5 Questions Keeping the Epstein Files Alive

[Senior]

5 questions keeping the Epstein files alive

Perspective: Judge Emmet Sullivan’s order didn't invent a new Epstein mystery. It showed why the old one is still open.

www.newsweek.com

1. What exactly is still missing after millions of pages?​

2. Whose names were redacted, and under what rule?​

3. Did the redaction process protect victims or expose them?​

4. What decisions did Todd Blanche personally make?​

5. Are the real missing files government records—or private silence?​

 

[Cassandro]

5 questions keeping the Epstein files alive

Perspective: Judge Emmet Sullivan’s order didn't invent a new Epstein mystery. It showed why the old one is still open.

www.newsweek.com

1. What exactly is still missing after millions of pages?​

2. Whose names were redacted, and under what rule?​

3. Did the redaction process protect victims or expose them?​

4. What decisions did Todd Blanche personally make?​

5. Are the real missing files government records—or private silence?​

The only way to satisfy your curiosity would be to release all the unredacted files, which would expose the names of victims and innocent people. (The guilty ones are already subject to criminal investigation.) Would that make you happy?

 

[TimFitz]

The real question is why is Donald Trump spending so much political capital trying to cover it up?

 

[TimFitz]

"The guilty ones are already subject to criminal investigation.)"

Why would you make such and obviously false claim?

 

[odanny]

The real question is why is Donald Trump spending so much political capital trying to cover it up?

Because no ones name appears in them more often this his.

 

[odanny]

"The guilty ones are already subject to criminal investigation.)"

Why would you make such and obviously false claim?

Cause he is MAGA, it's what they do.