in the first place

We "allow" it to exist? Once again you make clear you are an authoritarian leftist, there is zero liberal about you

That is correct. In this society you can start a business because we allow you to. And learn how to quote properly, that isn't it.

 

[koshergrl]

Why does government have any legitimate right to force anyone to do business with another?

Because we allow the business to exist in the first place

We "allow" it to exist? Once again you make clear you are an authoritarian leftist, there is zero liberal about you

That is correct. In this society you can start a business because we allow you to. And learn how to quote properly, that isn't it.

Who the hell is *we*, you mentally ill fascist?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I'm arguing from the standpoint that the state cannot force a person to commit sacrilege or be shut down.

Well your argument died, about six decades ago. Hopefully you know that?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Why does government have any legitimate right to force anyone to do business with another?

Because we allow the business to exist in the first place

We "allow" it to exist? Once again you make clear you are an authoritarian leftist, there is zero liberal about you

That is correct. In this society you can start a business because we allow you to. And learn how to quote properly, that isn't it.

Who the hell is *we*, you mentally ill fascist?

Society, kiddos. The royal we, all 320 million of us.

 

[kaz]

you don't like rules, but that can't be helped.

Yes, that's so true about liberals, we don't like rules. If we're not hurting anyone, we should be able to dance naked in our back yard and throw candy corns in the air and try to catch them in our mouths, it's up to us. You would know nothing about that. You are obsessed with government running around with guns peeking in windows and eavesdropping on conversations stepping in and stopping anyone who dares to think differently than you do or do anything you don't approve of or force them to do what you don't approve of them not doing

 

[kaz]

Why is that different? In either case it's not a legitimate use of government force to compel them to do business

Because if they had just come in to buy a bouquet, that's a different thing than requiring the florist to provide flowers, knowingly, for a ritual that the florist considers sacrilegious.

Tell us, if one of the men had bought standard flowers, and mentioned to her that he was going to ask his partner to marry him with them, would she have been right to refuse to sell them?

No.

But if they asked the florist to specially prepare flowers meant to be used in a ceremony that was considered by the florist to be sacrilegious, yes.

See, asking someone to marry you isn't a sacrament.

Marriage is. And as such, being forced to design/provide/deliver materials to be used in a ceremony that is a vile sacrilege of one of the most holy rituals Christians participate in...is a violation of our right to religious freedom.

What part of getting married at a public courthouse is Holy? And why is the proposal any less of a sin than the wedding?

It's not holy at all when faggots do it.

However the ceremony is considered a sacrament to Christians, and is why the consider it a sacrilege when faggots celebrate it in their special wag.

Bad news on that, most Christians don't care

 

[koshergrl]

I'm arguing from the standpoint that the state cannot force a person to commit sacrilege or be shut down.

Well your argument died, about six decades ago. Hopefully you know that?

No, my argument is perfect, and you're about the third incarnation of the same lunatic extremist queerbo I've cycled through.

 

[koshergrl]

Because if they had just come in to buy a bouquet, that's a different thing than requiring the florist to provide flowers, knowingly, for a ritual that the florist considers sacrilegious.

Tell us, if one of the men had bought standard flowers, and mentioned to her that he was going to ask his partner to marry him with them, would she have been right to refuse to sell them?

No.

But if they asked the florist to specially prepare flowers meant to be used in a ceremony that was considered by the florist to be sacrilegious, yes.

See, asking someone to marry you isn't a sacrament.

Marriage is. And as such, being forced to design/provide/deliver materials to be used in a ceremony that is a vile sacrilege of one of the most holy rituals Christians participate in...is a violation of our right to religious freedom.

What part of getting married at a public courthouse is Holy? And why is the proposal any less of a sin than the wedding?

It's not holy at all when faggots do it.

However the ceremony is considered a sacrament to Christians, and is why the consider it a sacrilege when faggots celebrate it in their special wag.

Bad news on that, most Christians don't care

I think they do care, but it isn't something you can really do much about.

