Judge overseeing Trump classified documents case deals blows to special counsel Jack Smith

[The5thHorseman]

/——/ Oh ——- give me a few examples so I can be better informed. I’m sure you have a list handy.

Who won the 2020 election?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Let's see if we can get back to discussing the topic, instead of letting it continue to devolve into childish insults.

From the Honorable Judge Cannon's ruling as posted by the OP:

Waltine Nauta shall file a response to the Motion for a Garcia hearing [ECF No. 97]
on or before August 17, 2023. Among other topics as raised in the Motion, the
response shall address the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury
proceeding to continue to investigate and/or to seek post-indictment hearings on
matters pertinent to the instant indicted matter in this district.

A Garcia hearing is hearing to make sure that defendants who are represented by the same attorney each understand the possible conflict of interest that such an arrangement entails, and that that they understand that they are entitled to an attorney who represents them alone. Pretty routine.

But Cannon asked Nauta (through his attorney, who is also Trump's attorney) to address the question of why the prosecutor would continue to seek indictments via a grand jury out of the district of her court. It appears to be blatant jury shopping, which is why the judge would question it.

Supporters of Jack Smith's efforts, what reason would be valid for doing that?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

/——/

That's right.

Still are. Tuck that tail.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Let's see if we can get back to discussing the topic, instead of letting it continue to devolve into childish insults.

From the Honorable Judge Cannon's ruling as posted by the OP:

Waltine Nauta shall file a response to the Motion for a Garcia hearing [ECF No. 97]
on or before August 17, 2023. Among other topics as raised in the Motion, the
response shall address the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury
proceeding to continue to investigate and/or to seek post-indictment hearings on
matters pertinent to the instant indicted matter in this district.

A Garcia hearing is hearing to make sure that defendants who are represented by the same attorney each understand the possible conflict of interest that such an arrangement entails, and that that they understand that they are entitled to an attorney who represents them alone. Pretty routine.

But Cannon asked Nauta (through his attorney, who is also Trump's attorney) to address the question of why the prosecutor would continue to seek indictments via a grand jury out of the district of her court. It appears to be blatant jury shopping, which is why the judge would question it.

Supporters of Jack Smith's efforts, what reason would be valid for doing that?

That's not what the judge said. That's what you made up.

Please stick to the topic.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Who won the 2020 election?

/——-/ According to the Electoral College, Biden won. Seems you would have known that.

 

[Rawley]

They are wrong then. It is his right.

Also Menendez should resign now. So should Fetterman, Greene, Boebert, Feinstein, and McConnell.

Politicians should do what is right,

You add Joey to the list and we have a deal.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You add Joey to the list and we have a deal.

And Trump quit his campaign, and we are good.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

/——-/ According to the Electoral College, Biden won. Seems you would have known that.

*which itself relies on the vote count.

But you knew that.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

2020 was a fair election. Only bubbleheads have a problem with that.

 

[The5thHorseman]

/——-/ According to the Electoral College, Biden won. Seems you would have known that.

But I'm asking you...

 

[struth]

You should stop trying to bluff people smarter than you.

Haha says the guy that was unaware of a defendant right to a speedy trial

Haha

 

[struth]

But I'm asking you...

Haha he just answered it! Are you that ducking stupid that you don’t know our president is elected via the electoral college? Haha not surprised, it’s in the text above the bill of rights that you were unaware of

 

[Marener]

Go read the thread. The posters I responded to didn’t believe it was the defendants right, one even asked for the legal authority I was referring to

That’s not at all what I said.

You can’t even understand basic language. I’d recommend you try a different hobby more suitable for your skills (or lack thereof).

 

[bigrebnc1775]

With all the evidence Jack Smith could die and do the trial Weekend at Bernie's style and still get Trump tossed in prison

Trump will never going to prison snowflake

 

[bigrebnc1775]

IF P01135809 is as innocent as you believe, then you should welcome a speedy trial, as should he.

P01135809 should welcome the speedy trial. IF he is as innocent as he claims he would NOT want the trial delayed.

You can thank me for my vote when Trump is president Trump in 2025.

 

[struth]

That’s not at all what I said.

You can’t even understand basic language. I’d recommend you try a different hobby more suitable for your skills (or lack thereof).

Haha yoj literally said the SCOTUS disagrees with me! Hahaha

The cited a case showing the opposite cause you can’t comprehend a legal opinion

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Haha yoj literally said the SCOTUS disagrees with me! Hahaha

The cited a case showing the opposite cause you can’t comprehend a legal opinion

The supreme court once again is going to ***** slap Jackie smith

 

[struth]

The supreme court once again is going to ***** slap Jackie smith

They did in his last political prosecution

 

[Marener]

Haha yoj literally said the SCOTUS disagrees with me! Hahaha

The cited a case showing the opposite cause you can’t comprehend a legal opinion

I disagree with this.

Correct, the right to a speedy trial belongs to the individual, trump

I didn’t say Trump doesn’t have a right to a speedy trial. I said that the right doesn’t solely belong to Trump and that the public has a right to a speedy trial as well.

 

[Cellblock2429]

But I'm asking you...

/——-/ I told you. I go by the Electoral College vote, not the popular vote like some libs like to squawk about. I can’t make it plainer.