Turley is a liberal, moron. He voted for Hillary, not Trump.LOLOL
Oh, no! The rightards on gatewaypundit are freaking out over the Honorable Judge Sullivan! Poor babies.
Yes, he is a consistent political hack.Nope, this judge is being consistent. He already rejected this nonsense by Flynn last year when he tried pushing this nonsense.Well the Devil appears to be in the details.....and the Judge is advocating against Flynn for political reasons.Appeal what? He pled guilty.No.There are still charges. The DOJ petioned the judge to drop them. It's his decision to make.
I see "Thinker" is at it again.
Flynn's case is still very much open, he can and probably will still get convicted. Let me know what part of that you are too stupid to understand.
Since there are no longer any charges, what will he be convicted for...Einstein.
The case isn't the judge VS Michael Flynn.
The judge is there only to act as an arbiter of the facts of the case. He doesn't decide who gets charged or who doesn't. That's up to the State.
It’s a good point, and not an easy case. Flynn is already charged and already pled guilty. It’s unheard of that the charges get dropped in this manner without something new coming to light which materially changes the facts and that just hasn’t happened.
I do think the judge is not at liberty to decline the motion, I could be wrong. But I hope that he calls in the DoJ and demand answers about their shenanigans.
He is at liberty to decline the motion and proceed with sentencing, however, it would get appealed right away.
What this judge will do is carefully dismantle DOJ's motion, so DOJ can't claim it wasn't adequately dealt with on appeal.
Barr’s team is trying to argue that he pled to non-crime. That the lying to FBI was not illegal because it wasn’t material to the investigation.
Lead prosecutor on this case strongly disagreed and quit right before this motion was filed.Judge has also ruled that the lying was in fact material. He’ll just beat that horse into the ground now before sentencing.
So he calls in an outsider to present some sort of ridiculous argument that Flynn committed perjury when he plead guilty.
Gleason has nothing to do with this case....but the Obama people and the Hillary people want to try to force Trump to pardon Flynn to discredit him.
In truth....the excuse they're using to string this out never has been done before in a criminal trial....only civil suits.
It's really just punishment because the judge doesn't like Flynn.
That's really all this is. Nothing but legal harassment.
Yeah, it's the team not yet in charge.
Well the Devil appears to be in the details.....and the Judge is advocating against Flynn for political reasons.Appeal what? He pled guilty.No.There are still charges. The DOJ petioned the judge to drop them. It's his decision to make.
I see "Thinker" is at it again.
Flynn's case is still very much open, he can and probably will still get convicted. Let me know what part of that you are too stupid to understand.
Since there are no longer any charges, what will he be convicted for...Einstein.
The case isn't the judge VS Michael Flynn.
The judge is there only to act as an arbiter of the facts of the case. He doesn't decide who gets charged or who doesn't. That's up to the State.
It’s a good point, and not an easy case. Flynn is already charged and already pled guilty. It’s unheard of that the charges get dropped in this manner without something new coming to light which materially changes the facts and that just hasn’t happened.
I do think the judge is not at liberty to decline the motion, I could be wrong. But I hope that he calls in the DoJ and demand answers about their shenanigans.
He is at liberty to decline the motion and proceed with sentencing, however, it would get appealed right away.
What this judge will do is carefully dismantle DOJ's motion, so DOJ can't claim it wasn't adequately dealt with on appeal.
Barr’s team is trying to argue that he pled to non-crime. That the lying to FBI was not illegal because it wasn’t material to the investigation.
Lead prosecutor on this case strongly disagreed and quit right before this motion was filed.Judge has also ruled that the lying was in fact material. He’ll just beat that horse into the ground now before sentencing.
www.forbes.com
Kinda makes you wonder why he was lying about it then...
Clearly these communists are exploring the boundaries of our justice system to see what they can get away with.As my degree is in Criminal Justice, not Law, I am quite uncertain, but I believe that Amicus Briefs, are not for criminal, but rather civil cases."D.C. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order Tuesday indicating that he'll soon accept "amicus curiae," or "friend of the court" submissions, in the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn -- essentially allowing the court to use an "ask the audience" lifeline in what has already proved to be an unpredictable and chaotic prosecution.
