Lawyers mock Trump: 'Too busy to be honest' about Trump U

[ClosedCaption]

This is such an obvious political hit job using the judiciary for Clinton.

The case was in front of the Judge before he ran but nice time line shift you got there

 

[SwimExpert]

And if Judge Curiel is so damned biased and conniving against Trump, WHY isn't the lawsuit proceeding before the convention?

Well, because, um, er--BENGHAZI!!

 

[jknowgood]

.

Someone explain to me why a man who wants us to elect him President on the basis of his "vast business experience" - and whose major business acumen appears to be in the area of marketing, branding, and hyping himself - doesn't know what they teach first year advertising and marketing students: you cannot lie in advertising. You can "puffery" all you like, but it has to be at least technically true.

Good grief! Trump's a very successful businessman. Not all of his enterprises have been successful, but most have. And here you are basically calling him a fool. Unreal.
In every enterprise one is going to find unhappy customers. That's right across the board.

It's to be expected.

Trump's businesses have filed for 4 bankruptcies, more than any other businessman in the US over the same period of time. Trump admits to using debt protection laws to leverage his borrowings and reduce his debt. He suggests that he would do the same thing with the debt owed by the US to China.

Trump went bankrupt operating a casino, even though a casino license is pretty much a license to print money. Many of Trump's business ideas have been spectacularly unsuccessful. Trump Steaks, Trump Mortgage, Trump Vodka, Trump University - the list of Trump failures is long and sorry. The Saudi's wrote the cheques for the construction of the Toronto Trump Hotel and that was after Trump tried for nearly 10 years to get the place built.

Trump is almost the perfect Republican candidate. He's incapable of telling the truth, and yet you believe his every word. He is an unrepentant racist, misogynist, and you applaud both his racism and misogyny.

This will destroy the Republican Party, and quite frankly, they deserve it.

Anyone but the lying treasonous bitch Hillary.

 

[jknowgood]

Bilking people out of tens of thousands of dollars and calling it "puffery" is orders of magnitude different from putting out a clearly ordinary vodka and charging a premium price, just because it has the Trump name on it. Branding has a long and storied history in American business, but with Trump U Lyin' Don moved into Scientology-type scam territory.

Universities made bilking students out of their money, backed by mother government, a cottage industry. This is selective outrage. THAT is what's political about it.

Universities provide actual instruction, despite your efforts to bring them down to the Trump PU level.

When did colleges start to guarantee success after graduating?

 

[ClosedCaption]

This is such an obvious political hit job using the judiciary for Clinton.

Even for a Trumpette, that's insane. The first lawsuit against Trump U was filed in 2010, the second and third in 2013, long before Trump even announced his candidacy, let alone before he became Hillary Clinton's primary opponent. If those people were so prescient they knew they'd need a lawsuit to derail his candidacy all the way back in 2010, don't you think they'd have been prescient enough to know he was scamming them in the first place?

He's been running for president since 2000. I don't think the suit has anything to do with it though. But what ever happened to innocent until proven guilty? The libs run with that for Hillary but have Trump guilty for much less.

Because Trump hasnt denied any of it. He just takes the fraud label off the box, slaps the word "puffery" on it and says "Look its not Fraud, See what it says there? Puffery...its nothing"

 

[konradv]

Universities provide actual instruction, despite your efforts to bring them down to the Trump PU level.

When did colleges start to guarantee success after graduating?

Where did I say they did? They do require certification, competent instructors and a public face that doesn't tell bald-faced lies just to rake in more bucks.

 

[konradv]

Overcharge, hell yes. Tuition has skyrocketed. A student can go to a "legitimate" university and come away with a very expensive worthless degree. So I take the whole Trump U thing with a grain of salt.

If students come away with a worthless degree, it's usually because they chose a major unwisely. In the case of Trump "U"(in quotes because it really wasn't a U) the name was supposed to be enough, no real foundation for a career in real estate was provided and most of the "instructors" didn't have the credentials to be teaching in the field.

 

[playtime]

This is such an obvious political hit job using the judiciary for Clinton.

Even for a Trumpette, that's insane. The first lawsuit against Trump U was filed in 2010, the second and third in 2013, long before Trump even announced his candidacy, let alone before he became Hillary Clinton's primary opponent. If those people were so prescient they knew they'd need a lawsuit to derail his candidacy all the way back in 2010, don't you think they'd have been prescient enough to know he was scamming them in the first place?

