Keep Protestors Away From Trump and Trump Supporters

False comparison fallacy, red herring fallacy, and an ignorant, ridiculous lie.

Clinton and Trump are afforded the same level of security.

What ‘stinks’ is the propensity of most on the right to lie, this this post being one of many examples.

What ‘stinks’ is you lying by pretending that she isn't correct. Take a bath.
 
The protests against Donald Trump of the last 2 days have shown a lack of preparedness on the part of police regarding crowd control. No protester should ever be able to smash the windows of a police car. They should not be able to throw eggs or anything else at police or anyone else. They should not be allowed to get close enough to attack Donald Trump (or any candidate) , to his supporters.

When George Bush came to Tampa a few years ago, protesters weren't able to get with 3 blocks of the building Bush was driven to. They were hustled off to a "free speech zone" 3 blocks away, and held their protest there. Some people complained that it was a violation of free speech. I differ with that. Not all speech is free. Freedom of speech is one of the parts of the Constitution that is riddled with exceptions >> slander, libel, perjury, sedition, obscenity laws, child pornography, threats, fighting words, inciting a riot, etc.

In the case of the anti-Trump protesters, they have more than shown their hand enough for there to be preventive measures taken. There should be no anti-Trump protesting in the vicinity of the building (including parking lots) where Trump is scheduled to appear. Simple as that. Anyone protesting with the perimeter area should be subject to arrest.

I'm wondering if the leniency of the police we're seeing in some of these cities (Chicago, Costa Mesa, Burlingame, etc) are a result of deliberate semi-stand down policies of liberal mayors. Maybe we need a national ruling on this. Well, if we have to go to Obama for that, I guess we can forget that idea.

Might be interesting to research if there already are laws of that sort in California, Indiana, and other states.
No one should be getting close to Presidential candidates.
 
You can pretty much predict where the gooneybirds are going to show up. In Chicago, New York, Baltimore, and wherever there is liberal city government, tying the hands of the police. Trump ought to pick his rally cities by who is the mayor of them. Got a mayor like Rahm Emanuel or Bill DeBlasio ? Stay away. Got one like Rudy Giuliani ? Go there.
 
You can pretty much predict where the gooneybirds are going to show up. In Chicago, New York, Baltimore, and wherever there is liberal city government, tying the hands of the police. Trump ought to pick his rally cities by who is the mayor of them. Got a mayor like Rahm Emanuel or Bill DeBlasio ? Stay away. Got one like Rudy Giuliani ? Go there.
 
You can pretty much predict where the gooneybirds are going to show up. In Chicago, New York, Baltimore, and wherever there is liberal city government, tying the hands of the police. Trump ought to pick his rally cities by who is the mayor of them. Got a mayor like Rahm Emanuel or Bill DeBlasio ? Stay away. Got one like Rudy Giuliani ? Go there.

Meh, I wish Trump would have a speech a day in a different California city from now until the primary. Watch those criminals burn that whole state.
 
Solutions for unruly protestors >>>

soylent-green.jpg


More solutions >>>

upload_2016-4-30_18-26-49.jpeg
upload_2016-4-30_18-27-8.jpeg
images
images
images
 
The Donald goes out of his way to excite and provoke people with the outrageous things he says in public.

He doesn't get to pick and choose how people react to what he says. Since what he has chosen to say could be possibly the most outrageous things ever in a presidential primary campaign it doesn't surprise me that he gets energetic reaction by both his supporters AND detractors.
 
The Donald goes out of his way to excite and provoke people with the outrageous things he says in public.

He doesn't get to pick and choose how people react to what he says. Since what he has chosen to say could be possibly the most outrageous things ever in a presidential primary campaign it doesn't surprise me that he gets energetic reaction by both his supporters AND detractors.
"Hey, that guy said something i dont like, lets attack a bunch of people that arent him and lets smash up cars and vandalize some shit."
 
The protests against Donald Trump of the last 2 days have shown a lack of preparedness on the part of police regarding crowd control. No protester should ever be able to smash the windows of a police car. They should not be able to throw eggs or anything else at police or anyone else. They should not be allowed to get close enough to attack Donald Trump (or any candidate) , to his supporters.

When George Bush came to Tampa a few years ago, protesters weren't able to get with 3 blocks of the building Bush was driven to. They were hustled off to a "free speech zone" 3 blocks away, and held their protest there. Some people complained that it was a violation of free speech. I differ with that. Not all speech is free. Freedom of speech is one of the parts of the Constitution that is riddled with exceptions >> slander, libel, perjury, sedition, obscenity laws, child pornography, threats, fighting words, inciting a riot, etc.

