Keep Protestors Away From Trump and Trump Supporters

[August West]

Gas them, bust some heads or whatever makes you feel tough. Trump will not be the next president and that`s all that matters.

 

[Katzndogz]

The greater good is more violence, greater violence and certainly more Mexican flags.

When Emmanuel Cleaver and Larry Sabato say this looks like Trump is right, you know that the greater good is being served. The pain from these riots is just temporary.

 

[edthecynic]

Trump is WTF happened to us. Trump sewed the seeds of violence and now he is reaping the harvest he wanted.

Bullshit, and that is a half-baked excuse for stupid, criminal behavior. Kick the crap out of these violent street thugs, lock them up and no TV, radio, computer, or music. Let them read Trump's website and his latest book, Crippled America.

Trump owns all the violence on his watch. He inspired it, so now he owns it.

 

[Juicin]

You know anything about the history of this country?

All the founding fathers worried about was getting lynched by a mob, lol

Convention in 68, chicago? I think it was 68 either way shit is as old as time. They smash cop cars up for sports games out there

During the Vietnam War, cops in Washington DC, New York, and Chicago used to smash protestors heads, arms and legs. That's what needs to happen now. Trump should avoid going to cities with liberal mayors who tell their cops to stand down. Go to cities where the cops are told to KICK ASS.

Oh yea that's a great idea old man, let's send in the police to beat down protestors who are no more violent than trump supporters

Great idea, that will really foster trust in the state.

Idiot...

 

[Stephanie]

isn't it Funny how they can rope off reporters for Hilly Clinton.
http://nypost.com/2015/07/05/hillary-clinton-ropes-off-reporters-at-fourth-of-july-parade/


but they can't keep agitators for the Dnc/unions off a Republican political rally?

something stinks in the country and it's not Republicans.

 

[eagle1462010]

New reality TV series..........Water Cannoning Protesters...............Objective to knock down the most protesters with the least amount of water...........bonus scores if they wind up in a drain gutter.

Each contestant will get 2 minutes to knock as many protester down as possible. Video replays to verify those knocked down. Winner gets to be a Trump Delegate at the Convention and a trophy that pictures a water cannon.

Hell of a show that would be...............Better than the day time cereals we have now.

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

isn't it Funny how they can rope off reporters for Hilly Clinton.
http://nypost.com/2015/07/05/hillary-clinton-ropes-off-reporters-at-fourth-of-july-parade/


but they can't keep agitators for the Dnc/unions off a Republican political rally?

something stinks in the country and it's not Republicans.

False comparison fallacy, red herring fallacy, and an ignorant, ridiculous lie.

Clinton and Trump are afforded the same level of security.

What ‘stinks’ is the propensity of most on the right to lie, this this post being one of many examples.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The protests against Donald Trump of the last 2 days have shown a lack of preparedness on the part of police regarding crowd control. No protester should ever be able to smash the windows of a police car. They should not be able to throw eggs or anything else at police or anyone else. They should not be allowed to get close enough to attack Donald Trump (or any candidate) , to his supporters.

When George Bush came to Tampa a few years ago, protesters weren't able to get with 3 blocks of the building Bush was driven to. They were hustled off to a "free speech zone" 3 blocks away, and held their protest there. Some people complained that it was a violation of free speech. I differ with that. Not all speech is free. Freedom of speech is one of the parts of the Constitution that is riddled with exceptions >> slander, libel, perjury, sedition, obscenity laws, child pornography, threats, fighting words, inciting a riot, etc.

In the case of the anti-Trump protesters, they have more than shown their hand enough for there to be preventive measures taken. There should be no anti-Trump protesting in the vicinity of the building (including parking lots) where Trump is scheduled to appear. Simple as that. Anyone protesting with the perimeter area should be subject to arrest.

I'm wondering if the leniency of the police we're seeing in some of these cities (Chicago, Costa Mesa, Burlingame, etc) are a result of deliberate semi-stand down policies of liberal mayors. Maybe we need a national ruling on this. Well, if we have to go to Obama for that, I guess we can forget that idea.

Might be interesting to research if there already are laws of that sort in California, Indiana, and other states.

Wrong.

The right to free speech or freedom of assembly cannot be infringed solely because government believes someone might engage in speech or assembly that is not subject to First Amendment protections.

Anti-Trump protesters cannot be kept from Trump events by the police for no other reason than being anti-Trump protesters.

As long as protesters do not cross the line into the realm of speech or action not subject to Constitutional protections, they have every right to be at a Trump event along with Trump supporters, where that right cannot be preempted by government because of who the protesters are or the nature of their protest.

Moreover, the notion that Trump is being subject to some sort of ‘double standard’ with regard to affording him protection, or that local jurisdictions are not affording Trump adequate protection because you incorrectly perceive them as ‘liberal’ fails as a speculation fallacy, devoid of any evidence in support.

 

[The VOR]

isn't it Funny how they can rope off reporters for Hilly Clinton.
http://nypost.com/2015/07/05/hillary-clinton-ropes-off-reporters-at-fourth-of-july-parade/


but they can't keep agitators for the Dnc/unions off a Republican political rally?

something stinks in the country and it's not Republicans.

You are a pathetic, uneducated , ignorant, gullible, brain dead moron, and that is being nice about it.

 

[JOSweetHeart]

They aren't "protestors", they are rioting criminals.

Amen to this. To me, a true protester would only go so far. Going absolutely crazy on other people in my opinion will only make them other people keep their distance from whatever it is that you stand for even more.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

 

[PredFan]

They aren't "protestors", they are rioting criminals.

Amen to this. To me, a true protester would only go so far. Going absolutely crazy on other people in my opinion will only make them other people keep their distance from whatever it is that you stand for even more.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

As soon as you start destruction, you are a criminal.

