Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

[Faun]

No I said gthere is no evidence Rittenhouse shot him.

Others were shooting

You lyin' skeeze, yes, you denied he was shot in the back.

No one was shot in the back or face down you moron.

​

 

[Dirk the Daring]

As Tucker { Brilliant Legit Journalist } pointed out tonight as regarding the
comments by cushy CNN Black host Don Lemmon ... just switch around
what Lemmon said and ask what if Rittenhouse was Black and those attacking
him were also black.Then the Black Kid being chased and threatened by other blacks
should be treated as ... ?
That's what going on here ... Folks.
Pure Politics.If Rittenhouse was a leftie and his attackers were all Trump
supporters the entire narrative would change on a dime.

This is true, undoubtedly, but the fact is that it's true for BOTH SIDES. A LOT of stances on this board alone would do a full reverse.

 

[Dirk the Daring]

Nah, stay stupid.

Ah, so you can't back up your claims with actual evidence. Got it. Thanks for the admission.

 

[Dirk the Daring]

Idiot...

“I was alone, I pointed at him and he kept chasing me.” Kyle Rittenhouse​

"kept"

 

[Cecilie1200]

He or the other prosecutor will probably run for district attorney next election cycle.

I doubt that, actually. Given the complete lack of grace that characterizes the left, there's a really good chance they're screwed for failing the Holy Leftist Agenda.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Maybe his mommy should stop taking him to hang out at bars with the Proud Boys and should tell him to stop flashing white supremacy hand signals.

Maybe you should stop spewing your diseased imaginings as though they're real thoughts that serious people should be bothered with. But we never get that lucky.

 

[Soupnazi630]

You lyin' skeeze, yes, you denied he was shot in the back.

​

No you are lying I said there was no evidence Rittenhouse shot him in the back go ahead and paste my post you coward

 

[Cecilie1200]

I could be mistaken but I believe the fire he helped to extinguish was inside a dumpster that was then hurled towards a gas station, by Rosenbaum among others. And it was the extinguishing of said fire that put Kyle on Rosenbaum's radar, and ultimately led to the chase that eventually ended Rosenbaum's life. This is what I've pieced together from viewing the various footage angles/sources. ANYONE defending Rosenbaum's actions and criticizing Rittenhouse is a despicable waste of humanity. Including LeBron James.

LeBron James needs to come to terms with the reality that he's not valued for anything spewing from his head hole and the vast emptiness behind it, and stick to entertaining us like a good dancing monkey.

Frankly, the world would be a lot better off if our court jesters weren't allowed to flatter themselves that being famous is the same as important.

 

[Cecilie1200]

For those who somehow think that the riots ended when Kyle was arrested...

Think again...

For weeks they continued...the police department lost it's glass doors due to the continued rioting...they had to erect barriers to keep the rioters out. Things continued to be so out of control in Kenosha that Kyle had to go to Antioch Illinois to surrender to the police. There was no surrendering in Kenosha...not even weeks afterwards.

Even those who tried to visit the police station afterwards to offer up evidence they had he'd to fight their way through protesting crowds and through broken glass just to get harassed and intimidated by the DA when the evidence you provided didn't match up with the narrative the DA wanted to pursue. (Which is why so many of the photographers kept getting lawyers)

Then on top of this the DA has been less than honest with the media...he has been whipping up the liberal media outlets with outrageous claims and outright lies...of course requesting that he remain as an unidentified inside source for the information.

Which, to me, says that this prosecutor needs to go to jail himself for the abuse of office.

Were I that judge, I'd be filing a serious ethics complaint against that prosecutor with the Bar Association.

 

[Flash]

Judges instructions are listed here...

U.S. judge in Rittenhouse trial says jury can consider teen provoked attack

The judge in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse said on Friday he would instruct the jury they can consider the prosecution's argument that the teenager provoked an encounter with one of two men he fatally shot during protests in Wisconsin last year.

www.reuters.com

The Judge started out doing the right thing to insure justice for Kyle. However, that article in the New York Times came out and accused him of being racist. Then his attitude changed and he started to give the Prosecution everything they wanted.

Despicable, isn't it?

There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Kyle provoked anybody and the judge knows that. In fact just the opposite. It is a bias ruling that will cause a discussion in the jury that never should take place. One of the asshole Libtards on the jury could argue that Kyle "provoked" just by being there with the rifle and that is absolutely crazy knowing that the filthy ass protesters tht attacked him after doing the destruction in the city were the real provokers.

 

[JohnDB]

Were I that judge, I'd be filing a serious ethics complaint against that prosecutor with the Bar Association.

Oh not just the bar association...they can pull his shingle but it's beyond that...it's abuse of office...it's suborning purjery, using the weight of the justice system to abuse the citizens. Letting the system/process be the punishment that Kyle receives.

The prosecutor has behaved as if Kyle doesn't have any rights because of political views....that the average person matters.

Our justice system is built on the premise that it's better for ten guilty men go free than one innocent to be punished.
That's the basic focus. I may not like it that OJ Simpson went free...but it's better than punishing Kyle for defending himself.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Idiot...

“I was alone, I pointed at him and he kept chasing me.” Kyle Rittenhouse​

Context:

1. Ziminski fired his weapon into the air.

2. Rosenbaum then charged Rittenhouse

3. Rittenhouse attempted to flee, but Rosenbaum continued the pursuit.

4. Rosenbaum was given no other alternative but to attempt deterrence, which failed.

5. Rittenhouse shot and killed Rosenbaum in self-defense.

Rosenbaum was already chasing him.

Words "he kept" implies had been chasing him before that point.

Moreover the video I posted shows Rittenhouse pointing his arm, not his weapon at Rosenbaum and Ziminski.

Notably, when Ziminski fired into the air, that most certainly triggered Rittenhouse's fight or flight response. Because not soon after, Rosenbaum charged him, which led to the sequence of events in question.

Your argument is invalid.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Nah, stay stupid.

Nah, you don't need company.

 

[TemplarKormac]

 

[TemplarKormac]

 

[TemplarKormac]

 

[TemplarKormac]

 

[Faun]

Ah, so you can't back up your claims with actual evidence. Got it. Thanks for the admission.

No, I've backed it up. I just feel no need to back it up repeatedly every time some yahoo comes along and cries, nuh-uh!

 

[eddiew37]

Were I that judge, I'd be filing a serious ethics complaint against that prosecutor with the Bar Association.

Coming from a lying racist republican Defending a murderer who carried an AR 15

 

[eagle1462010]

Coming from a lying racist republican Defending a murderer who carried an AR 15

OMFG. You got the whole DNC platform agenda down in one Sentence.