Kamala Once Again Shows That Democrats Are The Party Of Slavery

Biff_Poindexter

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2018
26,844
14,771
1,415
USA


Consider the case of Kamala Harris. Should her Indian mother pay reparations to her Jamaican father for his partial ancestry from slaves? Should she foot half the bill? Or should her father, whose ancestors also owned slaves, be taxed based on his degree of descent from slave-owners?

Not only is Kamala Harris practically a slave owner, she should have to pay reparations...To show how much of an anti-black human being this poor excuse for a woman really is -- she was a ultra-conservative prosecutor who put more black men in jail than all slave plantations combined -- she would had made her slave owner ancestors proud...

I mean, let's face it..she isn't even black...and with riots and looting going on in the streets, all of these black thugs running rampant and committing crime -- Kamala's record on prosecuting blacks is exactly the reason why we know she will work with BLM and Antifa to make sure blacks are never arrested and are allowed to run wild in our beautiful suburbs...

Luckily, Trump will win and restore order and dominate the streets....
 
Kamala is practically a slave owner, how do you reason that response?
Her great great great grand daddy was a slave master, therefore she is basically a slave owner....

At the very least she is a descendant of slave owners, like most Democrats are
Great great grandaddy which is no way eludes to Kamala never having owned any slaves. Guilt by associations via generations past is not a truth it is a fallacy. Just because Jefferson owned slaves doesn't mean his relatives one hundred years later where slave owners when they were not.
 
Kamala is practically a slave owner, how do you reason that response?
Her great great great grand daddy was a slave master, therefore she is basically a slave owner....

At the very least she is a descendant of slave owners, like most Democrats are
Great great grandaddy which is no way eludes to Kamala never having owned any slaves. Guilt by associations via generations past is not a truth it is a fallacy. Just because Jefferson owned slaves doesn't mean his relatives one hundred years later where slave owners when they were not.
Well then why do we want to take down monuments and statues of slave owners??

Stop trying to defend slavery...that is disgusting...
 
Kamala is practically a slave owner, how do you reason that response?
Her great great great grand daddy was a slave master, therefore she is basically a slave owner....

At the very least she is a descendant of slave owners, like most Democrats are
Great great grandaddy which is no way eludes to Kamala never having owned any slaves. Guilt by associations via generations past is not a truth it is a fallacy. Just because Jefferson owned slaves doesn't mean his relatives one hundred years later where slave owners when they were not.
Well then why do we want to take down monuments and statues of slave owners??

Stop trying to defend slavery...that is disgusting...
They want to take down slave owner statues because they don't want them in the public domain anymore. Yet these statues don't mean that the descendants of these slave owners want to be slave owners or that they are slave owners.. Which makes the attempt to make Kamala a slave owner an illogical conclusion.
 
She isn't even half "African American" if her dad was a Black Jamaican. Unless Jamaicans consider themselves African. Besides, I didn't know Americans are to blame for Blacks being brought to Jamaica!
 

Forum List

Back
Top