Kavanaugh/Ford Opinion Threads -- Monday Sept 24th 2018

[Asclepias]

Can you not even see another side to this? Are you serious? Okay, I'll spell it out. First, the Dems are absolutely driving Republicans straight to the polls with this in November. Read up on that. Second, you are opening up a Pandora's box now for EVERY candidate. You think we won't turn this game on you? You think you can FIND a Dem candidate who didn't, in high school, have drunken shenanigans? If our Congressmen won't find those shenanigans, believe me, our media WILL.Stupid, stupid, short-sighted Dems. As. Ever.

`
The way I'm seeing now, trump and the republicans are driving the democrats to the polls. It's all the same to me as I neither like nor trust either party. I might have voted for Sanders and Warren but they both supported Hillary, who I still can't stand. I voted Green but with Jill Stein hobnobbing with Putin, I will not support her either. Sad state of affairs.

Democrats have zero legislative successes and an abundance of broken promises... what inspires you to support them, just wondering..?

Hey now....Obamacare worked out beautifully!!! //////

True. I know a lot of people that now have insurance because of it.

 

[OKTexas]

Poor pathetic misguided commie MF, it only took 15 posts for you to deflect from your own thread, REPORTED FOR OFF TOPIC POST.

.

well, actually, BIG TEX, when you bloviated this BS: "So the sleazy porn lawyer is injecting himself again, he's going deeper in debt every day, maybe he should find some paying clients. That 10 million in debt won't pay itself." that was a bit off topic but if you really wanna go crying to the police, then go ahead; call 9/11.

The topic is the sleazy porn lawyer and his fables, is it not?

.

Actually no; the topic is more info coming on another Kavanaugh accuser.

Avanetti just happens to be the messenger.

Avanetti is a pig, he hasn't asked for the committee to make room for another witness. He's just trying to muddy the waters. That slime ball ambulance chaser doesn't deserve to breath.

.

I wish I could say he's just the equivalent of a FNC conservative hack, but Avanetti is a lot smarter and backs up his bluster with facts, the truth, and results! Trump has attacked everyone else but this guys who goes right at him! MA's detractors can't say that since they were also sure Trump would be exonerated by now in the Mueller investigations/probes!

Yeah, that's what the slip and fall lawyer claims, I have yet to see him get any results for his clients. Stormy is still getting naked in small town strip clubs.

.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Kavanaugh will not be confirmed, that leaves Trump to nominate another justice, he can nominate a person who is more conservative and less desirable then Kavanaugh, the Senate then will not confirm. Then it puts the pressure on the Democrats to pass the third nominee because by that time the American public will be tired of the games. So, Trump and the Republicans can then force the issue.

You consider the Democrats playing a game? How do you consider McConnell's failure to bring Obama's nominee up for the advice and consent to replace Scalia?

McConnell used the forthcoming election for misfeasance, and did not apply the same standard in this election year.

McConnell Wife is employed by Trump in his Administration, Quid Pro Quo seems to be afoot.

Had Hillary Clinton won in November 2016, Garland would have been confirmed by the end of the month I'm sure.


In any event, Garland never had his character assassinated, his family is still together as well as his career.

This ^^^ is off topic and entirely feasible. HRC has had her character assassinated for decades, ever since she was first lady. Seems Kavanaugh and his supporters are fearful that the truth may harm him and curtail his appointment.

Too F'n bad for him, the "lock her up" crowd continued this chant even after she had been investigated and never found culpable eight times.

The GOP and its fellow travelers are in a word, EVIL. If one characterizes their machinations as beyond the pale of normal politics; which it is! Their goal is one party leadership, such as that in Russia and China and N. Korea and Iran.

Why you fellow travelers can't see this is perplexing.

 

[Asclepias]

He will get confirmed, as the same people who voted for Trump while holding their noses, will want Kavanaugh while holding their noses.

I don't know what to think about the guy, really, but a big part of me is reluctant to judge a man like Kavanaugh on drunken behavior when he was 16, 17, 18 years old. As an ADULT, his career and reputation is sterling, and he has an impressive legal mind. Apparently he quit drinking or he grew up (not surprising--that happens to most of us), or both. Would I be devastated to learn that my son had done something like what Kavanaugh is accused of when he was that age? Of course, but I know that he is now an outstanding father and husband, a good man and a positive contributor to the community. Should all that go down the tubes because of drunken behavior when he was not yet fully formed? I truly wonder, Penelope.