Sullivan's minute order indicated that an upcoming scheduling order would clarify the parameters of who specifically could submit the amicus briefs, which are submissions by non-parties that claim an interest in the case. Sullivan specifically said he anticipates that "individuals and organizations" will file briefs "for the benefit of the court."
The move attracted immediate criticism -- and a planned ethics complaint against Sullivan, who had previously refused to hear amicus briefs in the case. ("Options exist for a private citizen to express his views about matters of public interest, but the Court's docket is not an available option," Sullivan wrote in the past.)
"Judge Sullivan, who denied leave to file amicus briefs when he knew third parties would have spoken favorably of Flynn, now solicits briefs critical of Flynn," independent journalist Michael Cernovich wrote on Twitter. "This is a violation of the judicial oath and applicable ethical rules."
It appears Sullivan, who viciously rebuked Flynn in court based on the lies presented in court now doesn't want to simply drop the case and walk away with egg on his face.
The easiest thing to do to make this all go away quietly would have been to allow the case to be dropped....but it appears Sullivan wants the circus to continue...
Flynn judge to allow 'amicus' submissions, delaying immediate resolution and drawing planned ethics complaint
D.C. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order Tuesday indicating he'll soon accept "amicus curiae," or "friend of the court" submissions, in the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn -- drawing immediate scrutiny and a planned ethics complaint against Sullivan, who...www.foxnews.com
.
I know right. ******* Barr forced out the Flynn prosecutors so he could bring in his own interim, unconfirmed lackey to file this petition. Outrageous!
2000 DOJ professionals signed a letter saying that what Barr is doing is a perversion of the justice process.Well the Devil appears to be in the details.....and the Judge is advocating against Flynn for political reasons.Appeal what? He pled guilty.No.There are still charges. The DOJ petioned the judge to drop them. It's his decision to make.
I see "Thinker" is at it again.
Flynn's case is still very much open, he can and probably will still get convicted. Let me know what part of that you are too stupid to understand.
Since there are no longer any charges, what will he be convicted for...Einstein.
The case isn't the judge VS Michael Flynn.
The judge is there only to act as an arbiter of the facts of the case. He doesn't decide who gets charged or who doesn't. That's up to the State.
It’s a good point, and not an easy case. Flynn is already charged and already pled guilty. It’s unheard of that the charges get dropped in this manner without something new coming to light which materially changes the facts and that just hasn’t happened.
I do think the judge is not at liberty to decline the motion, I could be wrong. But I hope that he calls in the DoJ and demand answers about their shenanigans.
He is at liberty to decline the motion and proceed with sentencing, however, it would get appealed right away.
What this judge will do is carefully dismantle DOJ's motion, so DOJ can't claim it wasn't adequately dealt with on appeal.
Barr’s team is trying to argue that he pled to non-crime. That the lying to FBI was not illegal because it wasn’t material to the investigation.
Lead prosecutor on this case strongly disagreed and quit right before this motion was filed.Judge has also ruled that the lying was in fact material. He’ll just beat that horse into the ground now before sentencing.
Horseshit. That's just something you Trump tools like the sound of.
2000 DOJ professionals signed a letter saying that what Barr is doing is a perversion of the justice process.
2,000 Former FBI And DOJ Officials Call On Barr To Resign
In an open letter, former agents and prosecutors accused Barr of “doing the President’s personal bidding rather than acting in the public interest.”
These are Democrats and well as Republicans who belive DOJ's actions are nothing but political favoritism for Flynn.
I believe Flynn clearly broke the law. Not because of anything about politics, but because on the facts of the case. His lies to FBI were clearly unlawful, clearly established, clearly pled guilty to. If his name was Clinton it would not make a difference as to my opinion. Law breaking is law breaking, plain and simple.
