Kari Lake Just Commited a Felony?

[skye]

I guess she tweeted some voter's signatures? Is a felony under Arizona law..uh oh~

MSN

www.msn.com

Kari Lake could "find herself as a defendant in criminal court," if she continues pursuing her "frivolous election fraud case," according to a former federal prosecutor.
The Republican is continuing to claim she was the legitimate winner of Arizona's gubernatorial election in November, despite her claims of vote-rigging being dismissed by a Maricopa County judge.
Her Democratic opponent Katie Hobbs, who beat Lake by 17,000 votes, was sworn in as governor of Arizona on January 2.
On Monday, Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes asked the state Attorney General Kris Mayes to investigate Lake over the alleged unauthorized disclosure of voter signatures.
On January 23, Lake tweeted a graphic showing 16 Arizona voter signatures. She said they backed her claim that "nearly 40,000 ballots" were "illegally counted" for the contest.
In Fontes' letter to Mayes, his fellow Democrat, the secretary of state wrote that Lake's tweet was illegal. The law states that voter signatures "shall not be accessible or reproduced by any person other than the voter."
Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and president of West Coast Trial Lawyers, told Newsweek that Lake could be in serious legal trouble over both the signatures, and her electoral fraud claims.
Rahmani said: "Lake apparently committed a felony under Arizona law. Only the voter or an authorized person can publish voter signatures, and Lake is neither. The tweet to all of Lake's followers is all the evidence the Arizona attorney general needs if her office accepts the referral for prosecution.

Now you got her.

 

[Skylar]

MAGAfascists? That seems to be an oxymoron.

“Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” Trump wrote in a post on the social network Truth Social and accused “Big Tech” of working closely with Democrats. “Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!"


Sounds like a fascist to me.

 

[Skylar]

You know our justice system is fucked or you have not been paying attention. The reality is they charge only who they want.

Or....you just fold the judiciary and all law enforcement into your delusional conspiracy.

Anything that doesn't ape the conspiracy becomes part of it.

That's batshit 101.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

I guess she tweeted some voter's signatures? Is a felony under Arizona law..uh oh~

MSN

www.msn.com

Kari Lake could "find herself as a defendant in criminal court," if she continues pursuing her "frivolous election fraud case," according to a former federal prosecutor.
The Republican is continuing to claim she was the legitimate winner of Arizona's gubernatorial election in November, despite her claims of vote-rigging being dismissed by a Maricopa County judge.
Her Democratic opponent Katie Hobbs, who beat Lake by 17,000 votes, was sworn in as governor of Arizona on January 2.
On Monday, Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes asked the state Attorney General Kris Mayes to investigate Lake over the alleged unauthorized disclosure of voter signatures.
On January 23, Lake tweeted a graphic showing 16 Arizona voter signatures. She said they backed her claim that "nearly 40,000 ballots" were "illegally counted" for the contest.
In Fontes' letter to Mayes, his fellow Democrat, the secretary of state wrote that Lake's tweet was illegal. The law states that voter signatures "shall not be accessible or reproduced by any person other than the voter."
Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and president of West Coast Trial Lawyers, told Newsweek that Lake could be in serious legal trouble over both the signatures, and her electoral fraud claims.
Rahmani said: "Lake apparently committed a felony under Arizona law. Only the voter or an authorized person can publish voter signatures, and Lake is neither. The tweet to all of Lake's followers is all the evidence the Arizona attorney general needs if her office accepts the referral for prosecution.

You wreak of fear

 

[Skylar]

You wreak of fear

What do we have to fear?

We won.

 

[Lastamender]

What do we have to fear?

We won.

You called getting lied to and believing it winning?

 

[Skylar]

You called getting lied to and believing it winning?

Lied to.....says your mindless conspiracy. Your argument is circular. Where your conspiracy is both your accusation AND your evidence.

Accusations aren't evidence. Conspiracies aren't evidence.

Which is why you fail.

 

[lennypartiv]

These bastards are not above the law.

But somehow Democrats are above the law when they steal elections.

 

[Skylar]

But somehow Democrats are above the law when they steal elections.

What election did they supposedly steal?

 

[okfine]

I’m not bothered by the mumblings of slobbering nose picking idiots.

Then quit acting like one.

 

[MarcATL]

But somehow Democrats are above the law when they steal elections.

Hey you guys, look, another one just outed themselves as an idiot.

#LOLGOP #TooFunny #CLASSIC

 

[tahuyaman]

Then quit acting like one.

You’re a real quick witted one aren’t you…

 

[tahuyaman]

“Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” Trump wrote in a post on the social network Truth Social and accused “Big Tech” of working closely with Democrats. “Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!"


Sounds like a fascist to me.

Sounds like another idiot to me.

 

[Skylar]

Sounds like another idiot to me.

Idiots are those that try to enable Trump and his call to terminate the constitution.

 

[okfine]

You’re a real quick witted one aren’t you…

And who the fuck are you?

 

[mudwhistle]

Hey you guys, look, another one just outed themselves as an idiot.

#LOLGOP #TooFunny #CLASSIC

Only a fucking idiot doesn't understand what the bold function is for.

 

[Lastamender]

Or....you just fold the judiciary and all law enforcement into your delusional conspiracy.

Anything that doesn't ape the conspiracy becomes part of it.

That's batshit 101.

That is the way organized crime has thrived for decades.

 

[Skylar]

That is the way organized crime has thrived for decades.

Believing nonsensical fantasies and embracing delusion is how the mentally ill have existed for decades.

Again, you start with your conspiracy.....and then desperately scramble for evidence after.

That's not how reality works. Its exactly why you keep failing.

 

[theHawk]

These bastards are not above the law.

What law?

 

[theHawk]

I guess she tweeted some voter's signatures? Is a felony under Arizona law..uh oh~

MSN

www.msn.com

Kari Lake could "find herself as a defendant in criminal court," if she continues pursuing her "frivolous election fraud case," according to a former federal prosecutor.
The Republican is continuing to claim she was the legitimate winner of Arizona's gubernatorial election in November, despite her claims of vote-rigging being dismissed by a Maricopa County judge.
Her Democratic opponent Katie Hobbs, who beat Lake by 17,000 votes, was sworn in as governor of Arizona on January 2.
On Monday, Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes asked the state Attorney General Kris Mayes to investigate Lake over the alleged unauthorized disclosure of voter signatures.
On January 23, Lake tweeted a graphic showing 16 Arizona voter signatures. She said they backed her claim that "nearly 40,000 ballots" were "illegally counted" for the contest.
In Fontes' letter to Mayes, his fellow Democrat, the secretary of state wrote that Lake's tweet was illegal. The law states that voter signatures "shall not be accessible or reproduced by any person other than the voter."
Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and president of West Coast Trial Lawyers, told Newsweek that Lake could be in serious legal trouble over both the signatures, and her electoral fraud claims.
Rahmani said: "Lake apparently committed a felony under Arizona law. Only the voter or an authorized person can publish voter signatures, and Lake is neither. The tweet to all of Lake's followers is all the evidence the Arizona attorney general needs if her office accepts the referral for prosecution.

So now Tweets are “illegal”?