He's been running for president since 2000. I don't think the suit has anything to do with it though. But what ever happened to innocent until proven guilty? The libs run with that for Hillary but have Trump guilty for much less.

Hillary's not bribing AG's in two states not to file law suits. And innocent until proven guilty only applies to criminal prosecution. These are all civil suits so there is no presumption of innocence. Trump has been sued so often he has litigation lawyers on retainer. He lies about not settling, about what's failed and what hasn't. He lied about Judge Curiel, and yet you believe him.

You're prepared to find Hillary guilty of all sorts of things - cover-ups, security breaches, bribery, obstruction, all of which have been investigated extensively by Republicans, Special Prosecutors, and Congressional Committees, and all of which have concluded that there's nothing to see here, and yet still you believe that she's guilty and corrupt. No charges have ever been filed - in over 30 years of witch hunts, no evidence has ever been uncovered, in spite of more than a dozen investigations, all instigated by Republicans, and no one has ever turned "state's evidence" on the Clintons, except Monica.

And still you believe the lies against Hillary, and deny the truth about Trump. Denial is not just a river in Egypt.

No presumption of innocence in a civil suit? That's off the charts stupid. Anyone can sue anyone for anything. The rest of your steamy pile isn't worth my time.

Yes, anybody can sue for anything. & the evidence in a civil suit has to be shown to be a preponderance... hmmmm, it's not looking too good for Donny. BUT in a criminal trial there has to be evidence to show guilt beyond any reasonable doubt.

Hillary has never been found guilty of anything.

 

[jknowgood]

Universities provide actual instruction, despite your efforts to bring them down to the Trump PU level.

When did colleges start to guarantee success after graduating?

Where did I say they did? They do require certification, competent instructors and a public face that doesn't tell bald-faced lies just to rake in more bucks.

Lol, with the liberal education system has raised a generation that needs safe places if they see or hear something they disagree with. Almost every college should be sued if Trump gets sued.

 

[jknowgood]

This is such an obvious political hit job using the judiciary for Clinton.

Even for a Trumpette, that's insane. The first lawsuit against Trump U was filed in 2010, the second and third in 2013, long before Trump even announced his candidacy, let alone before he became Hillary Clinton's primary opponent. If those people were so prescient they knew they'd need a lawsuit to derail his candidacy all the way back in 2010, don't you think they'd have been prescient enough to know he was scamming them in the first place?

He's been running for president since 2000. I don't think the suit has anything to do with it though. But what ever happened to innocent until proven guilty? The libs run with that for Hillary but have Trump guilty for much less.

Because Trump hasnt denied any of it. He just takes the fraud label off the box, slaps the word "puffery" on it and says "Look its not Fraud, See what it says there? Puffery...its nothing"

Like Hillary took classified e-mails declassified them then sent them?

 

[konradv]

Lol, with the liberal education system has raised a generation that needs safe places if they see or hear something they disagree with. Almost every college should be sued if Trump gets sued.

Hardly the same thing. One is a matter of social interactions and the other is Trump trying to empty your wallet, all the while saying he's doing you a favor. You know, like he's been doing since his presidential campaign started.

 

[Dragonlady]

No presumption of innocence in a civil suit? That's off the charts stupid. Anyone can sue anyone for anything. The rest of your steamy pile isn't worth my time.

Notice that Ron Goodman's family were successful in their wrongful death suit against OJ Simpson, whereas the criminal trial found him not guilty.

Anyone can't sue someone for anything. They can try, but a judge will throw it out if the judge thinks the suit is frivolous, or that you lack evidence. These suits have been ongoing for years, and at every stage, Trump has tried to have them dismissed, and to this point, all three continue, unabated. The judge has even given Trump the advantage of postponing the trials until after the Presidential election.

But he has released evidence that will be discussed during this election campaign.

You people are prepared to vilify the woman who is qualified and capable of leading the country and continuing the work Obama started, or you can vote for a man who has proven himself over and over again as a lying scam artist.

 

[jknowgood]

Lol, with the liberal education system has raised a generation that needs safe places if they see or hear something they disagree with. Almost every college should be sued if Trump gets sued.

Hardly the same thing. One is a matter of social interactions and the other is Trump trying to empty your wallet, all the while saying he's doing you a favor. You know, like he's been doing since his presidential campaign started.

