Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The prosecution did present evidence of another crime, as solid as they could, plus Weisselberg notes on how to falsify the hush money repayment to Cohen.I believe that he would have testified if the prosecution had proved their case. Even if it seem like a Hail Mary, if the prosecution case was as strong as Democrats on here, claimed that it was, what would he have to lose?
Now, seeing that the prosecution has basically presented no evidence of any particular crime Trump testifying we just give them an opportunity to drag out all the things that were irrelevant to the trial such as stormy Daniels.
Trump was likely getting Alvin Bragg’s hopes up to crush them. Kind of cruel, but it couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.
This is a trial about Trump paying off Stormy.In any normal courtroom that might be the case but this is Judge Merchon's courtroom and HE decides what is relevant and what isn't. It's why Costello wasn't allowed to answer questions and Stormy Daniels could talk for hours about the sex act she supposedly had with Trump!
Because you don’t want to bet on a conviction. That’s all I need to know. You are not confidence there will be a conviction. That’s the point of the thread. You just proved it for me.Here is you all of two seconds ago:
You didn't propose any alternate terms, you simply declined.
Something Cohen said. In other words you believe a convicted liar and thiefI belive estblished facts and what they all add up to.
There is absolutely no sane explanation for these payments to Cohen from Trump and his company except for this NDA.
He said she said got something better? FYI it's not illegal to fuck a woman just ask Billie Clinton.This is a trial about Trump paying off Stormy.
He had sex with Stormy.
He didn't have sex with Costellow (I hope. too late, you already had the image in your mind!!!)
So, um, yeah, relevance.
Stormy was able to talk and talk because the Defense lawyers did not object....the defense let it happen, and one has to wonder WHY they did that....? The judge would have immediately SUSTAINED the objections....if they only would have objected earlier in the questioning of her......In any normal courtroom that might be the case but this is Judge Merchon's courtroom and HE decides what is relevant and what isn't. It's why Costello wasn't allowed to answer questions and Stormy Daniels could talk for hours about the sex act she supposedly had with Trump!
Not for lying for Trump. He was involved in a scam dealing with taxi cab medallions.He's in jail for perjury, for lying in court under oath, for Trump. This is his second sentence, and second time period served in prison for Trump, by Alan Weisselberg.
Trump has a severance agreement with Weisselberg, of which $800,000.000 is still not paid. The severance pay, basically requires him to not give law enforcement any information on Trump that could hurt Trump. He's served a prison sentence twice for Trump by perjuring himself in court, so imo, no one could believe him if he did testify.
And the third reason is that Weisselberg was also part of this crime of falsifying records, of which the court has evidence of his hand written notes showing how they were going to falsify their records to cover-up their reimbursement to Cohen for the Stormy Daniel $130,000 hush money he paid upfront for Trump, so Weisselberg's lawyers would insist that Weisselberg plead the 5th.
Because you don’t want to bet on a conviction.
Something Cohen said. In other words you believe a convicted liar and thief
I don't want either of you making this silly bet! You both are needed on the site!Because you don’t want to bet on a conviction. That’s all I need to know. You are not confidence there will be a conviction. That’s the point of the thread. You just proved it for me.
Anyway, I thought you said you stopped reading. So how do you know I didn’t offer alternate terms?
You want alternate terms? Here’s my alternate terms: you bet on a conviction and I’ll bet on an acquittal and a hung jury is a push.
Not going to wager over the “score.” That’s not how a criminal trial works. The prosecutor doesn’t get extra credit because 7 jurors voted guilty. Prosecutors aren’t even supposed to try cases if they think it’s going to be a hung jury.
Here’s my alternate terms: you bet on a conviction and I’ll bet on an acquittal and a hung jury is a push.
Aw!I don't want either of you making this silly bet! You both are needed on the site!
Done, sir!I really don't think 11-1 hung jury is a push case. But fine, I accept your bet.
35K a month for 12 months as repayment for a 130K NDA makes no sense at all. You have to be severely math challenged to accept that premise.
Neither of those notes is in Trump’s handwriting and no credible person has verified their authenticity.Trump's CFO wrote out the math and I explained it to you multiple times.
Lets go over it yet again:
Cohen submitted reciept on 130k NDA payment and claimed 50k expense on tech services = 180k
For him to pocket that 180K back, he needs to get paid 360k and pay half of that in taxes.
On top of 360k, it was agreed for Cohen to recieve a bonus of 60k for a grand total of 420k. To be paid out in 12 x 35k payments.
Yes.Any math questions remaining?
Neither of those notes is in Trump’s handwriting and no credible person has verified their authenticity.
Yes.
Who explained that math to Trump and when ?
It looks for all the world like a hastily created document designed to support the fanciful story that 420K worth of monthly retainer payments were actually secret reimbursements for a 130K NDA that was perfectly legal.
Is any part of those hand written notes, supposedly by Cohen and Weisselberg a lie?
I understand how absurd and nonsensical it is.I will repeat my question: DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE MATH?
I understand how absurd and nonsensical it is.
You posted supposed proof of that supposed reimbursement plan in the form of handwritten notes on a bank record.
Is any part of those notes a lie?
