- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,637
- 52,001
- 3,600
- Thread starter
- #361
The AZ. Senate has and anyone one else that wants to. Fact, is fact.LOL
FruitLoops-to-English translation: you've never seen the evidence you claim exists
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The AZ. Senate has and anyone one else that wants to. Fact, is fact.LOL
FruitLoops-to-English translation: you've never seen the evidence you claim exists
The AZ. Senate has and anyone one else that wants to. Fact, is fact.
The Twitter files escaped your glance? You are the gullible one here. Try again.Lastamender is pretty gullible and clueless. No wonder he supports Trump and Lake. They provide an endless stream of bullshit for him to believe.
The AZ. Senate has and anyone one else that wants to. Fact, is fact.
First it was Trump going to win in the courts, now it's Kari Lake. Yet there isn't enough proof of fraud to fill a gnats pocket.The Twitter files escaped your glance? You are the gullible one here. Try again.
First it was Trump going to win in the courts, now it's Kari Lake. Yet there isn't enough proof of fraud to fill a gnats pocket.
Where's the "my pillow" guy with his prediction?FruitLoops will have EXPLOSIVE news in just 3-4 weeks.
Did you see the size of the rally?
Your side controls the courts and law enforcement, and media and justice has died. Does that mean you are right?
The AZ. Senate has and anyone one else that wants to. Fact, is fact.
There sure is.First it was Trump going to win in the courts, now it's Kari Lake. Yet there isn't enough proof of fraud to fill a gnats pocket.
How about all those Arizonans at the rally?'Uncertain' according to who?
Then why can't anybody provide any actual evidence?There sure is.
Nothing imaginary except for your dismissal of facts.Your assumptions and conspiracies aren't 'facts'. You assume that 144,000 of the ballots were fraudulent....despite being unable to prove it and not having evidence of it. You simply say it must be so.
And from your imaginary conspiracy, insist that we must 'disprove' whatever you make up.
Nope. You need to prove yourself right. And you keep failing because you keep starting with the imaginary conspiracy....and then try to find evidence to support it after.
What do you think the signature violation on all those ballots means?Then why can't anybody provide any actual evidence?
IF they're from 2020, then it means absolutely nothing.What do you think the signature violation on all those ballots means?
How about all those Arizonans at the rally?
What do you think the signature violation on all those ballots means?
Nothing imaginary except for your dismissal of facts.