There is only one reason Barr is interfering in such unprecedented ways in Flynn's and Roger Stone cases - they are Trump's personal associates and Barr has absolutely no problem acting like Trump's personal lawyer and putting his thumb on the scale of justice on behalf of Trump.
My daughter signed a letter yesterday opposing the local McDonalds no longer carrying / serving ice cream....2000 DOJ professionals signed a letter saying that what Barr is doing is a perversion of the justice process.Well the Devil appears to be in the details.....and the Judge is advocating against Flynn for political reasons.Appeal what? He pled guilty.No.There are still charges. The DOJ petioned the judge to drop them. It's his decision to make.
I see "Thinker" is at it again.
Flynn's case is still very much open, he can and probably will still get convicted. Let me know what part of that you are too stupid to understand.
Since there are no longer any charges, what will he be convicted for...Einstein.
The case isn't the judge VS Michael Flynn.
The judge is there only to act as an arbiter of the facts of the case. He doesn't decide who gets charged or who doesn't. That's up to the State.
It’s a good point, and not an easy case. Flynn is already charged and already pled guilty. It’s unheard of that the charges get dropped in this manner without something new coming to light which materially changes the facts and that just hasn’t happened.
I do think the judge is not at liberty to decline the motion, I could be wrong. But I hope that he calls in the DoJ and demand answers about their shenanigans.
He is at liberty to decline the motion and proceed with sentencing, however, it would get appealed right away.
What this judge will do is carefully dismantle DOJ's motion, so DOJ can't claim it wasn't adequately dealt with on appeal.
Barr’s team is trying to argue that he pled to non-crime. That the lying to FBI was not illegal because it wasn’t material to the investigation.
Lead prosecutor on this case strongly disagreed and quit right before this motion was filed.Judge has also ruled that the lying was in fact material. He’ll just beat that horse into the ground now before sentencing.
Horseshit. That's just something you Trump tools like the sound of.
2000 DOJ professionals signed a letter saying that what Barr is doing is a perversion of the justice process.
2,000 Former FBI And DOJ Officials Call On Barr To Resign
In an open letter, former agents and prosecutors accused Barr of “doing the President’s personal bidding rather than acting in the public interest.”
These are Democrats and well as Republicans who belive DOJ's actions are nothing but political favoritism for Flynn.
I believe Flynn clearly broke the law. Not because of anything about politics, but because on the facts of the case. His lies to FBI were clearly unlawful, clearly established, clearly pled guilty to. If his name was Clinton it would not make a difference as to my opinion. Law breaking is law breaking, plain and simple.
There is only one reason Barr is interfering in such unprecedented ways in Flynn's and Roger Stone cases - they are Trump's personal associates and Barr has absolutely no problem acting like Trump's personal lawyer and putting his thumb on the scale of justice on behalf of Trump.
So?
Wow....nice rant.
Appeal what? He pled guilty.No.There are still charges. The DOJ petioned the judge to drop them. It's his decision to make.
I see "Thinker" is at it again.
Flynn's case is still very much open, he can and probably will still get convicted. Let me know what part of that you are too stupid to understand.
Since there are no longer any charges, what will he be convicted for...Einstein.
The case isn't the judge VS Michael Flynn.
The judge is there only to act as an arbiter of the facts of the case. He doesn't decide who gets charged or who doesn't. That's up to the State.
It’s a good point, and not an easy case. Flynn is already charged and already pled guilty. It’s unheard of that the charges get dropped in this manner without something new coming to light which materially changes the facts and that just hasn’t happened.
I do think the judge is not at liberty to decline the motion, I could be wrong. But I hope that he calls in the DoJ and demand answers about their shenanigans.
He is at liberty to decline the motion and proceed with sentencing, however, it would get appealed right away.
What this judge will do is carefully dismantle DOJ's motion, so DOJ can't claim it wasn't adequately dealt with on appeal.
Barr’s team is trying to argue that he pled to non-crime. That the lying to FBI was not illegal because it wasn’t material to the investigation.
Lead prosecutor on this case strongly disagreed and quit right before this motion was filed.Judge has also ruled that the lying was in fact material. He’ll just beat that horse into the ground now before sentencing.
