Kavanaugh Is An Extremist

We live in a democracy, that you oppose democracy one must wonder why you remain in the United States (assuming you do, since you are apparently embarrassed to let the reader know where you live).

Nope.

We live in constitutional republic.

LOL, sure we do, but to leave out democracy, it is easy to move to the repeal of Amendments (15, 17, 19,23, 24, 26) when one party control alls three branches of government.

We are a nation of laws, and the ability to suppress voting is already a policy unwritten but in effect today by the GOP.

Compulsory voting, IMO, required of every citizen 18 and older, in the United States should be considered.
 
Overturning Roe v. Wade is not the most efficient means to reduce the murders of the unborn in America. The most efficient means to reduce abortions is education about, and access to, birth control.

Nearly half of all abortions are the result of NO birth control being used by the mother. Another fifth are due to the improper or inconsistent use of birth control.

Contrary to what liberals would have us believe, everyone has access to birth control. The trick is getting people to USE it.

I mostly agree, however Democrats / liberals and progressives support contraceptives; Planned Parenthood; provides comprehensive education on health, sexuality and the use of Contraceptives to prevent an unwanted pregnancy and STD's.

Sadly, the Right Wing, and that includes the current Republican Party, seek to control human sexuality and have attacked Planned Parenthood as an abortions mill; put up roadblocks to install age related human sexuality in a comprehensive health care curriculum in the public schools, and closed clinics in RED STATES reducing abortion services to women and especially women who can't afford to travel, have no safety net, and no assistance from the sperm donor (jerks don't get to be called a father).
 
Last edited:
Overturning Roe v. Wade is not the most efficient means to reduce the murders of the unborn in America. The most efficient means to reduce abortions is education about, and access to, birth control.

Nearly half of all abortions are the result of NO birth control being used by the mother. Another fifth are due to the improper or inconsistent use of birth control.

Contrary to what liberals would have us believe, everyone has access to birth control. The trick is getting people to USE it.

I mostly agree, however Democrats & liberals and progressives support contraceptives provided by Planned Parenthood, which also proides comprehensive education on health and the use of Contraceptives to prevent an unwanted pregnancy and STD's.
Planned Parenthood also performs abortions.

The Right needs to supplant Planned Parenthood by simply opening women's health clinics which provide all the same services sans abortion.
 
Two take away's from Kavanaugh's statements:

  • He called our form of government a Constitutional Republic, a code word for those who disdain democracy;
  • He called contraceptives a form of abortion, again a code dear to the hearts of social conservatives.

Is this for real? Does it really require explanation for you?

We are not a Democracy. That's rule of the MAJORITY. That's a TRULY unstable type of government. We ARE a REPRESENTATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC. Where the rule of law prevents the majority from tyrannous acts. And it's the far left of your tribe that DISDAIN the Constitution and Rule of Law, because they sense themselves more qualified to BOSS other folks around and FORCE them to comply to their views and restrictions.

As far contraceptives, this becomes a basic science discussion. Contraceptives either PREVENT conception ENTIRELY (condoms) or they prevent fetal development. Certainly PlanB is a contraceptive that was developed to abort conception (the definition of a CONTRA-ceptive) after conception.

Those are STILL ISSUES. But they are also TRUE statements. So argue the ISSUES -- NOT the definitions.
Don't toy with a person who is heavily armed for debate like Cavanaugh about basic definitions. You will lose. You need to argue with him about the CHOICES of what he supports and doesn't.
 
We live in a democracy, that you oppose democracy one must wonder why you remain in the United States (assuming you do, since you are apparently embarrassed to let the reader know where you live).

Nope.

We live in constitutional republic.
Actually it is both

Actually it's not.

In a nutshell.

In a republic, a constitution or charter of rights protects certain inalienable rights that cannot be taken away by the government, even if it has been elected by a majority of voters. In a democracy, the majority is not restrained in this way and can impose its will on the minority.

What you want is a democracy, but you cant simply get it, because of the constitutional republic.
And that is why we have a constitutional republic.

To prevent the tyranny of the majority. Because since time began, city dwellers are more numerous, and more easily led, than the rest...and a huge number of city dwelling populations consist of the slaves (welfare dependents, SSI dependents, government employees) of whoever has the money.

