Clementine
Platinum Member
- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,826
- 350
Has anyone here ever served on a jury? What did you like or dislike about it?
It's such a crucial part of our judicial system to have peers willing to sit in a jury box and take their duty seriously.
People make jokes all the time about ways to get out of jury duty and so many just hate the idea of being stuck performing this obligation.
I think more people would be willing to do it if it didn't pose so many difficulties. The current rules say that financial hardship or lack of transportation are not acceptable excuses for getting out of jury duty. People get paid a small amount, about enough to cover gas money.
It is difficult for those living paycheck to paycheck and, these days, that means the majority of people. If the potential juror is the breadwinner, it can be a hardship to go several weeks without working. Either you give up your precious paid vacation, if you have time on the books, or you go without the paychecks for however long the trial takes. That would totally stress some people out and sure doesn't foster a healthy attitude towards something so important. When my husband had to sit on jury duty, I think he was paid $10 a day for gas. Luckily, we had savings to pay the mortgage and other bills, but I wonder how some would get through it.
I fear many would want to rush through the deliberation process and go along with others just to get out of there.
I am curious as to what others think about the current rules regarding jury duty. Do you think it would be better to give people more leeway and allow them to decline due to financial harships or should we offer compensation to those who would suffer financially for being a juror? Don't we want jurors who focused on the trial instead of their own situation?
It's such a crucial part of our judicial system to have peers willing to sit in a jury box and take their duty seriously.
People make jokes all the time about ways to get out of jury duty and so many just hate the idea of being stuck performing this obligation.
I think more people would be willing to do it if it didn't pose so many difficulties. The current rules say that financial hardship or lack of transportation are not acceptable excuses for getting out of jury duty. People get paid a small amount, about enough to cover gas money.
It is difficult for those living paycheck to paycheck and, these days, that means the majority of people. If the potential juror is the breadwinner, it can be a hardship to go several weeks without working. Either you give up your precious paid vacation, if you have time on the books, or you go without the paychecks for however long the trial takes. That would totally stress some people out and sure doesn't foster a healthy attitude towards something so important. When my husband had to sit on jury duty, I think he was paid $10 a day for gas. Luckily, we had savings to pay the mortgage and other bills, but I wonder how some would get through it.
I fear many would want to rush through the deliberation process and go along with others just to get out of there.
I am curious as to what others think about the current rules regarding jury duty. Do you think it would be better to give people more leeway and allow them to decline due to financial harships or should we offer compensation to those who would suffer financially for being a juror? Don't we want jurors who focused on the trial instead of their own situation?