- Thread starter
- #141
It proves that political campaigns will go out of their way to get dirt on the opposition. I was reminded earlier today that the DNC met with an actual government official from the Ukraine in order to receive information on Trump, but I don't see the media or the left getting bent out of shape on that.But whether Goldstone lied or not, Junior and Manafort and Kushner agreed to be at the meeting, as if it were true and this was a meeting with a lawyer of the Russian government...Well, if he said it then it must be true, right? I mean, it's not possible that he lied.The person/friend of Jr that set up the meeting SAID SHE WAS A GOVERNMENT LAWYER....no one from the Democratic side made that up....What? When did the story get changed to "The lawyer was a government lawyer?"the lawyer was a government lawyer
Jr worked for the campaign
he was offered dirt on an opponent
he accepted the offer
he met in private with the government lawyer
collusion or conspiracy
either way, what was said and who said it, is irrelevant.. the BASIC FRAMEWORK is all there in the eyes of the law ... legal, or illegal definition pending.
She is a lawyer in Russia, not for Russia.
The person setting up the meeting lied to the Trump campaign and said she had information that was from the Russian government. That is not a 'government lawyer'.
He accepted a meeting to hear information on Hilary Clinton.
He accepted nothing from this lawyer and in fact, left when he realized they had lied to him.
I think you clowns on the left need to get your narrative straight. So far, I see no collusion or crime.
and side by side in the meeting, a possible quid pro quo, is we will supply dirt on Hillary if you help get the sanctions removed so we can start Russian adoptions again
junior's responses show that he was aware of the meeting before the email chain he gave us, and aware already the Russian govt was giving their support to his father....
Apples and oranges. Educate yourself.
Did the Clinton campaign collude with Ukraine?