Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

It appears that the Prosecution may well have been trying to throw the
case into a Mistrial.Instead of facing the embarrassment of losing on
acquittal.
And wouldn’t the judge realize that? I suspect that is why he is NOT throwing it to mistrial…..it’s better for Kyle to get an acquittal.
 
point proven in court.
Which goes to show you how evidence matters. Propagandistic “reporting” about what the actual evidence “showed” isn’t worth a thing. I’m pretty assured that not one juror who votes on a verdict in this case (either way) will be so silly as to believe that anyone was shot in the back or while lying down.
 
The Prosecution in this case are absolute idiots.

However, the Defense is not much better. Richards is sitting on ass most of the time. He should be much more aggressive than he his.
 
Seems you are arguing that a girl wearing a sexy dress to a biker bar is provoking rape. That cannot be how open carry laws are interpreted.
Goes back to a really good movie dealing in this area.
- Anatomy of a Murder - { 1959 } Starring Jimmy Stewart.
Directed by the difficult to work with Otto Preminger.
Where an Army Man is arrested after shooting and killing a bartender
for allegedly flirting and then raping his newlywed wife.Who was a known
flirt and very good at Lying.
 
There was NO community patrol and there was no rash of crimes at the Retreat. The crime wave was elsewhere in the community in single family residences and apartment complexes. Don't feel bad.. Zimmerman is stupid too.

Yes there was a community watch which Zimmerman was the head of. It's more than well documented if you'd like to see the links. Furthermore yes, the crimes were taking place in that gated community. It's not that big of a development They are all townhouses.
 
The Prosecution in this case are absolute idiots.

However, the Defense is not much better. Richards is sitting on ass most of the time. He should be much more aggressive than he his.
I agree, he let the prosecution lead witnesses over and over.
 
Which goes to show you how evidence matters. Propagandistic “reporting” about what the actual evidence “showed” isn’t worth a thing. I’m pretty assured that not one juror who votes on a verdict in this case (either way) will be so silly as to believe that anyone was shot in the back or while lying down.
In theory Rosenbaum was shot in the back. The shot entered his upper back and exited after going through (I believe) his lung, then kidney. The round went from top to bottom indicating Rosenbaum was leaning forward. According to the witness, when the final shot was fired Rosenbaum was lunging at Rittenhouse while attacking him. All four rounds were fired in under two seconds according to the videos. At no time did Rittenhouse fire at Rosenbaum from behind, or while he was on the ground. All that information is from PROSECUTION witnesses and evidence.
 
Yes there was a community watch which Zimmerman was the head of. It's more than well documented if you'd like to see the links. Furthermore yes, the crimes were taking place in that gated community. It's not that big of a development They are all townhouses.

Nope.. He was a "community watch" of one person and didn't follow ANY of the rules and protocols of Neighborhood Watch.

The crimes were NOT in the Retreat at Twin Lakes.. There are neighborhood apartment complexes and single family homes that were experiencing burglaries. You can look up the crime rates for those zip codes back then.. Also referred to as Twin Lakes in Sanford.
 
After Rosenbaum made death threats against Rittenhouse and had to be restrained by members of the crowd earlier. Not to mention chasing Rittenhouse down the street and attempting to ambush him by hiding behind parked cars. All facts entered into evidence by the PROSECUTION'S witnesses.
Rittenhouse wasn't involved when Rosenbaum was restrained. And being chased doesn't justify Rittenhouse pointing his gun at Rosenbaum.
 
Rittenhouse wasn't involved when Rosenbaum was restrained. And being chased doesn't justify Rittenhouse pointing his gun at Rosenbaum.

The Marine Corp recruiter turned Rittenhouse down.. They got a whif of something that made him unsuitable.
 
In theory Rosenbaum was shot in the back. The shot entered his upper back and exited after going through (I believe) his lung, then kidney. The round went from top to bottom indicating Rosenbaum was leaning forward. According to the witness, when the final shot was fired Rosenbaum was lunging at Rittenhouse while attacking him. All four rounds were fired in under two seconds according to the videos. At no time did Rittenhouse fire at Rosenbaum from behind, or while he was on the ground. All that information is from PROSECUTION witnesses and evidence.
yep, and in no way did he point his weapon anywhere near or at McGinniss. No bullet went his way. The fat fk prosecutor used the bullet from the one that hit rosenbaum's head, the autopsy doctor said the shot was top of head down. So factually, he is fking wrong.
 
Last edited:
The Marine Corp recruiter turned Rittenhouse down.. They got a whif of something that made him unsuitable.
they wouldn't turn him down today. he represented great skills.
 
Holding the rifle in the low ready position. What is that object he's standing in front of though?
well it's not 3d so no one can see shit. They haven't proved he provoked rosenbaum in that photo, he's not in the shot. So, what is it the prosecution is saying is they can see everything when no one can see shit. pathetic. the fat fk repeatedly said "I can" when everyone else said, huh? the more funny part was when the fat fk said it was blurry to him. hahahahahahahahahahhahaha
 
Last edited:
then where were they?
why bag on Kyle for going 20 miles to help defends a friend's business and ignore the rioters n looters were from much further away?
Agree. There are so many much more vicious, indefensible attacks carried out every day, and yet the Left is venting their rage on a white teen who defended himself against a felon.

Where‘s the outrage for the following, where six men put a 62-year-old man into critical condition - for no reason at all:
 
Back
Top Bottom