A man who thinks the Potus is above the law, is said to have voted pro in favor of corps over individuals, and would not let an immigrant get an abortion after she was supposedly raped, yes I think so. We have 9 people on the SC and its a lifetime position, and there are others who can fill the void, he was not on the first list, but was picked due to the fact he thought the Potus should not even be investigated.

Now THAT is a good reason to oppose his nomination. If only that is the discussion this country was having right now, instead of talking about ... you know.

You idiots haven't presented one valid reason to oppose Kavanaugh other than TRUMP APPOINTED HIM!!!!!

Stop the ******* charade. This is past ridiculous

How about the fact he is probably a sexual predator and functioning alcoholic?

 

[AntonToo]

Ms. Ford has relief even if the police don't investigate.

Judge Kavanaugh with his denials has made it clear that Ford is lying. She can sue him for defamation, and should, really. She'll be able to get satisfaction

Lol, no dummy, Judge Kavanaugh dug himself into a hole with his not-credible denials.

It is not-credible when Kavanaugh says that he doesn't remember a bunch of stuff (like if he perhaps did at one point meet the accuser), but that he is 100% certain he wasn't at a particular party 35 years ago. It doesn't add up.

It is not-credible when Ford is one pressing for FBI investigation and WH with Kavanaugh run away from it.

I am SOOO glad you are not a lawyer, investigator or a even a simple jurist, who keeps making a fool of himself in the process.

Here is something YOU need to understand, The ACCUSER is the one who has to prove it happened with evidence with the help of a local police prosecutor or Detective. The Accused only has to sit back to see what "evidence" are brought up against him before making a defense.

Dr. Ford has never made a statement under other OATH to the Senate Committee, neither has she asked a local police to investigate it, neither has she sued him over it.

She is running on NOTHING, even her own long time friend contradicted Ford by saying UNDER OATH she didn't know who Kavanaugh was and was never there as claimed by Ford.

Why don't you do some learning on what the RULE OF LAW is?

Burden of proof (law)

"The burden of proof (Latin: onus probandi) is the obligation of a party in a trial to produce the evidence that will prove the claims they have made against the other party. In a legal dispute, one party is initially presumed to be correct and gets the benefit of the doubt, while the other side bears the burden of proof. When a party bearing the burden of proof meets its burden, the burden of proof switches to the other side."

DR. Ford has yet to provide any burden of proof, Kavanaugh doesn't have to defend anything.

Dummy, this is not a court of law. Kavanaugh is not in legal jeopardy. This is a court of public opinion and Congress that can confirm or deny him for just about any reason at all.

And you will continue to troll and lie your ass off, Kavanaugh has been demanding a hearing for two weeks now, that's all he has the power to do.

.

You are a joke, Kavanaugh can demand WHATEVER THE **** HE WANTS TO DEMAND.

Niether a hearing (see Garland) nor FBI investigation are hinged on his demands, but when he dodges the question of FBI investigation that WH can initiate at ANYTIME, he is acting conspicuously.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Kavanaugh will not be confirmed, that leaves Trump to nominate another justice, he can nominate a person who is more conservative and less desirable then Kavanaugh, the Senate then will not confirm. Then it puts the pressure on the Democrats to pass the third nominee because by that time the American public will be tired of the games. So, Trump and the Republicans can then force the issue.

You consider the Democrats playing a game? How do you consider McConnell's failure to bring Obama's nominee up for the advice and consent to replace Scalia?

McConnell used the forthcoming election for misfeasance, and did not apply the same standard in this election year.

McConnell Wife is employed by Trump in his Administration, Quid Pro Quo seems to be afoot.

That is the way most Americans see politics, it is a game and it really is just that, a game to gain power. That is what makes politics intriguing, it is nothing but a game to gain power and prestige.

Cynics see it your way, those of us who have worked with elected officials and their staff know differently. Of course there are some who seek power for the sake of it, but others really do give a damn.

There is systemic problem which of late has become more and more toxic. Can you even guess what that may be?

 

[Asclepias]

Hmmmm....all these women are leftist.
But I'm sure thats just a coincidence.

