Kari Lake Just Commited a Felony?

And once again, Mac nails it and gets bitched at anyway.

So weird, the way you guys don't argue with what I said but STILL bitch.

That really should tell you how messed up you are, but it won't.

Oh well. Tough shit.

:bye1:
Nailed? You do not even own a hammer, let alone how to use one. Hack.
 

Ultimately, Lake was happy about one thing—she said by referring her for felony charges, the Democrats ensured the information on the signature verification would go viral. She added that the Arizona Senate hearings uncovered key information too, such as over 10,000 votes that were never counted from Election Day (Election Day was heavily Republican-leaning, coincidentally). “These are absolutely fraudulent signatures that got counted as legal votes, and they’re not,” Lake added, returning to the signature verification issue. “Mail-in ballots are fraught with fraud. . .They’re afraid.”
 
Trump's advisor told him not to fast track the vaccine. You keep forgetting that.
No he did not. I don't care what Fauci says today because what he says doesn't hold weight....considering the fact that what he said years ago is different from what he says today, which doesn't take science into account. He's a political adviser....not an expert in the field with integrity and impeccable credentials. That ship has sailed. :iagree:
 
No he did not. I don't care what Fauci says today because what he says doesn't hold weight....considering the fact that what he said years ago is different from what he says today, which doesn't take science into account. He's a political adviser....not an expert in the field with integrity and impeccable credentials. That ship has sailed. :iagree:
 
No he did not. I don't care what Fauci says today because what he says doesn't hold weight....considering the fact that what he said years ago is different from what he says today, which doesn't take science into account. He's a political adviser....not an expert in the field with integrity and impeccable credentials. That ship has sailed. :iagree:
“The one thing that you would not want to see with a vaccine is getting an EUA (emergency use authorization) before you have a signal of efficacy,” Fauci told Reuters in a phone interview.

“One of the potential dangers if you prematurely let a vaccine out is that it would make it difficult, if not impossible, for the other vaccines to enroll people in their trial,” Fauci said.
“To me, it’s absolutely paramount that you definitively show that a vaccine is safe and effective, both,” Fauci said. “We would hope that nothing interferes with the full demonstration that a vaccine is safe and effective.”

Trump had tweeted on Saturday that “deep state” elements at the FDA were delaying progress on drugs and vaccines until after the Nov. 3 election in order to hurt his reelection bid.



Trump had an election to win. Remember.
 
No he did not. I don't care what Fauci says today because what he says doesn't hold weight....considering the fact that what he said years ago is different from what he says today, which doesn't take science into account. He's a political adviser....not an expert in the field with integrity and impeccable credentials. That ship has sailed. :iagree:
“The one thing that you would not want to see with a vaccine is getting an EUA (emergency use authorization) before you have a signal of efficacy,” Fauci told Reuters in a phone interview.

“One of the potential dangers if you prematurely let a vaccine out is that it would make it difficult, if not impossible, for the other vaccines to enroll people in their trial,” Fauci said.

“To me, it’s absolutely paramount that you definitively show that a vaccine is safe and effective, both,” Fauci said. “We would hope that nothing interferes with the full demonstration that a vaccine is safe and effective.”

Trump had tweeted on Saturday that “deep state” elements at the FDA were delaying progress on drugs and vaccines until after the Nov. 3 election in order to hurt his reelection bid.


 
“The one thing that you would not want to see with a vaccine is getting an EUA (emergency use authorization) before you have a signal of efficacy,” Fauci told Reuters in a phone interview.

“One of the potential dangers if you prematurely let a vaccine out is that it would make it difficult, if not impossible, for the other vaccines to enroll people in their trial,” Fauci said.

“To me, it’s absolutely paramount that you definitively show that a vaccine is safe and effective, both,” Fauci said. “We would hope that nothing interferes with the full demonstration that a vaccine is safe and effective.”

Trump had tweeted on Saturday that “deep state” elements at the FDA were delaying progress on drugs and vaccines until after the Nov. 3 election in order to hurt his reelection bid.


Fauci has 0 credibility. He has outright lied too many times.
 
“The one thing that you would not want to see with a vaccine is getting an EUA (emergency use authorization) before you have a signal of efficacy,” Fauci told Reuters in a phone interview.

“One of the potential dangers if you prematurely let a vaccine out is that it would make it difficult, if not impossible, for the other vaccines to enroll people in their trial,” Fauci said.
“To me, it’s absolutely paramount that you definitively show that a vaccine is safe and effective, both,” Fauci said. “We would hope that nothing interferes with the full demonstration that a vaccine is safe and effective.”

Trump had tweeted on Saturday that “deep state” elements at the FDA were delaying progress on drugs and vaccines until after the Nov. 3 election in order to hurt his reelection bid.