 

[JOSweetHeart]

^^^ I agree. Which is why I think that a true protester would only go so far. Are things like an election matter really worth going to jail over?

God bless you always!!!

Holly

 

[Stephanie]

This is ridiculous. Show your protesting at the voting booths, not acting like idiots screaming at candidates no matter how much you don't want them. WTF happened to us??

You know anything about the history of this country?

All the founding fathers worried about was getting lynched by a mob, lol

Convention in 68, chicago? I think it was 68 either way shit is as old as time. They smash cop cars up for sports games out there

what? we haven't become more civilized since then? good grief it's the left who does this violent protesting. they did it with Bush and here they are again. Freedom of speech and to protest for them: but the hell with all you who wants to go to a peaceful political event.

 

[protectionist]

Gas them, bust some heads or whatever makes you feel tough. Trump will not be the next president and that`s all that matters.

Nobody has any way of knowing that Trump won't be the next president. So when they proclaim that he won't, what they are really proclaiming is that they are scared shitless that he IS going to be president.

 

[protectionist]

Trump owns all the violence on his watch. He inspired it, so now he owns it.

HA HA HA. And I suppose all the money flowing from the Soros coffers has no inspiration, huh ? Frankly, wherever it is inspired from, it's doing a great job of pilling up the votes for Trump, as he becomes more and more popular with every one of these lowlife mobs doing their dirty work. As for the Mexican flags, with each wave of them, comes another 1000 votes for Trump. Keep waving that rotten rag, wetbacks.

 

[protectionist]

Oh yea that's a great idea old man, let's send in the police to beat down protestors who are no more violent than trump supporters

Great idea, that will really foster trust in the state.

Idiot...

You are the idiot, as everyone here knows I'm not talking about peaceful protestors, and am talking about traffic blockers, egg throwers, rock throwers, fist throwers, police car vandalizers, etc. You're not a very good liar. And trust in the state isn't the issue, Mr Deflection. Maintaining LAW & ORDER is.

As for your age bigotry. We'll keep that in mind.

 

[protectionist]

New reality TV series..........Water Cannoning Protesters...............Objective to knock down the most protesters with the least amount of water...........bonus scores if they wind up in a drain gutter.

Each contestant will get 2 minutes to knock as many protester down as possible. Video replays to verify those knocked down. Winner gets to be a Trump Delegate at the Convention and a trophy that pictures a water cannon.

Hell of a show that would be...............Better than the day time cereals we have now.

No argument from me on all that.

As for the ones who throw the eggs, first handcuff their hands behind their backs. Then loosen their belts a little. Pull out the pants in the front (stomach area). Drop about 10 eggs into each violent protestors pants, tighten the belt back up and punch hard at the spot just below the belt (with the eggs inside). sit back and laugh rest of the day.

 

[PredFan]

 

[protectionist]

The protests against Donald Trump of the last 2 days have shown a lack of preparedness on the part of police regarding crowd control. No protester should ever be able to smash the windows of a police car. They should not be able to throw eggs or anything else at police or anyone else. They should not be allowed to get close enough to attack Donald Trump (or any candidate) , to his supporters.

When George Bush came to Tampa a few years ago, protesters weren't able to get with 3 blocks of the building Bush was driven to. They were hustled off to a "free speech zone" 3 blocks away, and held their protest there. Some people complained that it was a violation of free speech. I differ with that. Not all speech is free. Freedom of speech is one of the parts of the Constitution that is riddled with exceptions >> slander, libel, perjury, sedition, obscenity laws, child pornography, threats, fighting words, inciting a riot, etc.

In the case of the anti-Trump protesters, they have more than shown their hand enough for there to be preventive measures taken. There should be no anti-Trump protesting in the vicinity of the building (including parking lots) where Trump is scheduled to appear. Simple as that. Anyone protesting with the perimeter area should be subject to arrest.

I'm wondering if the leniency of the police we're seeing in some of these cities (Chicago, Costa Mesa, Burlingame, etc) are a result of deliberate semi-stand down policies of liberal mayors. Maybe we need a national ruling on this. Well, if we have to go to Obama for that, I guess we can forget that idea.

Might be interesting to research if there already are laws of that sort in California, Indiana, and other states.

Wrong.

The right to free speech or freedom of assembly cannot be infringed solely because government believes someone might engage in speech or assembly that is not subject to First Amendment protections.

Anti-Trump protesters cannot be kept from Trump events by the police for no other reason than being anti-Trump protesters.

As long as protesters do not cross the line into the realm of speech or action not subject to Constitutional protections, they have every right to be at a Trump event along with Trump supporters, where that right cannot be preempted by government because of who the protesters are or the nature of their protest.

Moreover, the notion that Trump is being subject to some sort of ‘double standard’ with regard to affording him protection, or that local jurisdictions are not affording Trump adequate protection because you incorrectly perceive them as ‘liberal’ fails as a speculation fallacy, devoid of any evidence in support.

THEY have ALREADY crossed the line.

As for your "speculation fallacy" notion, is that intended to be comedy ? After the stand downs of Ferguson, Baltimore, Chicago, and now repeated ones in California, few things are more evident than the violent character and dangers the anti-Trumpers and other leftist turds present. One of law enforcement's duties is to PROTECT the public, and rather than police standing down, they should be kicking ass.

This will not happen however, because the creeps who engage in these violent "protests", are too cowardly to show up in a city where police are governed by conservatives, and where police would kick their pitiful asses. They will only show up in places like New York, Baltimore, Chicago, San Francisco, etc, run by liberals, where liberal bosses have police hands tied, and they can get away with acting like the lowlifes that they are.