Except to refuse to participate in the travesty the faggots have made of our sacred ceremonies.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

you don't like rules, but that can't be helped.

Yes, that's so true about liberals, we don't like rules. If we're not hurting anyone, we should be able to dance naked in our back yard and throw candy corns in the air and try to catch them in our mouths, it's up to us. You would know nothing about that. You are obsessed with government running around with guns peeking in windows and eavesdropping on conversations stepping in and stopping anyone who dares to think differently than you do or do anything you don't approve of or force them to do what you don't approve of them not doing

More drama queen than all of Castro Street.

And if you going to run around naked, make sure the kids next door can't see. It's illegal if they can.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I'm arguing from the standpoint that the state cannot force a person to commit sacrilege or be shut down.

Well your argument died, about six decades ago. Hopefully you know that?

No, my argument is perfect, and you're about the third incarnation of the same lunatic extremist queerbo I've cycled through.

Sweetcheeks, no less than the Supreme Court said what you believe is BS, a very long time ago. Would you like to read the case?

 

[Lilah]

Tell us, if one of the men had bought standard flowers, and mentioned to her that he was going to ask his partner to marry him with them, would she have been right to refuse to sell them?

No.

But if they asked the florist to specially prepare flowers meant to be used in a ceremony that was considered by the florist to be sacrilegious, yes.

See, asking someone to marry you isn't a sacrament.

Marriage is. And as such, being forced to design/provide/deliver materials to be used in a ceremony that is a vile sacrilege of one of the most holy rituals Christians participate in...is a violation of our right to religious freedom.

What part of getting married at a public courthouse is Holy? And why is the proposal any less of a sin than the wedding?

It's not holy at all when faggots do it.

However the ceremony is considered a sacrament to Christians, and is why the consider it a sacrilege when faggots celebrate it in their special wag.

Bad news on that, most Christians don't care

I think they do care, but it isn't something you can really do much about.

Except to refuse to participate in the travesty the faggots have made of our sacred ceremonies.

Were you a guest a Kim Kardashian's sacred ceremony when she wed number two?

 

[kaz]

Why does government have any legitimate right to force anyone to do business with another?

Because we allow the business to exist in the first place

We "allow" it to exist? Once again you make clear you are an authoritarian leftist, there is zero liberal about you

That is correct. In this society you can start a business because we allow you to. And learn how to quote properly, that isn't it.

Hold on their. Your going to quick to reed that write. Of course that was proper, its your word and the word I was emphasizing.

And you're point is only write to an authoritarian leftist

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Tell us, if one of the men had bought standard flowers, and mentioned to her that he was going to ask his partner to marry him with them, would she have been right to refuse to sell them?

No.

But if they asked the florist to specially prepare flowers meant to be used in a ceremony that was considered by the florist to be sacrilegious, yes.

See, asking someone to marry you isn't a sacrament.

Marriage is. And as such, being forced to design/provide/deliver materials to be used in a ceremony that is a vile sacrilege of one of the most holy rituals Christians participate in...is a violation of our right to religious freedom.

What part of getting married at a public courthouse is Holy? And why is the proposal any less of a sin than the wedding?

It's not holy at all when faggots do it.

However the ceremony is considered a sacrament to Christians, and is why the consider it a sacrilege when faggots celebrate it in their special wag.

Bad news on that, most Christians don't care

I think they do care, but it isn't something you can really do much about.

Except to refuse to participate in the travesty the faggots have made of our sacred ceremonies.

Marriage hasn't been sacred, ever. Your faith may tell you that but they were also the ones raping all the children so there you go...

 

[koshergrl]

I'm arguing from the standpoint that the state cannot force a person to commit sacrilege or be shut down.

Well your argument died, about six decades ago. Hopefully you know that?

No, my argument is perfect, and you're about the third incarnation of the same lunatic extremist queerbo I've cycled through.

Sweetcheeks, no less than the Supreme Court said what you believe is BS, a very long time ago. Would you like to read the case?

You think I care what the supreme court *thinks*? The supreme court is wrong all the time.