Getting raped and sexually assaulted by white male conservatives probably has something to do with that.

 

[OKTexas]

Ms. Ford has relief even if the police don't investigate.

Judge Kavanaugh with his denials has made it clear that Ford is lying. She can sue him for defamation, and should, really. She'll be able to get satisfaction

Lol, no dummy, Judge Kavanaugh dug himself into a hole with his not-credible denials.

It is not-credible when Kavanaugh says that he doesn't remember a bunch of stuff (like if he perhaps did at one point meet the accuser), but that he is 100% certain he wasn't at a particular party 35 years ago. It doesn't add up.

It is not-credible when Ford is one pressing for FBI investigation and WH with Kavanaugh run away from it.

I am SOOO glad you are not a lawyer, investigator or a even a simple jurist, who keeps making a fool of himself in the process.

Here is something YOU need to understand, The ACCUSER is the one who has to prove it happened with evidence with the help of a local police prosecutor or Detective. The Accused only has to sit back to see what "evidence" are brought up against him before making a defense.

Dr. Ford has never made a statement under other OATH to the Senate Committee, neither has she asked a local police to investigate it, neither has she sued him over it.

She is running on NOTHING, even her own long time friend contradicted Ford by saying UNDER OATH she didn't know who Kavanaugh was and was never there as claimed by Ford.

Why don't you do some learning on what the RULE OF LAW is?

Burden of proof (law)

"The burden of proof (Latin: onus probandi) is the obligation of a party in a trial to produce the evidence that will prove the claims they have made against the other party. In a legal dispute, one party is initially presumed to be correct and gets the benefit of the doubt, while the other side bears the burden of proof. When a party bearing the burden of proof meets its burden, the burden of proof switches to the other side."

DR. Ford has yet to provide any burden of proof, Kavanaugh doesn't have to defend anything.

Dummy, this is not a court of law. Kavanaugh is not in legal jeopardy. This is a court of public opinion and Congress that can confirm or deny him for just about any reason at all.

And you will continue to troll and lie your ass off, Kavanaugh has been demanding a hearing for two weeks now, that's all he has the power to do.

.

You are a joke, Kavanaugh can demand WHATEVER THE **** HE WANTS TO DEMAND.

Niether a hearing (see Garland) nor FBI investigation are hinged on his demands, but when he dodges the question of FBI investigation that WH can initiate at ANYTIME, he is acting conspicuously.

Exactly what the **** do you want the FBI to investigate, they already have statements form every one of Fords proclaimed witnesses that they have no memory of ever being at a party Ford describes. Ford can't tell them exactly where or when this supposed party took place, so exactly where is the FBI supposed to start?

Now you can proceed to do your little dance and deflection without answering my question.

.

 

[Asclepias]

`

Brett Kavanaugh's prospects of being confirmed to the Supreme Court suffered another major setback on Sunday night when a second woman accused him of sexual assault decades ago, and a prominent lawyer took to Twitter claiming a third woman has "credible information" on the high court nominee.

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee are investigating another allegation of sexual assault against Kavanaugh, according to The New Yorker. Deborah Ramirez, who is 53, told the magazine that when Kavanaugh was a freshman at Yale in the 1983-84 academic school year, she remembers that he “exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away.”

Kavanaugh flatly denied the allegation, calling it a last-minute smear. But his confirmation now appears to be in serious doubt. Most Senate Republicans had vowed to push forward with his nomination after securing a Thursday hearing with Christine Blasey Ford, who went public a week ago with her allegation that Kavanaugh sexually attacked her at a high school party.- Source​

`
`
When it rains, it pours. Poor Brett can't seem to get a break here.
`

Looks like they won't be able to ignore an FBI investigation now.

You underestimate the stupidity of the repubs.

 

[AntonToo]

Lol, no dummy, Judge Kavanaugh dug himself into a hole with his not-credible denials.

It is not-credible when Kavanaugh says that he doesn't remember a bunch of stuff (like if he perhaps did at one point meet the accuser), but that he is 100% certain he wasn't at a particular party 35 years ago. It doesn't add up.

It is not-credible when Ford is one pressing for FBI investigation and WH with Kavanaugh run away from it.

I am SOOO glad you are not a lawyer, investigator or a even a simple jurist, who keeps making a fool of himself in the process.