They're a rigidly controlled voting bloc and that is the antithesis of liberty, and the antithesis of what our country is.
 
Two take away's from Kavanaugh's statements:

  • He called our form of government a Constitutional Republic, a code word for those who disdain democracy;
  • He called contraceptives a form of abortion, again a code dear to the hearts of social conservatives.

Is this for real? Does it really require explanation for you?

We are not a Democracy. That's rule of the MAJORITY. That's a TRULY unstable type of government. We ARE a REPRESENTATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC. Where the rule of law prevents the majority from tyrannous acts. And it's the far left of your tribe that DISDAIN the Constitution and Rule of Law, because they sense themselves more qualified to BOSS other folks around and FORCE them to comply to their views and restrictions.

As far contraceptives, this becomes a basic science discussion. Contraceptives either PREVENT conception ENTIRELY (condoms) or they prevent fetal development. Certainly PlanB is a contraceptive that was developed to abort conception (the definition of a CONTRA-ceptive) after conception.

Those are STILL ISSUES. But they are also TRUE statements. So argue the ISSUES -- NOT the definitions.
Don't toy with a person who is heavily armed for debate like Cavanaugh about basic definitions. You will lose. You need to argue with him about the CHOICES of what he supports and doesn't.

Something that prevents fetal development isn't a contraceptive.

Because for it to prevent fetal development, conception has to take place.
 
Kavanaugh explained the case this way: "That was a group that was being forced to provide a certain kind of coverage over their religious objection to their employees. And under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the question was first was this a substantial burden on the religious exercise."

"It seemed to me quite clearly it was. It was a technical matter of filling out a form. In that case they said filling out the form would make them complicit in the provision of the abortion-inducing drugs that they were, as a religious matter, objecting to."

That phrase, "abortion-inducing drugs," is one the right-wing glommed onto to intentionally confuse contraception with other drugs.

The man thinks that the pill is an abortion inducing drug.

If he's against birth control you know you can kiss Roe V Wade goodbye.

He's trying to pretend otherwise but the e-mails that the Dems released (over the objection if the GOP creeps) showed he clearly thinks he can and should overturn it
True.

Unfortunately, even if Kavanaugh fails to be confirmed, the Heritage Foundation and other rightwing entities will find another reactionary extremist hostile to settled, accepted precedent and the rule of law.
Birth control and/or various drugs related to family planning/non-planning are not a right. You are a moron.

Actually medication is a right as regulated by law. Although it's your right to choose to take them or not, you are not ENTITLED to having someone give or provide them to you at no cost -- unless you qualify for medical financial assistance. Maybe it was entitlement that you were after?

And personally, in the case of abortion, the Federal role should be extremely minimized in the subsidies.
 
Use complete sentences. I have no idea what you're asking.
Of course you don't. We were talking about the Bible. So when the Bible talks about the breath of life, what does it mean?
I know what we were talking about. Are you saying the unborn are dead or don't exist prior to their first breath of air?

Ask God, it is his Bible.

Sounds like he is saying life begins when you take that first breath?
Have they been charged? Can’t be convicted if you aren’t charged. Lol! I appreciate your butt hurt.
b I certainly appreciate how you assholes piss on the fucking Constitution if you think it helps Republicans.
Explain please. Be specific as to who is pissing on the Constitution, how they are doing it...and link it.

Republicans. They do it all the time. For example, ignoring Obama's nominee for the Supreme Court.

Where is that in the Constitution? It’s called politics, it’s dirty politics however there is nothing unconstitutional about it However it could bite them in the future.

The part where it describes how justices get on the court.

Show us where, specifically the Constitution was violated. So far you are all huff and puff and nothing else.
 
Unfortunately, even if Kavanaugh fails to be confirmed, the Heritage Foundation and other rightwing entities will find another reactionary extremist hostile to settled, accepted precedent and the rule of law.

They'd be hard pressed to find one this partisan or this outside the mainstream.

They certainly won't find one that thinks that President's are above the law

So far you have failed to prove Kavanaugh as an extremist but keep trying.
 
