rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 308,503
- 263,778
- 3,615
WTF?A judge doesn’t get to override Trump’s determination in what is constitutional.
Do you know what courts are for?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WTF?A judge doesn’t get to override Trump’s determination in what is constitutional.
That would be completely irrational and nearly destroy the operations of our judicial system.I think if they can, SCOTUS should make a definitive ruling that the court has zero authority to order the Congress or Executive Branch to do anything
Not the slaughter part....Oh lord, not the insulting and offensive comparison to Jewish citizens who were rounded up and sent to their slaughter.
Courts uphold that the Federal Government controls immigration & the BorderWTF?
Do you know what courts are for?
They probable do, but they’re so high on the MAGA miasma, they’ve lost all rational thought and logic.WTF?
Do you know what courts are for?
It’s a link to the PDF with the decision. Read it. It’s actually quite appealing that the government would act in such a blatantly unconstitutional manner.Didn't take me anywhere.
It isn’t restricted to CA. It’s a feeling from the robed tool that new national policy has to be implementedThat is not what the Supreme Court said
They did not restrain lower courts from ruling on the Executive Branch. Only that they could not make a nationwide ruling.
This ruling applies to California only
A liberal ploy againDidn't take me anywhere.
Now you are getting closeCourts uphold that the Federal Government controls immigration & the Border
Courts rule on existing law and don’t make up new requirements on the fly to issue make pretend new lawWTF?
Do you know what courts are for?
Now you are talkingCourts rule on existing law and don’t make up new requirements on the fly to issue make pretend new law
Unfortunately I believe you are correct, Democrats will attempt anything they believe they can get away with in the moment just look at prior to the election last year when they wanted to do away with the first amendment..... only to be thumping it now how it justifies their riots.I agree.
But the problems stemming from this Admin will be very apparent when Democrats control the Government again. Democrats are very adept at abusing license granted to them by using similar tactics as Republicans giving their leaders license to bruise/violate average citizen rights.
We will have ICE agents targeting Republican neighborhoods to just detain everyone for 24 hours....during Election days.
No different from Nazis rounding up Jews.
The Jews couldn't stop the Nazis then....the average US citizen won't be able to stop ICE from detaining them either.
Homan is correct. Reasonable suspicion is used to approach and conduct an interrogation. When they approach to interrogate, their behavior at that time is reasonable to detain if they are violent or are acting suspiciously.You obviously aren’t keeping up with the basis of the case. Homan has said publicly they don’t need reasonable suspicion to detain people. ICE just arrests anyone they want. Even citizens.
Which is not the predication for this errant judges declarationNow you are talking
And the 4th Amendment is an existing law
Which illegals slated for Deportation do not haveNow you are getting close
But they must do so without violating Constitutional rights
He isn't a citizen, you're stating they are arresting American citizens. See these lies are going to get our ice agents killed. He is an illegal he doesn't get the rights American citizens have.It’s a link to the PDF with the decision. Read it. It’s actually quite appealing that the government would act in such a blatantly unconstitutional manner.
it’s embarrassing.
Here’s another link if that doesn’t work for you.
No. It would restore the constitutional separation of powers that the Founders intended.That would be completely irrational and nearly destroy the operations of our judicial system.
A leftist district judge is overriding the duly-elected U.S. President’s orders, under the opinion it’s not constitutional, and you accuse OUR side of being authoritarians?Yes, the judge does get to override him if he’s violating the constitution. That’s exactly what judges do. They stop the government from violating the constitution.
If Trump told ICE to arrest people without probable cause, he should be impeached.
I swear to God, you guys are just so horny for authoritarianism.