Judge rules deportation was “an illegal act”

[struth]

Nope. The judge holds the hearings, not Trump.

A judge did, in 2019

 

[jc456]

Nope. The judge holds the hearings, not Trump.

What is the judge gonna do?

 

[jc456]

Nope. The judge holds the hearings, not Trump.

Ice had warrants. Guess who signs warrants?

 

[jc456]

I bet all the MAGAs chant "if it is brown flush it down"

Post one link? Looks like that is your saying! Kkk man

sick, that is "MAGA"

this guy should have never been deported. He was shielded from deportation.

Judge said otherwise. Warrants were issued. You failed .

 

[kyzr]

If I prove YOU wrong, will you take a one month vacation?

Why would I take a month off?
Besides, what do you do if I prove you wrong?
You know neither of will admit it anyway, we both have links that prove we're right.

 

[Zafira Cherry]

Why would I take a month off?
Besides, what do you do if I prove you wrong?
You know neither of will admit it anyway, we both have links that prove we're right.

coward

 

[jc456]

coward

Still waiting for what the judge gonna do

 

[Nostra]

Yes. And you don’t get to live here since 2019 with an existing removal order.

Yep.

 

[Nostra]

Generally, you must apply for asylum in the US within one year of your last arrival in the United States. However, exceptions may apply, and it's crucial to seek legal advice if you miss this deadline.

Sounds like he had a great lawyer.

So this gangbanger was about a decade late.

 

[Nostra]

I bet all the MAGAs chant "if it is brown flush it down"

sick, that is "MAGA"

this guy should have never been deported. He was shielded from deportation.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement expelled Kilmar Abrego Garcia last month despite an immigration judge’s 2019 ruling that shielded him from deportation to his native El Salvador, where he faced likely persecution by local gangs.

Yep, rival gangs want to kill him.

 

[Concerned American]

GREENBELT, Md. (AP) — A federal judge on Friday ordered the Trump administration to arrange for the return of a Maryland man to the United States after he was mistakenly deported to a notorious El Salvador prison, while a U.S. government attorney was at a loss to explain what happened.

The US must return a Maryland man mistakenly deported to an El Salvador prison, judge says​

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement expelled Kilmar Abrego Garcia last month despite an immigration judge’s 2019 ruling that shielded him from deportation to his native El Salvador, where he faced likely persecution by local gangs.

This undated photo provided by CASA, an immigrant advocacy organization, in April 2025, shows Kilmar Abrego Garcia. (CASA via AP)

Before she issued her ruling, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis described Abrego Garcia’s deportation as “an illegal act” and pressed Justice Department attorney Erez Reuveni for answers, many of which he didn’t have.

The US must return a Maryland man mistakenly deported to an El Salvador prison, a judge says

A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to arrange for the return of a Maryland man to the United States after he was mistakenly deported to a notorious El Salvador prison.

apnews.com

Now we're getting somewhere.

Well, the chief justice of the SCOTUS disagrees and over ruled the lower court. Maybe this will be a notice to stay in their own lane.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Well, the chief justice of the SCOTUS disagrees and over ruled the lower court. Maybe this will be a notice to stay in their own lane.

Justice Roberts didn’t overrule the judge. He issued an administrative stay of the implementation so that Garcia’s lawyers could supply a response which is due tomorrow.

If he overruled the judge there would be no need for a response.

WW

 

[Concerned American]

Justice Roberts didn’t overrule the judge. He issued an administrative stay of the implementation so that Garcia’s lawyers could supply a response which is due tomorrow.

If he overruled the judge there would be no need for a response.

WW

The lower court ruled that the admin return the person in question immediately. Roberts ruled that the admin did not have to comply. That is over ruling. SMH. You guys will grasp at anything.

 

[berg80]

Well, the chief justice of the SCOTUS disagrees and over ruled the lower court. Maybe this will be a notice to stay in their own lane.

Shocking......not. I said to my wife this morning that I bet they delay a decision until they can come up with a made up rationale to overrule the lower court.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. on Monday temporarily blocked a trial judge’s order directing the United States to return a Salvadoran migrant it had inadvertently deported.

The chief justice, acting on his own, issued an “administrative stay,” an interim measure meant to give the justices some breathing room while the full court considers the matter.

The order came just hours after the administration asked the court to block the trial judge’s order instructing the government to return the migrant, Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, by 11:59 p.m. on Monday.

Judge Paula Xinis of the Federal District Court in Maryland had said the administration committed a “grievous error” that “shocks the conscience” by sending Mr. Abrego Garcia, to a notorious prison in El Salvador last month.