Exactly as the liberal education system is doing and cost a lot more.

 

[Iceweasel]

No presumption of innocence in a civil suit? That's off the charts stupid. Anyone can sue anyone for anything. The rest of your steamy pile isn't worth my time.

Notice that Ron Goodman's family were successful in their wrongful death suit against OJ Simpson, whereas the criminal trial found him not guilty.

Anyone can't sue someone for anything. They can try, but a judge will throw it out if the judge thinks the suit is frivolous, or that you lack evidence. These suits have been ongoing for years, and at every stage, Trump has tried to have them dismissed, and to this point, all three continue, unabated. The judge has even given Trump the advantage of postponing the trials until after the Presidential election.

But he has released evidence that will be discussed during this election campaign.

You people are prepared to vilify the woman who is qualified and capable of leading the country and continuing the work Obama started, or you can vote for a man who has proven himself over and over again as a lying scam artist.

Suits aren't signs of guilt, you are full of shit. Judges often don't throw the case out until he's heard both sides. In court.

Hillary is incompetent and unethical has proven it. You can stuff your head into your safe space but that doesn't change anything. There are eight movies about her coming out soon, you should see them and inform yourself.

 

[Dragonlady]

Yes, anybody can sue for anything. & the evidence in a civil suit has to be shown to be a preponderance... hmmmm, it's not looking too good for Donny. BUT in a criminal trial there has to be evidence to show guilt beyond any reasonable doubt.

Hillary has never been found guilty of anything.

Not only has she never been found guilty of anything, even Kenneth Starr, who would have sold his soul to Lucifer himself if he could have pinned something on her, couldn't even get enough evidence to file charges against her. Starr even went so far as to reveal a White House mistress, something that has been off-limits in official Washington since Washington himself was President, in order to nail Bill.

Seven Benghazi investigations, but you are all convinced that four Americans died because of Hillary Clinton's failures, or you believe there is a massive cover-up. Seven REPUBLICAN investigations, which Hillary has tirelessly appeared at and even those investigations haven't uncovered a shred of evidence against her.

Everyone in Washington hates her, but nobody has turned evidence against her and Bill except Monica. Saint Ronnie had everybody in on his scandals testify against those involved, as did Nixon who had files on everyone, except Hoover. But nobody has ever turned on Bill and Hillary, the Teflon couple.

What you have is a 30 year old witch hunt against two people who have served their country tirelessly, by those who can't find an honest way to stop them.

 

[Dragonlady]

Suits aren't signs of guilt, you are full of shit. Judges often don't throw the case out until he's heard both sides. In court.

Hillary is incompetent and unethical has proven it. You can stuff your head into your safe space but that doesn't change anything. There are eight movies about her coming out soon, you should see them and inform yourself.

Suits aren't signs of guilt. Then why does Trump settle so many law suits? Because he can't win in court.

Trump’s Long Trail of Litigation

Edited to add: a large number of law suits filed by Trump, especially those involving libel or the Trump brand, have been dismissed before going to trial as frivalous.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

This is such an obvious political hit job using the judiciary for Clinton.

Get used to it. Trump's vocal and public disdain for the press, especially last week during a press conference where he reviled them in person on live television, has only unleashed the hounds on his arrogant, bigoted ass. He's so out of his depth....soooooo out of his depth.

But this guy Isikoff is hardly pro-Clinton, if you cared to dig beyond the headlines:
Uncovering Clinton

 

[g5000]

The Judge happens to belong to a group that is actively boycotting all things Trump. Did you know that?

No, he isn't.

 

[g5000]

Overcharge, hell yes. Tuition has skyrocketed. A student can go to a "legitimate" university and come away with a very expensive worthless degree. So I take the whole Trump U thing with a grain of salt.

That's because you haven't read the court documents. Trump knows you Chumps are too stupid and lazy to do so. He knows you have the attention span of goldfish.

 

[g5000]

The court documents show a pattern of fraud and racketeering. When you read them, you quickly realize Trump is going to lose.

Not only that, you realize Trump is no different than the guy on the sidewalk running a three card Monte con.

Trump is a complete huckster.

He's running the perfect con on his Chumps. A perfect con is when the mark has no idea he's been taken for a ride, and it completely depends on the rube having a powerful desire to believe the bullshit the con man tells him.