Justice Department could present a new indictment against James Comey to a grand jury this week

[DonGlock26]

"CNN 12/2/2025


Justice Department could present a new indictment against James Comey to a grand jury this week


By Katelyn Polantz, Holmes Lybrand, CNN

Updated: 8:37 AM EST, Tue December 2, 2025

Source: CNN

The Justice Department could present a new indictment against James Comey to a grand jury as soon as this week, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.

Whatever comes next may happen quickly, and no matter what, the sources told CNN, prosecutors will likely present new indictments against the former FBI director and New York Attorney General Letitia James to grand juries in the Eastern District of Virginia.

The previous cases against Comey and James were dismissed last week after a judge found that interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan didn’t have the authority of a prosecutor when the indictments were returned in late September and early October. The Trump administration within hours announced they intended to appeal, though they haven’t done so yet. Internal strategy discussions since then appear to have pushed back that filing, one of the sources said.

Comey had previously pleaded not guilty to charges that he lied to Congress five years ago. James pleaded not guilty to mortgage fraud-related charges.

After the dismissals of their cases, FBI Director Kash Patel said over the weekend that “multiple responses” could come as early as “right after Thanksgiving” in the dismissed case against Comey."

Justice Department could present a new indictment against James Comey to a grand jury this week | CNN Politics

lite.cnn.com

What does Comey want for Christmas? A cake with a file in it? A box of virtue signalling sea shells?
An undisclosed blanket pardon from President Otto Penn?

 

[g5000]

I believe the Trump Administration is upping their game and bringing out Roseanne Barr to be the prosecutor.

 

[JoeB131]

The problem for a new indictment is that the statue of limitations has already passed.

 

[g5000]

The problem for a new indictment is that the statue of limitations has already passed.

.
Doesn't matter. The new prosecutor will invoke the "OH YEAH SEZ YOU!" rule of jurisprudence.

.

 

[Crepitus]

I believe the Trump Administration is upping their game and bringing out Roseanne Barr to be the prosecutor.

Really? I was figuring on this guy as the logical next step down the ladder from halligan.

 

[elektra]

The problem for a new indictment is that the statue of limitations has already passed.

There is no such thing, as a statue of limitations

democrats are of such low iq the dont even know how to pronounce the word so they can spell

Statute of limitations. They aint statues.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

"CNN 12/2/2025


Justice Department could present a new indictment against James Comey to a grand jury this week


By Katelyn Polantz, Holmes Lybrand, CNN

Updated: 8:37 AM EST, Tue December 2, 2025

Source: CNN

The Justice Department could present a new indictment against James Comey to a grand jury as soon as this week, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.

Whatever comes next may happen quickly, and no matter what, the sources told CNN, prosecutors will likely present new indictments against the former FBI director and New York Attorney General Letitia James to grand juries in the Eastern District of Virginia.

The previous cases against Comey and James were dismissed last week after a judge found that interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan didn’t have the authority of a prosecutor when the indictments were returned in late September and early October. The Trump administration within hours announced they intended to appeal, though they haven’t done so yet. Internal strategy discussions since then appear to have pushed back that filing, one of the sources said.

Comey had previously pleaded not guilty to charges that he lied to Congress five years ago. James pleaded not guilty to mortgage fraud-related charges.

After the dismissals of their cases, FBI Director Kash Patel said over the weekend that “multiple responses” could come as early as “right after Thanksgiving” in the dismissed case against Comey."

Justice Department could present a new indictment against James Comey to a grand jury this week | CNN Politics

lite.cnn.com

What does Comey want for Christmas? A cake with a file in it? A box of virtue signalling sea shells?
An undisclosed blanket pardon from President Otto Penn?

I'm not sure how strong his case against the DOJ was originally on the malicious prosecution charges, but if they refile the charges against him again now, after the statute of limitations on bringing the charges against him are alleged to have lapsed (the reason they were rushing to get the charges filed and everything was so sloppy), then they'd just be handing him a cause against them.

 

[g5000]

There is no such thing, as a statue of limitations

democrats are of such low iq the dont even know how to pronounce the word so they can spell

Statute of limitations. They aint statues.

Quiet, piggy.

Glass houses, dear. Glass houses.

 

[elektra]

Quiet, piggy.

Glass houses, dear. Glass houses.

**** you

 

[g5000]

**** you

And just like that, the grammar Nazi fails to use proper punctuation!

Glass houses, kiddo. Glass houses.

 

[elektra]

And just like that, the grammar Nazi fails to use proper punctuation!

Glass houses, kiddo. Glass houses.

You stalk me as the grammar police, then I point out how you do it while using piss poor grammar.

Projecting, dumbass, you are projecting, now go back to ******* yourself

 

[jknowgood]

The problem for a new indictment is that the statue of limitations has already passed.

You forget, you loons took outdated mistomenors and turned them into 34 felonies. Therefore we can do as we please!

 

[MagicMike]

There is no such thing, as a statue of limitations

democrats are of such low iq the dont even know how to pronounce the word so they can spell

Statute of limitations. They aint statues.

Don't you know how to use an apostrophe?

 

[elektra]

Don't you know how to use an apostrophe?

The correct way to ask your question is;
Do you know how to use an apostrophe.

You stated; Do not you know

Pretty ******* stupid

 

[JoeB131]

You forget, you loons took outdated mistomenors and turned them into 34 felonies. Therefore we can do as we please!

Well, no, you can't, because the Judges can see it for the bullshit it is.

Trump himself argued he couldn't be held accountable While he was President, that such matters had to wait until he left office.

 

[candycorn]

I’m looking forward to bringing this up when it’s dismissed as well.

 

[jknowgood]

Well, no, you can't, because the Judges can see it for the bullshit it is.

Trump himself argued he couldn't be held accountable While he was President, that such matters had to wait until he left office.

What part of outdated do you not understand?

 

[JoeB131]

What part of outdated do you not understand?

They weren't outdated, as Trump himself argued that the charges should be extended until after he left office.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

The correct way to ask your question is;
Do you know how to use an apostrophe.

You stated; Do not you know

Pretty ******* stupid

Poor grammar doesn’t make you dumb. Saying that the statute of limitation doesn’t exist makes you dumb.. extremely so.

 

[jknowgood]

They weren't outdated, as Trump himself argued that the charges should be extended until after he left office.

You go with that, you loons are the most outraged pussies I've ever seen.