Grand Jury Foreman refutes activist judge, documents Comey indictments were done correctly

[Crepitus]

Now they know different and so informed the court. Unlike Democrats and "not Democrats" clinging to the same lies no matter what.

Sure kid, sure.

 

[Crepitus]

WHAT CHANGED?

LIAR. This isn't MSNBC....

They originally said the full jury hadn't reviewed the charges, then they changed their story.

Come on, kid. this has been all over the news for the last day or two.

 

[Billiejeens]

They originally said the full jury hadn't reviewed the charges, then they changed their story.

Come on, kid. this has been all over the news for the last day or two.

You love to be lied to by your cult

Why?

 

[Crepitus]

You love to be lied to by your cult

Why?

Are you stupid or something? This has been all over the news for a day or two now. These are the facts of what happened. Nobody is lying except you.

 

[westwall]

Both the foreperson and the prosecutors agree that the Grand Jury saw everything it was supposed to see.

1:15



Comey will do hard time. Get used to that idea.

He probably won't. He absolutely should, but the democrat corruption is very deeply entrenched.

 

[Billiejeens]

Are you stupid or something? This has been all over the news for a day or two now. These are the facts of what happened. Nobody is lying except you.

Amazing echo chamber you have.

"Facts" have been in the news for 10 years that literally have no basis in reality.

 

[Crepitus]

Amazing echo chamber you have.

"Facts" have been in the news for 10 years that literally have no basis in reality.

I give up. Go ahead and be a misinformed moron. You are beyond help and I'm getting a headache.

 

[Billiejeens]

I give up. Go ahead and be a misinformed moron. You are beyond help and I'm getting a headache.


View attachment 1186147

10 years every thing that you believed was proven false.

You should bang it harder.

 

[EMH]

They originally said the full jury hadn't reviewed the charges

No, the judge lied about that, and the Foreman of the Grand Jury refuted the judge.


"They originally said" with "they" being MSNBC lying just like you and the judge.

 

[scruffy]

They still are.
That video by Senator Mark Kelly and Ellise Slotkin urging military insurrection against Trump is an example: he's ex-NASA and she's ex-CIA.

Nobody is "ex" CIA.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

There are a lot of "Alliance for Treason Against America" members pretending to be judges in America.... and they need to be "replaced."

Grand jury properly voted on James Comey’s indictment, foreman claims in blow to defense: ‘Eliminates any doubt’

The Sept. 25 grand jury transcript “conclusively refutes” that there was an issue with the voting process, prosecutors said.

nypost.com

The article is entirely based on what the prosecutor said.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

They originally said the full jury hadn't reviewed the charges, then they changed their story.

Come on, kid. this has been all over the news for the last day or two.

Who’s “they “?

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

No, the judge lied about that, and the Foreman of the Grand Jury refuted the judge.


"They originally said" with "they" being MSNBC lying just like you and the judge.

Can you quote the judge’s words?

 

[EMH]

The article is entirely based on what the prosecutor said.

and the Jury Foreman, liar.

 

[EMH]

Can you quote the judge’s words?

read the article. The judge said the indictments were problematic and got a week of non stop media coverage lying about it, as the Jury Foreman refuted it.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

read the article. The judge said the indictments were problematic and got a week of non stop media coverage lying about it, as the Jury Foreman refuted it.

Where in the article does it say that the foreman said that all jurors reviewed the second package?
All you have is a right wing newspaper, claiming that the foreman refused it.

I think you were not expecting us to know that the New York Post is the right wing newspaper

 

[Seymour Flops]

The article is entirely based on what the prosecutor said.

LoL! Does that upset you?

At least the prosecutor is an actual person who lets his name be used, not "a source in a position to know," or the other nonsense you swallow from the media.

 

[Crepitus]

No, the judge lied about that, and the Foreman of the Grand Jury refuted the judge.


"They originally said" with "they" being MSNBC lying just like you and the judge.

No, dumb-ass. out here in reality it went down just the way I described.

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/james-comey-doj-case-hearing-11-19-25

DOJ admits not all grand jury members saw the final version of the indictment against James Comey

Comey's lawyers want the judge to dismiss the case with prejudice, meaning it couldn't be brought for a second time.

www.nbcnews.com

James Comey's indictment wasn't reviewed by full grand jury, prosecutor admits

Attorneys for James Comey have accused the Department of Justice of charging the former FBI Director because President Donald Trump asked them to.

www.fox5dc.com

Now stop being an idiot.

 

[Crepitus]

Who’s “they “?

Halligan her own bad self.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

LoL! Does that upset you?

At least the prosecutor is an actual person who lets his name be used, not "a source in a position to know," or the other nonsense you swallow from the media.

You made it up the source in a position to know thing, which no one cited in this thread