In the case of the anti-Trump protesters, they have more than shown their hand enough for there to be preventive measures taken. There should be no anti-Trump protesting in the vicinity of the building (including parking lots) where Trump is scheduled to appear. Simple as that. Anyone protesting with the perimeter area should be subject to arrest.

I'm wondering if the leniency of the police we're seeing in some of these cities (Chicago, Costa Mesa, Burlingame, etc) are a result of deliberate semi-stand down policies of liberal mayors. Maybe we need a national ruling on this. Well, if we have to go to Obama for that, I guess we can forget that idea.

Might be interesting to research if there already are laws of that sort in California, Indiana, and other states.

hahahahahahahaha!

so it was okay when your idol told his loons to rough up protestors?

but now you're crying?

the protesters here were wrong. but i can't say you idiots didn't bring it on yourselves.
 
The protests against Donald Trump of the last 2 days have shown a lack of preparedness on the part of police regarding crowd control. No protester should ever be able to smash the windows of a police car. They should not be able to throw eggs or anything else at police or anyone else. They should not be allowed to get close enough to attack Donald Trump (or any candidate) , to his supporters.

When George Bush came to Tampa a few years ago, protesters weren't able to get with 3 blocks of the building Bush was driven to. They were hustled off to a "free speech zone" 3 blocks away, and held their protest there. Some people complained that it was a violation of free speech. I differ with that. Not all speech is free. Freedom of speech is one of the parts of the Constitution that is riddled with exceptions >> slander, libel, perjury, sedition, obscenity laws, child pornography, threats, fighting words, inciting a riot, etc.

In the case of the anti-Trump protesters, they have more than shown their hand enough for there to be preventive measures taken. There should be no anti-Trump protesting in the vicinity of the building (including parking lots) where Trump is scheduled to appear. Simple as that. Anyone protesting with the perimeter area should be subject to arrest.

I'm wondering if the leniency of the police we're seeing in some of these cities (Chicago, Costa Mesa, Burlingame, etc) are a result of deliberate semi-stand down policies of liberal mayors. Maybe we need a national ruling on this. Well, if we have to go to Obama for that, I guess we can forget that idea.

Might be interesting to research if there already are laws of that sort in California, Indiana, and other states.

hahahahahahahaha!

so it was okay when your idol told his loons to rough up protestors?

but now you're crying?

the protesters here were wrong. but i can't say you idiots didn't bring it on yourselves.
Ah, someone once said something, so now its cool if your side goes around attacking people, throwing rocks and vandalizing everything in sight. Nice try, but your logic is fucking retarded.
 
The protests against Donald Trump of the last 2 days have shown a lack of preparedness on the part of police regarding crowd control. No protester should ever be able to smash the windows of a police car. They should not be able to throw eggs or anything else at police or anyone else. They should not be allowed to get close enough to attack Donald Trump (or any candidate) , to his supporters.

When George Bush came to Tampa a few years ago, protesters weren't able to get with 3 blocks of the building Bush was driven to. They were hustled off to a "free speech zone" 3 blocks away, and held their protest there. Some people complained that it was a violation of free speech. I differ with that. Not all speech is free. Freedom of speech is one of the parts of the Constitution that is riddled with exceptions >> slander, libel, perjury, sedition, obscenity laws, child pornography, threats, fighting words, inciting a riot, etc.

In the case of the anti-Trump protesters, they have more than shown their hand enough for there to be preventive measures taken. There should be no anti-Trump protesting in the vicinity of the building (including parking lots) where Trump is scheduled to appear. Simple as that. Anyone protesting with the perimeter area should be subject to arrest.

I'm wondering if the leniency of the police we're seeing in some of these cities (Chicago, Costa Mesa, Burlingame, etc) are a result of deliberate semi-stand down policies of liberal mayors. Maybe we need a national ruling on this. Well, if we have to go to Obama for that, I guess we can forget that idea.

Might be interesting to research if there already are laws of that sort in California, Indiana, and other states.

hahahahahahahaha!

so it was okay when your idol told his loons to rough up protestors?

but now you're crying?

the protesters here were wrong. but i can't say you idiots didn't bring it on yourselves.
Ah, someone once said something, so now its cool if your side goes around attacking people, throwing rocks and vandalizing everything in sight. Nice try, but your logic is fucking retarded.

your post looks like something an insane person babbles....

oh wait.

the nutter who calls himself "godboy" really shouldn't comment on anyone else's logic.

:cuckoo:
 

Forum List

Back
Top