Here is something YOU need to understand, The ACCUSER is the one who has to prove it happened with evidence with the help of a local police prosecutor or Detective. The Accused only has to sit back to see what "evidence" are brought up against him before making a defense.

Dr. Ford has never made a statement under other OATH to the Senate Committee, neither has she asked a local police to investigate it, neither has she sued him over it.

She is running on NOTHING, even her own long time friend contradicted Ford by saying UNDER OATH she didn't know who Kavanaugh was and was never there as claimed by Ford.

Why don't you do some learning on what the RULE OF LAW is?

Burden of proof (law)

"The burden of proof (Latin: onus probandi) is the obligation of a party in a trial to produce the evidence that will prove the claims they have made against the other party. In a legal dispute, one party is initially presumed to be correct and gets the benefit of the doubt, while the other side bears the burden of proof. When a party bearing the burden of proof meets its burden, the burden of proof switches to the other side."

DR. Ford has yet to provide any burden of proof, Kavanaugh doesn't have to defend anything.

Dummy, this is not a court of law. Kavanaugh is not in legal jeopardy. This is a court of public opinion and Congress that can confirm or deny him for just about any reason at all.

And you will continue to troll and lie your ass off, Kavanaugh has been demanding a hearing for two weeks now, that's all he has the power to do.

.

You are a joke, Kavanaugh can demand WHATEVER THE **** HE WANTS TO DEMAND.

Niether a hearing (see Garland) nor FBI investigation are hinged on his demands, but when he dodges the question of FBI investigation that WH can initiate at ANYTIME, he is acting conspicuously.

Exactly what the **** do you want the FBI to investigate, they already have statements form every one of Fords proclaimed witnesses that they have no memory of ever being at a party Ford describes. Ford can't tell them exactly where or when this supposed party took place, so exactly where is the FBI supposed to start?

Now you can proceed to do your little dance and deflection without answering my question.

.

It's amazing how much better memory starts to work when FBI is interviewing you and a bunch of people that were in the same room as you.

 

[OKTexas]

I am SOOO glad you are not a lawyer, investigator or a even a simple jurist, who keeps making a fool of himself in the process.

Here is something YOU need to understand, The ACCUSER is the one who has to prove it happened with evidence with the help of a local police prosecutor or Detective. The Accused only has to sit back to see what "evidence" are brought up against him before making a defense.

Dr. Ford has never made a statement under other OATH to the Senate Committee, neither has she asked a local police to investigate it, neither has she sued him over it.

She is running on NOTHING, even her own long time friend contradicted Ford by saying UNDER OATH she didn't know who Kavanaugh was and was never there as claimed by Ford.

Why don't you do some learning on what the RULE OF LAW is?

Burden of proof (law)

"The burden of proof (Latin: onus probandi) is the obligation of a party in a trial to produce the evidence that will prove the claims they have made against the other party. In a legal dispute, one party is initially presumed to be correct and gets the benefit of the doubt, while the other side bears the burden of proof. When a party bearing the burden of proof meets its burden, the burden of proof switches to the other side."

DR. Ford has yet to provide any burden of proof, Kavanaugh doesn't have to defend anything.

Dummy, this is not a court of law. Kavanaugh is not in legal jeopardy. This is a court of public opinion and Congress that can confirm or deny him for just about any reason at all.

And you will continue to troll and lie your ass off, Kavanaugh has been demanding a hearing for two weeks now, that's all he has the power to do.

.

You are a joke, Kavanaugh can demand WHATEVER THE **** HE WANTS TO DEMAND.

Niether a hearing (see Garland) nor FBI investigation are hinged on his demands, but when he dodges the question of FBI investigation that WH can initiate at ANYTIME, he is acting conspicuously.

Exactly what the **** do you want the FBI to investigate, they already have statements form every one of Fords proclaimed witnesses that they have no memory of ever being at a party Ford describes. Ford can't tell them exactly where or when this supposed party took place, so exactly where is the FBI supposed to start?

Now you can proceed to do your little dance and deflection without answering my question.

.

It's amazing how much better memory starts to work when FBI is interviewing you and a bunch of people that were in the same room as you.

So you want the FBI to act as the commiecrat KGB. Figures.

.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Lol, no dummy, Judge Kavanaugh dug himself into a hole with his not-credible denials.