LOL, sure we do, but to leave out democracy, it is easy to move to the repeal of Amendments (15, 17, 19,23, 24, 26) when one party control alls three branches of government.

Great example of projecting your "inner leftist". Because we all know how badly the Obamas, Clintons, Kamala Harris's and others want to attack and repeal and roll back that "Living Document" ... It's all hypocrisy.

Both sides have wet dreams about Constitutional reform, but it's not gonna happen in the existing Amendments. It's gonna be NEW amendments clarifying the existing document as a whole.
 
Overturning Roe v. Wade is not the most efficient means to reduce the murders of the unborn in America. The most efficient means to reduce abortions is education about, and access to, birth control.

Nearly half of all abortions are the result of NO birth control being used by the mother. Another fifth are due to the improper or inconsistent use of birth control.

Contrary to what liberals would have us believe, everyone has access to birth control. The trick is getting people to USE it.

I mostly agree, however Democrats / liberals and progressives support contraceptives; Planned Parenthood; provides comprehensive education on health, sexuality and the use of Contraceptives to prevent an unwanted pregnancy and STD's.

Sadly, the Right Wing, and that includes the current Republican Party, seek to control human sexuality and have attacked Planned Parenthood as an abortions mill; put up roadblocks to install age related human sexuality in a comprehensive health care curriculum in the public schools, and closed clinics in RED STATES reducing abortion services to women and especially women who can't afford to travel, have no safety net, and no assistance from the sperm donor (jerks don't get to be called a father).

What utter horseshit. You don't have to have federally subsidized abortions to have sex. You just need abortions if you want to turn a profit as a sex trafficker.

THAT is what is behind Planned Parenthood and the Democratic Party, and the right is trying to get rid of it. The left are the human/sex/child sex trafficking party, and that is ALL that they are. That is ALL that PP is about. Making money off of abused women and children in order to funnel money back into the party that support the people who abuse and traffic them.

And, as always, the only people trying to federalize sexuality are the LEFTIST SCUMBAGS who demand we look on and coo approvingly when they fuck in the streets and in our schools.
 
Other readers who are curious and wonder about the nomination process on going need to read this LInk:

https://splinternews.com/brett-kavanaugh-appears-to-have-lied-repeatedly-under-o-1828912220

You just accused folks of being retarded for not feasting on the junk MSM? And you're taking a deep dive into "SplinterNews.com" ?? LOL..

The need to impeach Kavanaugh will drive you to the darkest alleyways in the bad parts of town at 2AM.. It's amazing how rabid and vicious this all is.
 
According to snowflakes, our Founding Fathers were 'Extremists'...

....................... and they would be correct.

No, they wouldn't.
You fail to grasp the fact that whether or not someone is *extremist* has nothing to do with their ideology. It has to do with how many people embrace the ideology.

Americans embraced it.

Yeah you're right if you add the qualifier that's its relative to THEIR CONTEMPORARIES. And not many of those folks embraced the ideology of going to war with England and inventing an UNKNOWN FORM of governance.
 
The DemonRATS now bring out the BIG GUNS, and ask the REALLY BIG Question....

[
PFoKUwj.jpg
 
According to snowflakes, our Founding Fathers were 'Extremists'...

....................... and they would be correct.

No, they wouldn't.
You fail to grasp the fact that whether or not someone is *extremist* has nothing to do with their ideology. It has to do with how many people embrace the ideology.

Americans embraced it.

Yeah you're right if you add the qualifier that's its relative to THEIR CONTEMPORARIES. And not many of those folks embraced the ideology of going to war with England and inventing an UNKNOWN FORM of governance.
Pretty much every ideology is *extremist* if you remove it from the time and place it typically occurs in.

It's just another word that the left bastardized and thus neutered by using it incorrectly and too often. Along with *racist*.
 
"the court must say we are all one race in the eyes of government" - Kavanaugh in 1999
 
According to snowflakes, our Founding Fathers were 'Extremists'...

....................... and they would be correct.
Yes, guaranteeing American citizens the right to peacefully assemble, the right of free speech, the right to defend themselves, the right to NOT have their religion be controlled by government, the right to due process...all those are so 'radical' to snowflakes, who want to control other people's lives and make decisions for them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top