Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
You're saying 4 shots were too many.LOL
According to you, that would mean he could have kept shooting into his back until his magazine was empty and it would still be self defense.
EVERYBODY disagrees.
Cry.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're saying 4 shots were too many.LOL
According to you, that would mean he could have kept shooting into his back until his magazine was empty and it would still be self defense.
No, moron, I'm posting what I see in videos; not what the news is telling me. So once again you try to insult me but you end up looking like an idiot by getting it all wrong.
And why the board has an ignore button.Faun does not agree because Faun is a self-defense ignoramus.
..and a commie.

Rittenhouse was asked by his friend to help save the business he (his friend) owned, and where Rittenhouse worked.
Save some of your senseless blame for the BLM friendly mobs that tried to burn down Kenosha.
Without their lawlessness Rittenhouse would have zero reason to be in Kenosha when it was
under siege.
There is if he is not guilty.There is zero justice in allowing Kyle to get off scot free.
He will walk.The whole thing was and still is, a mess. Justice. There is zero justice in allowing Kyle to get off scot free. And there is no real justice locking him up for a severe time period.
LOLOLYou are SEETHING. I love it when commies get mad after they lose.
![]()
LOLOLNo, really? Is water wet too?
![]()
It's over, *****. Your commies died like they should.
Cry.
"LOLOL"LOLOL
Oh? What do you delude yourself into believing I lost?
Sadly for Rittenhouse, no, not everyone agrees.You're saying 4 shots were too many.
EVERYBODY disagrees.
Cry.
That's because I didn't say between 0:05 - 0:06.He fell forward while the shots were being fired at 0:05 and 0:06. Behind a vehicle. That does not corroborate your claim.
Chicago Tribune can't help themselves...
That's because I didn't say between 0:05 - 0:06.
You're not very good at following directions.
Chicago Tribune can't help themselves...
Ciao.Unfortunately for you, I watched all of the video, as I have a sufficient attention span to do so. Unlike you.
Between 0:04 and 0:07 is what I focused on. By 0:07, Rosenbaum had already fallen behind the vehicle, all four shots having been fired in the 1.5 seconds prior. You would have seen the gunsmoke from any additional shots had Rittenhouse chosen to fire on Rosenbaum while he was on the ground.
So no, I don't need to cherry-pick a video like you to prove you wrong.
We're done. Your premise has been thoroughly eviscerated.
Enjoy the rest of your night.