It is not-credible when Kavanaugh says that he doesn't remember a bunch of stuff (like if he perhaps did at one point meet the accuser), but that he is 100% certain he wasn't at a particular party 35 years ago. It doesn't add up.

It is not-credible when Ford is one pressing for FBI investigation and WH with Kavanaugh run away from it.

I am SOOO glad you are not a lawyer, investigator or a even a simple jurist, who keeps making a fool of himself in the process.

Here is something YOU need to understand, The ACCUSER is the one who has to prove it happened with evidence with the help of a local police prosecutor or Detective. The Accused only has to sit back to see what "evidence" are brought up against him before making a defense.

Dr. Ford has never made a statement under other OATH to the Senate Committee, neither has she asked a local police to investigate it, neither has she sued him over it.

She is running on NOTHING, even her own long time friend contradicted Ford by saying UNDER OATH she didn't know who Kavanaugh was and was never there as claimed by Ford.

Why don't you do some learning on what the RULE OF LAW is?

Burden of proof (law)

"The burden of proof (Latin: onus probandi) is the obligation of a party in a trial to produce the evidence that will prove the claims they have made against the other party. In a legal dispute, one party is initially presumed to be correct and gets the benefit of the doubt, while the other side bears the burden of proof. When a party bearing the burden of proof meets its burden, the burden of proof switches to the other side."

DR. Ford has yet to provide any burden of proof, Kavanaugh doesn't have to defend anything.

Dummy, this is not a court of law. Kavanaugh is not in legal jeopardy. This is a court of public opinion and Congress that can confirm or deny him for just about any reason at all.

And you will continue to troll and lie your ass off, Kavanaugh has been demanding a hearing for two weeks now, that's all he has the power to do.

.

You are a joke, Kavanaugh can demand WHATEVER THE **** HE WANTS TO DEMAND.

Niether a hearing (see Garland) nor FBI investigation are hinged on his demands, but when he dodges the question of FBI investigation that WH can initiate at ANYTIME, he is acting conspicuously.

Exactly what the **** do you want the FBI to investigate, they already have statements form every one of Fords proclaimed witnesses that they have no memory of ever being at a party Ford describes. Ford can't tell them exactly where or when this supposed party took place, so exactly where is the FBI supposed to start?

Now you can proceed to do your little dance and deflection without answering my question.

.

I answered your question as to what the FBI can do before; in short interview the actors and any witnesses. Then go back and interview them again after preparing the notes taken the first time as well as the recordings.

Little lies lead to big lies and big lies lead to more evidence and more witnesses and documents; thus eventually a conclusion.

This is what scares the crap out of Grassley and the other Republican members of the committee, and you.

 

[OKTexas]

I am SOOO glad you are not a lawyer, investigator or a even a simple jurist, who keeps making a fool of himself in the process.

Here is something YOU need to understand, The ACCUSER is the one who has to prove it happened with evidence with the help of a local police prosecutor or Detective. The Accused only has to sit back to see what "evidence" are brought up against him before making a defense.

Dr. Ford has never made a statement under other OATH to the Senate Committee, neither has she asked a local police to investigate it, neither has she sued him over it.

She is running on NOTHING, even her own long time friend contradicted Ford by saying UNDER OATH she didn't know who Kavanaugh was and was never there as claimed by Ford.

Why don't you do some learning on what the RULE OF LAW is?

Burden of proof (law)

"The burden of proof (Latin: onus probandi) is the obligation of a party in a trial to produce the evidence that will prove the claims they have made against the other party. In a legal dispute, one party is initially presumed to be correct and gets the benefit of the doubt, while the other side bears the burden of proof. When a party bearing the burden of proof meets its burden, the burden of proof switches to the other side."

DR. Ford has yet to provide any burden of proof, Kavanaugh doesn't have to defend anything.

Dummy, this is not a court of law. Kavanaugh is not in legal jeopardy. This is a court of public opinion and Congress that can confirm or deny him for just about any reason at all.

And you will continue to troll and lie your ass off, Kavanaugh has been demanding a hearing for two weeks now, that's all he has the power to do.

.

You are a joke, Kavanaugh can demand WHATEVER THE **** HE WANTS TO DEMAND.