2000 DOJ professionals signed a letter saying that what Barr is doing is a perversion of the justice process.Well the Devil appears to be in the details.....and the Judge is advocating against Flynn for political reasons.Appeal what? He pled guilty.No.There are still charges. The DOJ petioned the judge to drop them. It's his decision to make.
I see "Thinker" is at it again.
Flynn's case is still very much open, he can and probably will still get convicted. Let me know what part of that you are too stupid to understand.
Since there are no longer any charges, what will he be convicted for...Einstein.
The case isn't the judge VS Michael Flynn.
The judge is there only to act as an arbiter of the facts of the case. He doesn't decide who gets charged or who doesn't. That's up to the State.
It’s a good point, and not an easy case. Flynn is already charged and already pled guilty. It’s unheard of that the charges get dropped in this manner without something new coming to light which materially changes the facts and that just hasn’t happened.
I do think the judge is not at liberty to decline the motion, I could be wrong. But I hope that he calls in the DoJ and demand answers about their shenanigans.
He is at liberty to decline the motion and proceed with sentencing, however, it would get appealed right away.
What this judge will do is carefully dismantle DOJ's motion, so DOJ can't claim it wasn't adequately dealt with on appeal.
Barr’s team is trying to argue that he pled to non-crime. That the lying to FBI was not illegal because it wasn’t material to the investigation.
Lead prosecutor on this case strongly disagreed and quit right before this motion was filed.Judge has also ruled that the lying was in fact material. He’ll just beat that horse into the ground now before sentencing.
Horseshit. That's just something you Trump tools like the sound of.
2000 DOJ professionals signed a letter saying that what Barr is doing is a perversion of the justice process.
2,000 Former FBI And DOJ Officials Call On Barr To Resign
In an open letter, former agents and prosecutors accused Barr of “doing the President’s personal bidding rather than acting in the public interest.”
These are Democrats and well as Republicans who belive DOJ's actions are nothing but political favoritism for Flynn.
I believe Flynn clearly broke the law. Not because of anything about politics, but because on the facts of the case. His lies to FBI were clearly unlawful, clearly established, clearly pled guilty to. If his name was Clinton it would not make a difference as to my opinion. Law breaking is law breaking, plain and simple.
There is only one reason Barr is interfering in such unprecedented ways in Flynn's and Roger Stone cases - they are Trump's personal associates and Barr has absolutely no problem acting like Trump's personal lawyer and putting his thumb on the scale of justice on behalf of Trump.
So?
Judges determine when someone is in contempt of court, i.e. if someone lied before them. That's what Sullivan is trying to determineAppeal what? He pled guilty.No.There are still charges. The DOJ petioned the judge to drop them. It's his decision to make.
I see "Thinker" is at it again.
Flynn's case is still very much open, he can and probably will still get convicted. Let me know what part of that you are too stupid to understand.
Since there are no longer any charges, what will he be convicted for...Einstein.
The case isn't the judge VS Michael Flynn.
The judge is there only to act as an arbiter of the facts of the case. He doesn't decide who gets charged or who doesn't. That's up to the State.
It’s a good point, and not an easy case. Flynn is already charged and already pled guilty. It’s unheard of that the charges get dropped in this manner without something new coming to light which materially changes the facts and that just hasn’t happened.
I do think the judge is not at liberty to decline the motion, I could be wrong. But I hope that he calls in the DoJ and demand answers about their shenanigans.
He is at liberty to decline the motion and proceed with sentencing, however, it would get appealed right away.
What this judge will do is carefully dismantle DOJ's motion, so DOJ can't claim it wasn't adequately dealt with on appeal.
Barr’s team is trying to argue that he pled to non-crime. That the lying to FBI was not illegal because it wasn’t material to the investigation.
Lead prosecutor on this case strongly disagreed and quit right before this motion was filed.Judge has also ruled that the lying was in fact material. He’ll just beat that horse into the ground now before sentencing.
WTF dood, judges don't prosecute...dumbass.
www.nationalreview.com
