Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

But since not one threatened Rittenhouse with a weapon, there was no intent to harm, much less kill.
The only one with the deadly threat to others was Rittenhouse.

So, if I have a weapon, and you don't, and I am not threatening you, but then YOU try to take my weapon....I am the deadly threat?

Do you not see how an aggressor taking your weapon is life threatening?

 

[ColonelAngus]

Matters not if it seems reasonable to a fucking moron like you. It only matters what the jury finds reasonable.

We really need to stop feeding this troll.

This posters trolls are not even funny. He just insults other posters. Its brain dead.

DERP!

FAUN IS STUPID! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

That is the intellectual level of his roasting.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Matters not if it seems reasonable to a fucking moron like you. It only matters what the jury finds reasonable.

Is it reasonable to stop an attacker trying to take your weapon?

 

[bripat9643]

Matters not if it seems reasonable to a fucking moron like you. It only matters what the jury finds reasonable.

Nope, according to the law it matters what the person defending himself believes. Jurors are supposed to follow the law, not just arrive at a verdict sans any constraints whatsoever.

 

[maybelooking]

We really need to stop feeding this troll.

This posters trolls are not even funny. He just insults other posters. Its brain dead.

DERP!

FAUN IS STUPID! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

That is the intellectual level of his roasting.

been on my ignore for quite some time. along with several others.

 

[Faun]

The prosecutor's witness clarified all of that and said that Rittenhouse only fired when Rosenbaum lunged at him.

Did you see that?

False, that's not what he said. He said the lunge started before the first shot and that he couldn't discern if Rosenbaum fell towards ground because he was shot or because he was unable to maintain his balance.

 

[progressive hunter]

Of course it matters where they hit. Someone who is face down after being shot 3 times is no longer a threat. Shooting them a 4th time in the back is excessive force.

I never said it mattered or didnt matter,, and no one testified he was down when he was shot,,,

 

[ColonelAngus]

been on my ignore for quite some time. along with several others.

Yea, I have done that with quite a few.

There are VERY few lefties on here that are not flat out trolls.

 

[Faun]

Nope, according to the law it matters what the person defending himself believes. Jurors are supposed to follow the law, not just arrive at a verdict sans any constraints whatsoever.

Fucking moron, "reasonable belief" is what an ordinary and prudent person finds reasonable. That will be the 12 ordinary and prudent jury members who will decide Rittenhouse's fate.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Nope, according to the law it matters what the person defending himself believes. Jurors are supposed to follow the law, not just arrive at a verdict sans any constraints whatsoever.

Yes. Correct.


939.48  Self-defense and defense of others.
939.48(1)(1)  A person is privileged to threaten or intentionally use force against another for the purpose of preventing or terminating what the person reasonably believes to be an unlawful interference with his or her person by such other person. The actor may intentionally use only such force or threat thereof as the actor reasonably believes is necessary to prevent or terminate the interference. The actor may not intentionally use force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm unless the actor reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Fucking moron, "reasonable belief" is what an ordinary and prudent person finds reasonable. That will be the 12 ordinary and prudent jury members who will decide Rittenhouse's fate.

Either you are a straight up troll or you are REALLY bad at this.

See post #610 - what the actor reasonably believes

Was it unreasonable for Rittenhouse to believe that Rosenbaum was going to take his rifle and kill him with it....AFTER Rosenbaum had threated to kill him and others prior to the event, and Rosenbaum chased Rittenhouse across the parking lot and tried to take his weapon?

You can only answer that it was unreasonable if you are nothing more than a gun-hating kuuunt (you are).

 

[ColonelAngus]

Fucking moron, "reasonable belief" is what an ordinary and prudent person finds reasonable. That will be the 12 ordinary and prudent jury members who will decide Rittenhouse's fate.

This poster thinks every conservative is on trial.

What a fucking moron.

 

[jc456]

No one else felt he was a real threat. Only Kyle.

then why did he ambush Kyle and chase him?

 

[jc456]

Either you are a straight up troll or you are REALLY bad at this.

See post #610 - what the actor reasonably believes

Was it unreasonable for Rittenhouse to believe that Rosenbaum was going to take his rifle and kill him with it....AFTER Rosenbaum had threated to kill him and others prior to the event, and Rosenbaum chased Rittenhouse across the parking lot and tried to take his weapon?

You can only answer that it was unreasonable if you are nothing more than a gun-hating kuuunt (you are).

well perhaps they can tell us why Rosenbaum ambushed and chased Rittenhouse, and nobody else.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Fucking moron, tell Rosenbaum that isn't him lying face down with a bullet hole in his back that perforated his lung and killed him...

View attachment 561735​

He was shot face to face with Rittenhouse you uneducated idiot it was captured on video and proven.

Suck it up BOY you are out of your league and a total dumbass

 

[Soupnazi630]

It's not reasonable to shoot someone in the back who is face down who is no longer a threat.

And Rittenhouse had a reasonable means to escape while Rosenbaum was face down before being shot in the back.

Rittenhouse shot no one ion the backyou dipshit

 

[jc456]

Rittenhouse shot no one ion the backyou dipshit

yep, already shown that didn't happen. anyone saying it after the testimony are merely stupid asses instigating in a message board, and Mods should remove them.

 

[maybelooking]

This is why we have trials. Even with them on ignore its easy to see by the responses to the trolls that they have very strong "feelings" about this case.

Fortunately......FUCK YOUR FEELINGS is basically how the legal system works. FACTS AND EVIDENCE is what is required.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

been on my ignore for quite some time. along with several others.

I put him on there a few years ago. I gave him one chance in that time and told him I'd be happy to discuss politics without the constant personal insults. He was okay for a week or two and back to the insults so he's been on iggy ever since.

A zebra doesn't change it's stripes I guess.

 

[maybelooking]

I put him on there a few years ago. I gave him one chance in that time and told him I'd be happy to discuss politics without the constant personal insults. He was okay for a week or two and back to the insults so he's been on iggy ever since.

A zebra doesn't change it's stripes I guess.

You and I agree on almost everything. And even though we dont agree on this particular topic, you are respectful and not a troll.