Niether a hearing (see Garland) nor FBI investigation are hinged on his demands, but when he dodges the question of FBI investigation that WH can initiate at ANYTIME, he is acting conspicuously.

Exactly what the **** do you want the FBI to investigate, they already have statements form every one of Fords proclaimed witnesses that they have no memory of ever being at a party Ford describes. Ford can't tell them exactly where or when this supposed party took place, so exactly where is the FBI supposed to start?

Now you can proceed to do your little dance and deflection without answering my question.

.

I answered your question as to what the FBI can do before; in short interview the actors and any witnesses. Then go back and interview them again after preparing the notes taken the first time as well as the recordings.

Little lies lead to big lies and big lies lead to more evidence and more witnesses and documents; thus eventually a conclusion.

This is what scares the crap out of Grassley and the other Republican members of the committee, and you.

You are aware that it's not common practice for the FBI to record interviews. They already have statements, now you what to send them out fishing. Another investigation in search of a crime, something you folks seem to love. Fords witnesses haven't corroborated her fantasy, in fact they have debunked it. I don't see her as a credible witness either, wholes you can drive an aircraft carrier though. She best hope she can blend into the woodwork when this is over.

.

 

[AntonToo]

Dummy, this is not a court of law. Kavanaugh is not in legal jeopardy. This is a court of public opinion and Congress that can confirm or deny him for just about any reason at all.

And you will continue to troll and lie your ass off, Kavanaugh has been demanding a hearing for two weeks now, that's all he has the power to do.

.

You are a joke, Kavanaugh can demand WHATEVER THE **** HE WANTS TO DEMAND.

Niether a hearing (see Garland) nor FBI investigation are hinged on his demands, but when he dodges the question of FBI investigation that WH can initiate at ANYTIME, he is acting conspicuously.

Exactly what the **** do you want the FBI to investigate, they already have statements form every one of Fords proclaimed witnesses that they have no memory of ever being at a party Ford describes. Ford can't tell them exactly where or when this supposed party took place, so exactly where is the FBI supposed to start?

Now you can proceed to do your little dance and deflection without answering my question.

.

I answered your question as to what the FBI can do before; in short interview the actors and any witnesses. Then go back and interview them again after preparing the notes taken the first time as well as the recordings.

Little lies lead to big lies and big lies lead to more evidence and more witnesses and documents; thus eventually a conclusion.

This is what scares the crap out of Grassley and the other Republican members of the committee, and you.

You are aware that it's not common practice for the FBI to record interviews. They already have statements, now you what to send them out fishing. Another investigation in search of a crime, something you folks seem to love. Fords witnesses haven't corroborated her fantasy, in fact they have debunked it. I don't see her as a credible witness either, wholes you can drive an aircraft carrier though. She best hope she can blend into the woodwork when this is over.

.

Can you stop lying already???

FBI does not "have statements" worth a damn. They are statements to media, with ZERO liability.

FBI conducted such investigations before. It was done promptly and helped move the process along. There is no reason this coud not be done in this instance and it just makes Kavanaugh look bad when his accuser is asking for one and he is playing dodge.

 

[Redfish]

...did I not just say that? Trump can yank Kavanaugh and replace him with any other of a dozen conservative judges.

Yeah Trump (probably Pence lol) showed the bag of conservative goodies to the evangelicals and they all had an orgasm.

oh please run Mooshelle in 2020, please please do it.

I think she's smart enough (and life is too short) to get on that shit-hole corrupted bandwagon. Time for a 40 year old with energy like Kennedy (or Obama) had.

right, we really need another president who hates the USA. WTF is wrong with you?

 

[Redfish]

And you will continue to troll and lie your ass off, Kavanaugh has been demanding a hearing for two weeks now, that's all he has the power to do.

.

You are a joke, Kavanaugh can demand WHATEVER THE **** HE WANTS TO DEMAND.

Niether a hearing (see Garland) nor FBI investigation are hinged on his demands, but when he dodges the question of FBI investigation that WH can initiate at ANYTIME, he is acting conspicuously.

Exactly what the **** do you want the FBI to investigate, they already have statements form every one of Fords proclaimed witnesses that they have no memory of ever being at a party Ford describes. Ford can't tell them exactly where or when this supposed party took place, so exactly where is the FBI supposed to start?

