Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
- Thread starter
- #581
Romer Governor of Colorado et al. v. Evans et al. 517 U.S. 620 1996 .
With special attention to the very last 2 paragraphs. Its not a difficult read. One of those paragraphs is only 5 words long.
And in the entire ruling you'll notice no mention of 'innateness of homosexuality' being the basis of the ruling. Or the 'immutability of homosexuality'. Or that homsexuality is a 'static trait'....There's simply no mention of any of it in any ruling on homosexuality by this court.
And upon that terrible blunder that opens wide the doors for any other repugnant behavioral group to dictate to the majority, that case's essence might be overturned. This would be especially true if that behavioral culture posed a danger or detriment to children they were trying to get access to through adoption agencies. We'd better take a damn good look at the flaws of previous rulings where the importance of innate vs behavior was ignored..