Trump had an election to win. Remember.
So you're saying that Fauci was trying to undermine Trump's re-election by delaying the approval of a vaccine?

Thanks for admitting the truth for once.
 
So you're saying that Fauci was trying to undermine Trump's re-election by delaying the approval of a vaccine?

Thanks for admitting the truth for once.
No. I am saying Trump threw socialist money at big pharma and fast tracked the vaccine against the advice of Fauci.

Trump didn't listen. Thanks for agreeing that Trump disregarded his own experts and fast tracked a vaccine the right is claiming is killing people.

Hopefully the new Repubs in the house will get investigate and hold tump accountable.
 
No. I am saying Trump threw socialist money at big pharma and fast tracked the vaccine against the advice of Fauci.

Trump didn't listen. Thanks for agreeing that Trump disregarded his own experts and fast tracked a vaccine the right is claiming is killing people.

Hopefully the new Repubs in the house will get investigate and hold tump accountable.
There's the rub. Trump cut the redtape and got it done.....and ever since then Biden and the Democrats have screwed everything up. The problem is that those vaccines wouldn't have been ready for years because they needed to be tested.
What we're finding out is repeated vaccinations has been causing horrible side-effects. One shot was a risk.....but insisting on repeated shots is what's killing people. Stop blaming Trump for the shitstorm you Democrats made out of it.
 
There's the rub. Trump cut the redtape and got it done.....and ever since then Biden and the Democrats have screwed everything up. The problem is that those vaccines wouldn't have been ready for years because they needed to be tested.
What we're finding out is repeated vaccinations has been causing horrible side-effects. One shot was a risk.....but insisting on repeated shots is what's killing people. Stop blaming Trump for the shitstorm you Democrats made out of it.
Trump didn't do shit Congress did, all Trump got to do was shut down the US.
 
I guess she tweeted some voter's signatures? Is a felony under Arizona law..uh oh~


Kari Lake could "find herself as a defendant in criminal court," if she continues pursuing her "frivolous election fraud case," according to a former federal prosecutor.
The Republican is continuing to claim she was the legitimate winner of Arizona's gubernatorial election in November, despite her claims of vote-rigging being dismissed by a Maricopa County judge.
Her Democratic opponent Katie Hobbs, who beat Lake by 17,000 votes, was sworn in as governor of Arizona on January 2.
On Monday, Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes asked the state Attorney General Kris Mayes to investigate Lake over the alleged unauthorized disclosure of voter signatures.
On January 23, Lake tweeted a graphic showing 16 Arizona voter signatures. She said they backed her claim that "nearly 40,000 ballots" were "illegally counted" for the contest.
In Fontes' letter to Mayes, his fellow Democrat, the secretary of state wrote that Lake's tweet was illegal. The law states that voter signatures "shall not be accessible or reproduced by any person other than the voter."
Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and president of West Coast Trial Lawyers, told Newsweek that Lake could be in serious legal trouble over both the signatures, and her electoral fraud claims.

Rahmani said: "Lake apparently committed a felony under Arizona law. Only the voter or an authorized person can publish voter signatures, and Lake is neither. The tweet to all of Lake's followers is all the evidence the Arizona attorney general needs if her office accepts the referral for prosecution.
Let us know when she's locked up, liar.
 
I guess she tweeted some voter's signatures? Is a felony under Arizona law..uh oh~


Kari Lake could "find herself as a defendant in criminal court," if she continues pursuing her "frivolous election fraud case," according to a former federal prosecutor.
The Republican is continuing to claim she was the legitimate winner of Arizona's gubernatorial election in November, despite her claims of vote-rigging being dismissed by a Maricopa County judge.
Her Democratic opponent Katie Hobbs, who beat Lake by 17,000 votes, was sworn in as governor of Arizona on January 2.
On Monday, Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes asked the state Attorney General Kris Mayes to investigate Lake over the alleged unauthorized disclosure of voter signatures.
On January 23, Lake tweeted a graphic showing 16 Arizona voter signatures. She said they backed her claim that "nearly 40,000 ballots" were "illegally counted" for the contest.
In Fontes' letter to Mayes, his fellow Democrat, the secretary of state wrote that Lake's tweet was illegal. The law states that voter signatures "shall not be accessible or reproduced by any person other than the voter."
Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and president of West Coast Trial Lawyers, told Newsweek that Lake could be in serious legal trouble over both the signatures, and her electoral fraud claims.

Rahmani said: "Lake apparently committed a felony under Arizona law. Only the voter or an authorized person can publish voter signatures, and Lake is neither. The tweet to all of Lake's followers is all the evidence the Arizona attorney general needs if her office accepts the referral for prosecution.
Such is the criminal, lawless right.
 

Forum List

Back
Top