What's funny is Kasich is only one who was ever involved in balancing the budget. Him not being popular is proof repubs don't really care.
I don't think it's a matter of "caring" for those who believe three trillion in govt receipts is "enough." Rather, it's a reality that it is not enough given the govt a supermajority of Americans want. Do you wish to deal with the reality or dream of returning to the days before FDR and LBJ?
Clinton balanced the budget and it should have stayed balanced. Paying lots of interest is not good. We could have what people want and still be balanced.
I don't think Slick's budget projected surpluses in the years coming up when ALL of the boomers are retired, and before the majority have died off. But, what the budgets would have done is paid down the amount of debt held by foreign govts and private investors. Then, when the boomers retire, we could re-issue new debt, and then pay that down starting after 2025 or so, and begin to prepare for the millennial retirement.
Given the financial meltdown and lower taxes today, and the unreality of any belief that we could actually raise marginal rates of the superwealthy, I'm not sure we can do very much beyond hope we don't bleed to death while cutting the growth of entitlements and raising some revenue from eliminating the tax expenditures that are politically possible to achieve. Possibly we could up the taxes on financial speculators ... as opposed to investors.