Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I never said the math did not add up. It’s nonsensical.Which part of the math does not add up to you?
Can you answer coherently?
You have to be severely math challenged to accept that premise.
I never said the math did not add up.
Why would Trump agree to pay double for a supposed loan from Cohen?
Who said it was, for the defense to deny it?Defense never denied that this is in fact Weisselberg's handwriting, as presented. It's a fact.
The alternate explanation is “Legal fees” as somebody entered into the business records. The ONLY evidence that they were anything else came from Michael Cohen.His math on the payback is exactly what the checks paid to Cohen add up to, with no alternate explanaitons from Trump's defense.
You do have to be severely math challenged to accept payments totaling 420K for a 130K perfectly legal NDA.From this:
To this:
You can't make this up.
Any sane person on the jury.Who said it was, for the defense to deny it?
The alternate explanation is “Legal fees” as somebody entered into the business records. The ONLY evidence that they were anything else came from Michael Cohen.
Michael Cohen is the beginning, the end, and the middle, of the falsifying documents case against Trump.
That is not a sane explanation and there is NO credible evidence for it. The ONLY evidence presented of that insane idea was the given word of professional liar, thief, and Trump basher, Michal Cohen,Because he wanted to CONCEAL THE NDA PAYMENTS DURING THE ELECTION. Duh
There is no other sane explanation to these facts and thats exactly why the jury will find that Trump falsified the bussiness records.
That is not a sane explanation and there is NO credible evidence for it. The ONLY evidence presented of that insane idea was the given word of professional liar, thief, and Trump basher, Michal Cohen,
What?Any sane person on the jury.
They of course will belive that it is in fact Trump CFO handwriting if defense never objected that evidence as presented and never brought Weisselburg in to testify that he somehow didn't write it.
What were Trumps defense’s exact words when they accepted it?How did Cohen falsify Trump's CFO handwriting and get Trump's defense to accept it?
We KNOW the answer to that. Cohen billed those payments as retainer fees. If that was not true, Cohen should be tried for falsifying documents,How did he get Trump and his company to pay him exactly 12 x $35,000 payments for doing nothing?
We will see if the jury agrees.The incoherency of what you are posting is tough to overstate. NOTHING ADDS UP.
Nobody at the trial identified the handwriting as Wiesdelberg’s? Where would the jury get the idea that it is?
How would that be "caught" when the business wouldn't be filing it's tax returns until AFTER the election?Hold on.
Cohen paid Stormy to keep quiet about sex Trump didn't have with her, and then after he found out he wasn't going to take a pay cut to get a government job, he decided to take out a loan on his house, that Trump paid him back for not knowing what it was for?
Do you people even hear yourselves?
Seems pretty clear what happened. Cohen paid Stormy at Trump's behest because Trump was in an absolute panic after the Access Hollywood tape came out. But any large transfer like that would have been caught if he made it outright from his own funds. A
The defense did not refute most of the prosecutions case. That does not mean that they accept it all.This evidence was presented by prosecution at trial as Weisselberg's handwriting.
Defense never refuted that. It's therefore a settled fact to anyone not compeltely damaged in the head.
We KNOW the answer to that. Cohen billed those payments as retainer fees.
At least you have that in common.Guilty or not, he is and always still will be a sleazeball.
LOL...dude it's a GIVEN at this point that Merchon's rulings are going to result in any verdict against Trump being overturned! Biden and his minions don't care! That won't happen until long after the election is over. As for Merchon's career being stained? It already is.BS. Merchon's clearly prejudiced rullings would publicly undermine the case and get over-ruled on appeal, staining his career.
It would be counter-productive to the very bias you are claiming him to have.
LOL...dude it's a GIVEN at this point that Merchon's rulings are going to result in any verdict against Trump being overturned!
Sure sure, good luck with that laughable bs.The defense did not refute most of the prosecutions case. That does not mean that they accept it all.
Negotiating The NDA was legal work. Cohen billed for legal fees. If he did no legal work, he committed fraud, not that that would be a new thing for the only witness to Trump’s involvement.No he didn't. There is no actual backing to show any WORK BEING DONE.
No one claims he did.No sane jury will belive that Trump paid Cohen for doing nothing.
WHat was the "other crime" they proved?The prosecution did present evidence of another crime, as solid as they could, plus Weisselberg notes on how to falsify the hush money repayment to Cohen.
What you mean, I think.... is evidence that Trump was aware that the business records were falsified, that he signed 9 separate checks for....
I think enough was shown to be self evident, that Trump knew the business records were falsified....
We'll see what the jury thinks.... It's hard to guess how verdicts by juries turn out, imo.
Any chance of you admitting that the handwritten notes contained at least one lie?Sure sure, good luck with that laughable bs.
