King Charles to Address Congress on April 28

[shockedcanadian]

I see the British monarchy as a joke. But I don’t care if he speaks to our Congress. I also don’t see any reason for his arrest (even if it were legally possible).

Now, his brother, on the other hand … maybe.

Errr, why would he be arrested?

 

[BackAgain]

Errr, why would he be arrested?

Prince Andrew? Quite clear already.

Or maybe you mean the King. And, I have no idea. I was just responding to another post. I don’t get that, either.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Prince Andrew? Quite clear already.

Or maybe you mean the King. And, I have no idea. I was just responding to another post. I don’t get that, either.

Yeah you referred to the king in your response, that made no sense. Prince Andrew perhaps but the U.S would not do that either,.even if he visited which he probably would not.

 

[BackAgain]

Yeah you referred to the king in your response, that made no sense. Prince Andrew perhaps but the U.S would not do that either,.even if he visited which he probably would not.

Yes. I did make a mention of the King after it was mentioned in the post I was referencing.

I had no clue what he was talking about. I still don’t.

If the U.S. chooses to prosecute, Andy, I vaguely recall reading that “the Crown” will not interfere. If any of the behavior attributed to Andy took place on U.S. soil, we would have a valid argument for jurisdiction. Even of the Crown chose to intercede on the basis of “diplomatic immunity,” I don’t believe they can show that Andy’s visits with Epstein were matters of state.

 

[MisterBeale]

That was a crime? I thought you loved muzzies, they are your brothers in arms against your mortal enemy, the Jews.

You seem upset about something. Is kicking puppies and stealing candy from children not giving you the same joy it once used to?

 

[shockedcanadian]

Yes. I did make a mention of the King after it was mentioned in the post I was referencing.

I had no clue what he was talking about. I still don’t.

If the U.S. chooses to prosecute, Andy, I vaguely recall reading that “the Crown” will not interfere. If any of the behavior attributed to Andy took place on U.S. soil, we would have a valid argument for jurisdiction. Even of the Crown chose to intercede on the basis of “diplomatic immunity,” I don’t believe they can show that Andy’s visits with Epstein were matters of state.

I will be honest, I do not understand this visit to America by the king. It does not help Trump politically, in fact, based on some American patriot comments online they do not like the idea. It does not help the king baxk home now with Trump eviscerating Starmer publicly. The visit occurs at an inconvenient time, right before America celebrates with exuberance and pride its 250 years of independence.