Kash Patel Undermines His "Big Case" Against Wisconsin Judge

[Marener]

Heard Garcia was listening to Peter Paul and Mary ' leaving on a jet plane' when he departed on his vacation.

Your insistence in making jokes about depriving people of human rights reinforces how deplorable you are.

 

[Hollie]

Your insistence in making jokes about depriving people of human rights reinforces how deplorable you are.

Your insistence on depriving people of human rights reinforces how you’re such a lowlife.

 

[martybegan]

The archives communication with Trump’s lawyers and testimony show there was no negotiation. There was nothing to negotiate about. Trump was required by law to send presidential records to the archives.

The archives threatened to get the DoJ involved before Trump sent some boxes to the archives, seemingly chosen at random, to try to get them to shut up.

You have a narrative that has no basis in reality.

There’s nothing political about the DoJ going after mishandling of classified documents. They do this all the time. Is it lawfare when they arrest other people who keep classified documents?

Only what was released. You pretend like you have all the information.

There was the question of Personal records vs. Presidential records.

Your narrative is based on your hatred of Trump and nothing more. Other people WHO WERENT PRESIDENT AT ALL WHEN THE DOCUMENTS IN QUESTION WERE CREATED have done the same thing with zero criminal prosecution. Biden is the prime example

The Biden DoJ was 100% political.

 

[Delldude]

Your insistence in making jokes about depriving people of human rights reinforces how deplorable you are.

Thank you from the bottom of my heart

 

[Marener]

Only what was released. You pretend like you have all the information.

There was the question of Personal records vs. Presidential records.

Your narrative is based on your hatred of Trump and nothing more. Other people WHO WERENT PRESIDENT AT ALL WHEN THE DOCUMENTS IN QUESTION WERE CREATED have done the same thing with zero criminal prosecution. Biden is the prime example

The Biden DoJ was 100% political.

There's no question about presidential records vs personal records. They're obviously presidential records to anyone who isn't a total hack. There's nothing personal about a document discussing the nuclear capabilities of a foreign nation. It's absolutely fucking stupid to suggest otherwise.

This isn't a narrative based on hatred, it's based on how the government is expected to protect national security by prosecuting people who take classified documents and obstruct justice. It's without question that anyone else who did this would be fully prosecuted, but when it comes to Trump you think it's just political.

Your narrative is based on Trump worship and your desire to see him be president. It's based on hatred of Dems. Anything that is contrary to that narrative requires you to come up with an excuse, any excuse, no matter how stupid and pathetic it is.

 

[Hollie]

Your insistence in making jokes about depriving people of human rights reinforces how deplorable you are.

Heard Garcia was listening to a mariachi band as he was assaulting his wife.

 

[martybegan]

There's no question about presidential records vs personal records. They're obviously presidential records to anyone who isn't a total hack. There's nothing personal about a document discussing the nuclear capabilities of a foreign nation. It's absolutely fucking stupid to suggest otherwise.

This isn't a narrative based on hatred, it's based on how the government is expected to protect national security by prosecuting people who take classified documents and obstruct justice. It's without question that anyone else who did this would be fully prosecuted, but when it comes to Trump you think it's just political.

Your narrative is based on Trump worship and your desire to see him be president. It's based on hatred of Dems. Anything that is contrary to that narrative requires you to come up with an excuse, any excuse, no matter how stupid and pathetic it is.

Evidently you haven't read the records act, which talks about the difference between Presidential and Personal records.

The rest of your drivel, Tl;dr.

 

[Man With A Plan]

View attachment 1105449

For those who might have a genuine concern this judge broke the law, this should infuriate you. Your own team is undermining the case against the judge. It is a prosecutorial axiom that you try the case in court, and not the in public, as Patel is doing. It’s also a prosecutorial axiom that you don’t give the defense any freebie arguments through your own actions, as Patel is doing in this case. If nothing else Patel is giving defense counsel leverage in any plea agreement negotiations. At worst, his repeated flouting of guidelines aimed at protecting a fair trial for defendants risks a sympathetic judge dismissing the case.

Kash Patel Undermines His Big Case Against Wisconsin Judge.

With much fanfare, as it turns out too much fanfare, the Trump Regime has arrested a Wisconsin judge. The Regime claims Judge Hannah Dugan hindered the arrest of an alien who was at the judge’s courtroom for a hearing by essentially sneaking him out...

www.dailykos.com

Shouldn't be a problem, since Trump is in such good standing with the judiciary...

You think that the Pam Bondi Department of Justice is going to plead this case out? Aren't you the naive one!

 

[Marener]

Thank you from the bottom of my heart

You live in a bubble.

Evidently you haven't read the records act, which talks about the difference between Presidential and Personal records.

The rest of your drivel, Tl;dr.

Didn’t I already lost the language from the act that says what a personal record is?

 

[Man With A Plan]

There's no question about presidential records vs personal records. They're obviously presidential records to anyone who isn't a total hack. There's nothing personal about a document discussing the nuclear capabilities of a foreign nation. It's absolutely fucking stupid to suggest otherwise.

This isn't a narrative based on hatred, it's based on how the government is expected to protect national security by prosecuting people who take classified documents and obstruct justice. It's without question that anyone else who did this would be fully prosecuted, but when it comes to Trump you think it's just political.

Your narrative is based on Trump worship and your desire to see him be president. It's based on hatred of Dems. Anything that is contrary to that narrative requires you to come up with an excuse, any excuse, no matter how stupid and pathetic it is.

Taking classified documents? You mean like when Senator Joe Biden stole them from a SKIF? Remind me again when it was that he was prosecuted for that, Marener?

 

[martybegan]

You live in a bubble.

Didn’t I already lost the language from the act that says what a personal record is?

English?

 

[Marener]

English?

I believe I already posted the language from the PRA which defines personal and presidential documents.

You have to be a totally delusional hack to think military documents about foreign countries nuclear capability could ever be considered a personal document.

 

[Papageorgio]

So obstructing justice is bad now. Because it was just fine when Trump did it.

It is wrong no matter who does it.

 

[Marener]

It is wrong no matter who does it.

It’s only wrong if you don’t get away with it.

That’s the MAGA way.

 

[Papageorgio]

It’s only wrong if you don’t get away with it.

That’s the MAGA way.

Sadly, it is the way of everyone. Democrats are defending a judicial representative that is charged with obstruction of justice. Everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

 

[Marener]

Sadly, it is the way of everyone. Democrats are defending a judicial representative that is charged with obstruction of justice. Everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

I’m not defending them.

 

[martybegan]

I believe I already posted the language from the PRA which defines personal and presidential documents.

You have to be a totally delusional hack to think military documents about foreign countries nuclear capability could ever be considered a personal document.

Notes on another document.

 

[Papageorgio]

I’m not defending them.

Thank you for the clarification, but I do want due process, just as I advocate for due Garcia.

 

[Marener]

Notes on another document.

Please speak in complete sentences.

Classified military documents cannot be considered personal documents. It’s idiotic.

 

[martybegan]

Please speak in complete sentences.

Classified military documents cannot be considered personal documents. It’s idiotic.

They can be classified personal documents, nothing it the statues says otherwise.