Supreme Court Temporarily Blocks Order to Return Man Wrongly Deported to El Salvador

The chief justice, acting on his own, issued an “administrative stay,” a brief pause meant to give the court time to consider the matter. The justices are expected to act in the coming days.

www.nytimes.com

 

[MagicMike]

They are in the country illegally, their due process is limited to what we say it is.

Not true.
The SCOTUS has consistently upheld the rights to due process for even illegal immigrants.
It's based upon the philosophy that ALL men (people) are created equal.
Not just U.S. citizens.


Immigrants to the U.S. face a wide array of federal laws, regulations, rules and policies, but only one U.S. Constitution. One of its amendments impacts what procedures and process can be used when the federal government decides the status of the person. For someone in Kentucky seeking help in an immigration matter, constitutional protections may be critical for a positive outcome.

“Due process” is a phrase in the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It was originally added to protect the rights of ex-slaves who were emancipated during and after the Civil War. It also applies to non-U.S. citizens who enter or are seeking to immigrate into the U.S. What process is due depends on the situation.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that due process permits people to exercise their legal rights in a court proceeding permitted by American law. These parties can contest an action proposed by the government in front of a neutral decision maker, like a judge, but it need not be a judge to comply with constitutional protections.

Undocumented immigrants have a right to due process. Anyone on U.S. soil is protected by the constitution’s stated right to due process — even a person who illegally entered or stayed in the country. Generally those inside our borders enjoy greater legal protections than those at the border.

How much process is “due” depends on the situation. Those coming into the U.S. illegally and are ordered deported have a right to appeal those decisions. But Congress can create limited procedures that are constitutionally sufficient for noncitizens detained at the border.

Immigrants who are ordered to leave the country can fight deportation through civil proceedings involving immigration courts and judges overseen by the Justice Department. Individuals in such situations must secure legal representation from a skilled Kentucky deportation lawyer who can guide them through the process. With the right attorney, immigrants have the opportunity to appeal unfavorable decisions to the Board of Immigration Appeals, ensuring a comprehensive and diligent defense strategy.

What Is “Due Process” for Immigrants? | Carman & Fullerton

Undocumented immigrants have a right to due process. Learn more here. If you have questions about immigration law, call us now for a consultation.

carmanfullerton.com

 

[Concerned American]

Shocking......not. I said to my wife this morning that I bet they delay a decision until they can come up with a made up rationale to overrule the lower court.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. on Monday temporarily blocked a trial judge’s order directing the United States to return a Salvadoran migrant it had inadvertently deported.

The chief justice, acting on his own, issued an “administrative stay,” an interim measure meant to give the justices some breathing room while the full court considers the matter.

The order came just hours after the administration asked the court to block the trial judge’s order instructing the government to return the migrant, Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, by 11:59 p.m. on Monday.

Judge Paula Xinis of the Federal District Court in Maryland had said the administration committed a “grievous error” that “shocks the conscience” by sending Mr. Abrego Garcia, to a notorious prison in El Salvador last month.

Supreme Court Temporarily Blocks Order to Return Man Wrongly Deported to El Salvador

The chief justice, acting on his own, issued an “administrative stay,” a brief pause meant to give the court time to consider the matter. The justices are expected to act in the coming days.

www.nytimes.com

LOL, thanks for the link. I think it substantiates my post.

 

[Zafira Cherry]

PITIFUL .. DOTARD deported a Protected Asylum seeker.

Abrego Garcia entered the United States in 2011 when he was 16 to escape gang violence in El Salvador, according to his lawyers. Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, the attorney representing Abrego Garcia, said last week his client is not a member of MS-13, as the government has alleged, but said that's an issue for an immigration judge to address.

 

[Zafira Cherry]

They are in the country illegally, their due process is limited to what we say it is.

False,


Aliens physically present in the United States, regardless of their legal status, are recognized as persons guaranteed due process of law by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Even if ones presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection. No need for a "hearing", no need for "temporary status"
It is written, do your homework

 

[Zafira Cherry]

And prosecute Donald Trump for violating this man's constitutional rights?

Impeach 47. Impeach 47. Impeach 47. Impeach 47.

 

[Zafira Cherry]

Illegals don't get due process, they get deported and wait for a hearing.

Aliens physically present in the United States, regardless of their legal status, are recognized as persons guaranteed due process of law by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Even if ones presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection. No need for a "hearing", no need for "temporary status"
It is written, do your homework.