Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
“Unworthy of your time” says the guy who keeps coming back to lash out for me because I provided actual sources that showed you made shit up and thought you could get away with it.I’m not the one here who’s weak. That’s you, little one. You’re a fraud. You are dishonest and I find you unworthy of this much time.
So stick around. I don’t care. But everyone sees you now for what you are. Meanwhile, when you post, try to stay on topic. Your inability to be honest also should be rectified.
Fuck off. You’re just a dishonest troll.“Unworthy of your time” says the guy who keeps coming back to lash out for me because I provided actual sources that showed you made shit up and thought you could get away with it.
If you had a source which backed you up, I’m sure you’d be touting it rather than whining.
what was your source?“Unworthy of your time” says the guy who keeps coming back to lash out for me because I provided actual sources that showed you made shit up and thought you could get away with it.
If you had a source which backed you up, I’m sure you’d be touting it rather than whining.
You can run off anytime you want. I’m going to patiently await any factual responses.Fuck off. You’re just a dishonest troll.
You have my permission to sit there with your thumb up your ass. You reject facts and you are dishonesty so I’m done with you. GFY.You can run off anytime you want. I’m going to patiently await any factual responses.
You said you were done a long time ago, yet you keep coming back for some reason.You have my permission to sit there with your thumb up your ass. You reject facts and you are dishonesty so I’m done with you. GFY.
You said you were done a long time ago, yet you keep coming back for some reason.
Your entire argument is extrapolated and fabricated from a single sentence in a NY Post article which is not known for their journalistic integrity (it might even be an OpEd, I’d have to go back and look). You have nothing.
I'm only saying that the FBI will do what is necessary to save their country from Trump and fascism. They will interpret that as protecting their Constitution. They won't stop short of breaking the law.so you don't give a fuck the FBI is running around prosecuting former and potential presidents.
I’m not the one trying to flee from a disagreement by making no arguments. You keep saying you’re done, but you keep coming back.You are a liar and a coward. Go pester someone else. I’m not playing games with you lying libtard troll bitches anymore.
The simple fact of the matter is that the former President committed no crimes of any kind in continuing to possess the records.
he used information about how all presidents do the same as trump. how is that a fabrication?I’m not the one trying to flee from a disagreement by making no arguments. You keep saying you’re done, but you keep coming back.
To declare Trump innocent, you have to fabricate stories about Obama. It’s dishonest.
It’s not complicated. Trump had secret documents. The DoJ wanted them back. Trump refused.
So he gets raided. FAFO
I’m not the one trying to flee from a disagreement by making no arguments.
He lied about it and got caught in a lie.he used information about how all presidents do the same as trump. how is that a fabrication?
what did he lie about?He lied about it and got caught in a lie.
Obama didn’t take his records. The national archives did.
You just keep coming back again and again.Yes. You are. That’s why you lied.
Congratulations. You are now offered officially the newest resident in the Phantom Zone we call “iggy list.”
Buh bah.
I just said ffswhat did he lie about?
the fact you ignored it was noted posts ago. Just saying.You just keep coming back again and again.
If you ever get brave enough to provide a counter argument instead of emotional outbursts, I promise to throw you a parade.
Well, it certainly is a huge hit to democracy. I don't know if it means it is over. Democrats have a history of shooting themselves in the foot and everything they try to do always seems to backfire on them spectacularly.If they try to disqualify Trump using the security state, democracy is over in the US. You know that right?
but obammy did take them. you are confused. Only the presidents can remove them.I just said ffs
He didn’t. The National Archives took them. I posted several links which were upsetting to the other poster so they turned into a whiny child.but obammy did take them. you are confused. Only the presidents can remove them.
here you goThere is no evidence. Precisely who was digitizing the records isn’t even stated in the article. Somehow you assumed Obama was doing it himself.
That’s not the case.
Why Trump is wrong to suggest Obama personally kept ‘33 million pages of documents’ - Poynter
The National Archive digitized Obama’s presidential records and sent them to a facility in College Park, Maryland.www.poynter.org
But the National Archives continue to own and control the documents. During the digitization project, a memorandum of understanding between the National Archives and the foundation said, “NARA will not be transferring control, custody, or ownership over any of the Records to the Foundation, the Vendor, or any other third party.”
There’s nothing contradictory. You’re just making shit up based on some vague unsourced sentences from a questionable newspaper.
nypost.com