Now you can proceed to do your little dance and deflection without answering my question.

.

I answered your question as to what the FBI can do before; in short interview the actors and any witnesses. Then go back and interview them again after preparing the notes taken the first time as well as the recordings.

Little lies lead to big lies and big lies lead to more evidence and more witnesses and documents; thus eventually a conclusion.

This is what scares the crap out of Grassley and the other Republican members of the committee, and you.

You are aware that it's not common practice for the FBI to record interviews. They already have statements, now you what to send them out fishing. Another investigation in search of a crime, something you folks seem to love. Fords witnesses haven't corroborated her fantasy, in fact they have debunked it. I don't see her as a credible witness either, wholes you can drive an aircraft carrier though. She best hope she can blend into the woodwork when this is over.

.

Can you stop lying already???

FBI does not "have statements" worth a damn. They are statements to media, with ZERO liability.

FBI conducted such investigations before. It was done promptly and helped move the process along. There is no reason this coud not be done in this instance and it just makes Kavanaugh look bad when his accuser is asking for one and he is playing dodge.

OK, what would you tell the FBI to investigate? an alleged sexual attack that took place around 1985, but the accuser doesn't know where, exactly when, who was there, and there are no witnesses to substantiate her claim, it would be like asking the FBI to see if Lyndon Johnson screwed his secretary in the oval office. a waste of time, money, and effort.

 

[Redfish]

And you will continue to troll and lie your ass off, Kavanaugh has been demanding a hearing for two weeks now, that's all he has the power to do.

.

You are a joke, Kavanaugh can demand WHATEVER THE **** HE WANTS TO DEMAND.

Niether a hearing (see Garland) nor FBI investigation are hinged on his demands, but when he dodges the question of FBI investigation that WH can initiate at ANYTIME, he is acting conspicuously.

Exactly what the **** do you want the FBI to investigate, they already have statements form every one of Fords proclaimed witnesses that they have no memory of ever being at a party Ford describes. Ford can't tell them exactly where or when this supposed party took place, so exactly where is the FBI supposed to start?

Now you can proceed to do your little dance and deflection without answering my question.

.

I answered your question as to what the FBI can do before; in short interview the actors and any witnesses. Then go back and interview them again after preparing the notes taken the first time as well as the recordings.

Little lies lead to big lies and big lies lead to more evidence and more witnesses and documents; thus eventually a conclusion.

This is what scares the crap out of Grassley and the other Republican members of the committee, and you.

You are aware that it's not common practice for the FBI to record interviews. They already have statements, now you what to send them out fishing. Another investigation in search of a crime, something you folks seem to love. Fords witnesses haven't corroborated her fantasy, in fact they have debunked it. I don't see her as a credible witness either, wholes you can drive an aircraft carrier though. She best hope she can blend into the woodwork when this is over.

.

Can you stop lying already???

FBI does not "have statements" worth a damn. They are statements to media, with ZERO liability.

FBI conducted such investigations before. It was done promptly and helped move the process along. There is no reason this coud not be done in this instance and it just makes Kavanaugh look bad when his accuser is asking for one and he is playing dodge.

Kavanaugh has never said he is against an investigation, its the FBI who said that, and the Maryland AG. Prosecuters, federal, state, county, or city do not investigate unsupported allegations with zero evidence or collaboration.

 

[Wry Catcher]

You are a joke, Kavanaugh can demand WHATEVER THE **** HE WANTS TO DEMAND.

Niether a hearing (see Garland) nor FBI investigation are hinged on his demands, but when he dodges the question of FBI investigation that WH can initiate at ANYTIME, he is acting conspicuously.

Exactly what the **** do you want the FBI to investigate, they already have statements form every one of Fords proclaimed witnesses that they have no memory of ever being at a party Ford describes. Ford can't tell them exactly where or when this supposed party took place, so exactly where is the FBI supposed to start?

Now you can proceed to do your little dance and deflection without answering my question.

.

I answered your question as to what the FBI can do before; in short interview the actors and any witnesses. Then go back and interview them again after preparing the notes taken the first time as well as the recordings.

Little lies lead to big lies and big lies lead to more evidence and more witnesses and documents; thus eventually a conclusion.

This is what scares the crap out of Grassley and the other Republican members of the committee, and you.

