Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

surada said:
[video]
Click to expand...

Oh stop it....zimmerman is PART BLACK. The race card has gotten really old and really stupid. You are now claiming that a black hispanic was singling out other blacks for race harassment. Trayvon was a thief----a druggy---a violent thug describe by a black school police as suspicious as well. He was peeping into peoples houses and back yards casing the joint which came off as suspicious to Zimmerman and rightly so.

But yes, Trayvon fit the description of young black males breaking into homes and robbing them---oh fuck look, the young black male was a thief casing the joint. I sure hope that zimmerman wasn't so stupid that he would be looking for 90 year old females when the description says young black males were doing the crimes.
 
surada said:
No its not the Retreat at Twin Lakes is a gated a community of town homes.
Click to expand...
Oh stop it fool..........when these builders start a new community they do a mix of homes out here...townhomes, condos, single homes---it doesn't matter---just how much of a profit they can make off them. The whole area would have been a giant gated community.
 
I'd day that voting the left out is the solution, but all they do is "suddenly" find more votes after the voting centers have closed.
 
The Retreat At Twin Lakes - New Southern Properties

The Retreat At Twin Lakes

Twin Lakes is located off Oregon Avenue in Sanford FL. Originally developed by Engle, this gated community consists of two story townhomes with one car garages. Lennar Homes took over the project in 2009 and has just recently completed
www.newsouthernproperties.com www.newsouthernproperties.com

The Retreat At Twin Lakes. The Retreat At Twin Lakes is located off Oregon Avenue in Sanford FL. Originally developed by Engle, this gated community consists of two story townhomes with one car garages. Lennar Homes took over and completed the project in …
 
BackAgain said:
No. There was No such evidence presented. Pity you rely on repeating your lie. In a split second one of the gun-shot victims was struck in the groin and the back, but that doesn’t mean he was shot in the back. A twisting motion accounts for such apparent discrepancies.
Maybe you should consider honesty for a refreshing change of pace.
Click to expand...
Him consider honesty? You’d have better luck teaching a pig to sing.
 
Faun said:
That's correct, moron.
Click to expand...

I am just going to be honest here...I really get tired of this sort of childishness. I really don't know what you, (and others) think you are accomplishing by constantly throwing out these pejoratives...And yes, I have done it too, but I am going to try my best from here on out to cease that sort of crap...It accomplishes nothing. So, with that said let's try the rest of the post here....

It's not. If it were, juries could find a defendant of being innocent.
Click to expand...
That is absolutely true. And why? Because the presumption of any defendant is innocent. It is up to the prosecutor to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person is guilty.

My layman's take is that this prosecutor didn't do that.
 
BackAgain said:
Which goes to show you how evidence matters. Propagandistic “reporting” about what the actual evidence “showed” isn’t worth a thing. I’m pretty assured that not one juror who votes on a verdict in this case (either way) will be so silly as to believe that anyone was shot in the back or while lying down.
Click to expand...
They will see he was shot in the back and face down on the ground.
 
Faun said:
They will see he was shot in the back and face down on the ground.
Click to expand...
Not likely since that’s not the evidence. I have noted already (possibly on a different thread?) that it does indeed appear that he had a bullet wound in the back. My contention is that this does not mean he was shot in the back. Not a concept I think a person of your intellectual acumen can grasp.

but still. If A shoots B. A is in front of B. B gets shot in the front. Groin and hand. As this is happening B is not standing still. He is reaching for the rifle which A is holding. B is bent over. He can get shot in the back anyway because bodies bend and twist.
 
LuckyDuck said:
I'd day that voting the left out is the solution, but all they do is "suddenly" find more votes after the voting centers have closed.
Click to expand...

The solution to 98% of our political problems on the right is to divide this country into two countries instead. Libs on one side and conservatives on the other. See how long their country lasts with all of their policies in full play.
 
BackAgain said:
No. There was No such evidence presented. Pity you rely on repeating your lie. In a split second one of the gun-shot victims was struck in the groin and the back, but that doesn’t mean he was shot in the back. A twisting motion accounts for such apparent discrepancies.
Maybe you should consider honesty for a refreshing change of pace.
Click to expand...
Not my problem you didn't watch the trial or understand it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Why is racketeering/extortion ok in the Biden administration DOJ & AG Garland?

< Previous Thread

Rittenhouse

Next Thread >

Similar threads

Doc7505
Appeals Court Delivers MASSIVE Blow To Activist Judges
Replies
10
Views
183
Cellblock2429
Cellblock2429
R
who is kylow rittenhouse
Replies
9
Views
246
TNHarley
TNHarley
Doc7505
“Listen Carefully it’s Actually Much Darker”: How the Left is Framing Free Speech as a Front for Fascism
2 3 4
Replies
75
Views
820
Stryder50
S
Mr. Friscus
Congress grills Pete Hegseth
27 28 29
Replies
561
Views
4K
RetiredGySgt
RetiredGySgt
Foxfyre
100 Days of Hoaxes
Replies
18
Views
255
Billiejeens
B

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom