Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

No he wasn't defending anyone's property.. They turned him down. He was a stupid kid with a gun who traveled to another state to play vigilante.. He killed two people and crippled a third.

Who made the bigger mistake? A teenager with a gun or the ones who attacked him? The results speak for themselves.

 

[Clipper]

See: Blue oval to the right

View attachment 562648

So what?

 

[Billiejeens]

i'm sure that would have worked. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOIL

There is literally nothing that can be done with that one.
Just ignore it.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

How long have you had this ability to know what others are thinking? The kid was 17. He made a mistake in being there but kids do that...often... You no more know his true motivations than anyone else and your OPINION would see him in prison for life. I suppose you think that none of those three rioters have ANY culpability for the situation? People who are "looking for an altercation" don't typically try to flee. The two who died, did so from an overdose of stupidity.

Seems like the stupidity was all around that night.

I don't have to know what others are thinking when they pickup an AR-15, attend a riot where everybody else is against you, start antagonizing the participants by cleaning up the mess they made of buildings, putting out the fires they just set, and trying to protect some car lot. It's not like he was with another group of people on his side equal to the amount of rioters. It was him and his buddy.

Yes, kids will make mistakes like going to where they're not supposed to be, but not armed with an AR. I never did that as a kid, did you?

As for the rioters they should be arrested and pay whatever price for the damage they did, but so should this kid. I don't think he should be in prison for the rest of his life, but I think the jury should consider manslaughter charges. And it's not my opinion, it's my training. Wisconsin law does not give self-defense with a firearm unlimited protection. When you intentionally put yourself in a position you will likely use that firearm, it makes self-defense null and void. The law specifically states you are covered under self-defense only if you took every precaution to avoid using the firearm you are carrying. Rittenhouse did the exact opposite. The prosecution not telling the jury about their laws makes it clear to me he is throwing this case on purpose.

 

[progressive hunter]

Seems like the stupidity was all around that night.

I don't have to know what others are thinking when they pickup an AR-15, attend a riot where everybody else is against you, start antagonizing the participants by cleaning up the mess they made of buildings, putting out the fires they just set, and trying to protect some car lot. It's not like he was with another group of people on his side equal to the amount of rioters. It was him and his buddy.

Yes, kids will make mistakes like going to where they're not supposed to be, but not armed with an AR. I never did that as a kid, did you?

As for the rioters they should be arrested and pay whatever price for the damage they did, but so should this kid. I don't think he should be in prison for the rest of his life, but I think the jury should consider manslaughter charges. And it's not my opinion, it's my training. Wisconsin law does not give self-defense with a firearm unlimited protection. When you intentionally put yourself in a position you will likely use that firearm, it makes self-defense null and void. The law specifically states you are covered under self-defense unless you took every precaution to avoid using the firearm you are carrying. Rittenhouse did the exact opposite. The prosecution not telling the jury about their laws makes it clear to me he is throwing this case on purpose.

ray you ever gonna show the evidence he was acting as a vigilante and trying to arrest or stop people??

 

[ConserveGuy]

To say he should not have been there doesn't make sense. It was all in public property. Besides the commercial businesses he was defending. He had every right to be there walking if he wanted. Just like the looters and rioters were able to. But they were actually causing havoc to where self defense is necessary when it comes to your life at stake. Do not fault him for being there.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It was common knowledge for WEEKS ahead of this tragedy that average Americans who were in the wrong place at the wrong time, were being beat down, stomped out and several, killed due to the lawlessness. He had EVERY RIGHT to be armed and every right to support the local community. If you think the majority of people are going to continue to just shut up and let Leftist/Marxist scum attack and burn our cities, then you have some surprises in store.

It's their cities so they can do whatever they want. He did not have the right to act as a police officer guarding businesses and putting out fires. He not only did not live there, he didn't even live in the same state. No, he had no right to be armed either. A minor is not allowed to have a firearm in public. That's against the law making him no less of a criminal than the rioters.