You are aware that it's not common practice for the FBI to record interviews. They already have statements, now you what to send them out fishing. Another investigation in search of a crime, something you folks seem to love. Fords witnesses haven't corroborated her fantasy, in fact they have debunked it. I don't see her as a credible witness either, wholes you can drive an aircraft carrier though. She best hope she can blend into the woodwork when this is over.

.

Can you stop lying already???

FBI does not "have statements" worth a damn. They are statements to media, with ZERO liability.

FBI conducted such investigations before. It was done promptly and helped move the process along. There is no reason this coud not be done in this instance and it just makes Kavanaugh look bad when his accuser is asking for one and he is playing dodge.

OK, what would you tell the FBI to investigate? an alleged sexual attack that took place around 1985, but the accuser doesn't know where, exactly when, who was there, and there are no witnesses to substantiate her claim, it would be like asking the FBI to see if Lyndon Johnson screwed his secretary in the oval office. a waste of time, money, and effort.

I don't need to tell the FBI how to investigate, in fact they trained me.

 

[Wry Catcher]

You are a joke, Kavanaugh can demand WHATEVER THE **** HE WANTS TO DEMAND.

Niether a hearing (see Garland) nor FBI investigation are hinged on his demands, but when he dodges the question of FBI investigation that WH can initiate at ANYTIME, he is acting conspicuously.

Exactly what the **** do you want the FBI to investigate, they already have statements form every one of Fords proclaimed witnesses that they have no memory of ever being at a party Ford describes. Ford can't tell them exactly where or when this supposed party took place, so exactly where is the FBI supposed to start?

Now you can proceed to do your little dance and deflection without answering my question.

.

I answered your question as to what the FBI can do before; in short interview the actors and any witnesses. Then go back and interview them again after preparing the notes taken the first time as well as the recordings.

Little lies lead to big lies and big lies lead to more evidence and more witnesses and documents; thus eventually a conclusion.

This is what scares the crap out of Grassley and the other Republican members of the committee, and you.

You are aware that it's not common practice for the FBI to record interviews. They already have statements, now you what to send them out fishing. Another investigation in search of a crime, something you folks seem to love. Fords witnesses haven't corroborated her fantasy, in fact they have debunked it. I don't see her as a credible witness either, wholes you can drive an aircraft carrier though. She best hope she can blend into the woodwork when this is over.

.

Can you stop lying already???

FBI does not "have statements" worth a damn. They are statements to media, with ZERO liability.

FBI conducted such investigations before. It was done promptly and helped move the process along. There is no reason this coud not be done in this instance and it just makes Kavanaugh look bad when his accuser is asking for one and he is playing dodge.

Kavanaugh has never said he is against an investigation, its the FBI who said that, and the Maryland AG. Prosecuters, federal, state, county, or city do not investigate unsupported allegations with zero evidence or collaboration.

Huh, it begins with local police or sheriff agencies, unless they respond to a homicide or other serious violent felony, their inspectors or detectives do the initial investigation.

I don't know when the FBI enters into an investigation by policy, I know they will respond and take over in some circumstances, but never personally asked them to intervene. They do the background check for Federal nominees, and that includes Kavanaugh.

 

[captkaos]

The Democrats are playing a very dangerous game here. I don't think they realize the pushback they're inviting.

`
Dangerous game? Pushback? Pray tell, how?

Can you not even see another side to this? Are you serious?

Okay, I'll spell it out. First, the Dems are absolutely driving Republicans straight to the polls with this in November. Read up on that. Second, you are opening up a Pandora's box now for EVERY candidate. You think we won't turn this game on you? You think you can FIND a Dem candidate who didn't, in high school, have drunken shenanigans? If our Congressmen won't find those shenanigans, believe me, our media WILL.

Stupid, stupid, short-sighted Dems. As. Ever.

The Far left Media doesn't even want to look. I would be willing to bet If the American people took a good long look inside the Beltway we would discover that A large # of our elected officials have some very dirty laundry in their closets sexually and otherwise . Lets star a movement to uncover all the dirt we can true or not about every member of the senate and let them Prove it didn't happen. For instance Senator Blumenthal grabbed my junk at a democratic fundraiser for Obama in 2012 and then had me harassed into silence let him prove it didn't happen. I've been damaged deeply by his act of predation