It's one thing if you unknowingly end up in the wrong place at the wrong time, and quite another when you plan to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. He waived his right to self-defense with a firearm in that state and most others across the US.

 

[Billiejeens]

ray you ever gonna show the evidence he was acting as a vigilante and trying to arrest or stop people??

He won't and can't

Not sure why he is so far off course on this one.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

ray you ever gonna show the evidence he was acting as a vigilante and trying to arrest or stop people??

Where did you see me use the word arrest? Vigilantism is the act of taking the law in your own hands.

 

[progressive hunter]

It's their cities so they can do whatever they want. He did not have the right to act as a police officer guarding businesses and putting out fires. He not only did not live there, he didn't even live in the same state. No, he had no right to be armed either. A minor is not allowed to have a firearm in public. That's against the law making him no less of a criminal than the rioters.

It's one thing if you unknowingly end up in the wrong place at the wrong time, and quite another when you plan to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. He waived his right to self-defense with a firearm in that state and most others across the US.

ray police officers dont protect building or put out fires,,,

also if you watched his testimony you would know most of his family lived there including hos father that he stayed with part time,,

 

[Billiejeens]

To say he should not have been there doesn't make sense. It was all in public property. Besides the commercial businesses he was defending. He had every right to be there walking if he wanted. Just like the looters and rioters were able to. But they were actually causing havoc to where self defense is necessary when it comes to your life at stake. Do not fault him for being there.

They keep saying -he crossed the state line to get there

If one looks at a map it's probably a 30 minute drive
takes longer than that to go across a big city

 

[progressive hunter]

Where did you see me use the word arrest? Vigilantism is the act of taking the law in your own hands.

OK when did he take the law into his own hands??

 

[Billiejeens]

ray police officers dont protect building or put out fires,,,

also if you watched his testimony you would know most of his family lived there including hos father that he stayed with part time,,

Absolutely -

Police arrive after the crime and document it - that's it.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

OK when did he take the law into his own hands??

By addressing rioters armed, putting out fires and acting like police to protect private property. Citizens don't do that. It's what the police are for.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

ray police officers dont protect building or put out fires,,,

also if you watched his testimony you would know most of his family lived there including hos father that he stayed with part time,,

So what? If my aunt lives in New Jersey that doesn't give me the right to run around with a gun trying to clean up the streets. So where was his father anyway? How far away did he live from where the riots were?

If we are going to let kids run around with guns instead of depending on the legal authorities we use to address these problems, then we've taken a leap towards an uncivilized society.

 

[ConserveGuy]

They keep saying -he crossed the state line to get there

If one looks at a map it's probably a 30 minute drive
takes longer than that to go across a big city

With his dad residing in Kenosha. He can technically call it his other home. So that whole state line argument the attorney is talking about should be no concern.

 

[progressive hunter]

By addressing rioters armed, putting out fires and acting like police to protect private property. Citizens don't do that. It's what the police are for.

you mean the police that stood down and allowed the riots and damage to property to happen???

yeah thats when the people need to stand up and kyle did just that and only put out fires and helped people that were injured,,

he never once tried to stop anyone from damaging property,,

 

[progressive hunter]

So what? If my aunt lives in New Jersey that doesn't give me the right to run around with a gun trying to clean up the streets. So where was his father anyway? How far away did he live from where the riots were?

If we are going to let kids run around with guns instead of depending on the legal authorities we use to address these problems, then we've taken a leap towards an uncivilized society.

of course you have the right to clean up streets and put out fires while also helping people that were injured,,,

and those legal authorities youre talking about abandoned their posts and allowed the riots to happen,,

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

of course you have the right to clean up streets and put out fires while also helping people that were injured,,,

and those legal authorities youre talking about abandoned their posts and allowed the riots to happen,,

That doesn't deputize you and give you the legal authority to take their place. Clean up? Yes you can. Wait until everybody goes home and there is no danger and then clean up.

 

[Calypso Jones]

EVERYONE even kids are allowed to defend THEMSELVES. The fact that some of you keep harping on denying him that right tells me you got nothing and you know you got nothing.