While leftists have no solutions, no plans for anything and simply fall to the floor in feet-stomping tantrums as their protected criminal class is deported, it falls to republicans to provide meaningful options.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are many "whistleblowers" out there, such as the ACLU, who selectively defend civil liberties.You don’t do research and actively avoid things that contradict your narrative.
Such as the whistleblower report.
As a condition of driving on our roads, a driver is required to show a license and registration. You are not required to show citizenship and no passengers are required to show ID.lol....rw said we dont live in a society were we need to show papers......he didnt differentiate either....i just showed him we do have to show papers...
Based on Supreme Court precedent, there is no general requirement to carry identification or identify oneself to law enforcement unless there is reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.lol....rw said we dont live in a society were we need to show papers......he didnt differentiate either....i just showed him we do have to show papers...
Because illegals surround themselves with similar people, that provides reasonable suspicion, and could lead to arrests of other illegals in their vicinity.Now you are advocating GUILT BY ASSOCIATION?
Then why are people required to show ID in traffic stops? Buying alcohol and spirits? Purchasing firearms? Vehicles?Based on Supreme Court precedent, there is no general requirement to carry identification or identify oneself to law enforcement unless there is reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.
Kolender v. Lawson (1983): This case dealt with a California law requiring "loiterers" or "wanderers" to provide "credible and reliable" identification when requested by a peace officer.
That’s a terrible attempt at comparison. Driving is a privilege. Illegally crossing the border is not,As a condition of driving on our roads, a driver is required to show a license and registration. You are not required to show citizenship and no passengers are required to show ID.
What do you call newsom lying about the raid on the pot farm? Then we find out there were child slaves working there? That's the lies you loons are spreading trying to stop the deportation of illegals.And what do you call rounding up and traumatizing a legal couple with young children based on no evidence or probable cause ?
What part of the ruling violates the rule of law?Another weird name that Dems keep appointing who have zero loyalty to the rule of law. Seriously, Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong?
What part of the ruling violates the rule of law?
Probable cause is a cornerstone of our legal system
you didnt say drivers did you?....you said we dont have to show "papers".....to late for damage control....As a condition of driving on our roads, a driver is required to show a license and registration. You are not required to show citizenship and no passengers are required to show ID.
Has nothing to do with needing probable cause to detain someoneWhat do you call newsom lying about the raid on the pot farm? Then we find out there were child slaves working there? That's the lies you loons are spreading trying to stop the deportation of illegals.
What do you call newsom lying about the raid on the pot farm? Then we find out there were child slaves working there? That's the lies you loons are spreading trying to stop the deportation of illegals.
As is the Constitution. Why did democrats choose to ignore the Constitution regarding immigration law?What part of the ruling violates the rule of law?
Probable cause is a cornerstone of our legal system
This post makes very little sense and only serves to ignore and obfuscate the point I made.There are many "whistleblowers" out there, such as the ACLU, who selectively defend civil liberties.
They only took this case because it aligned with their goals, not for any concern for civil liberty. If they were concerned with that, they wouldn't have touched these people with a ten-foot pole.
We don’t.you didnt say drivers did you?....you said we dont have to show "papers".....to late for damage control....
Or is it because I don't subscribe to these emotional arguments of yours?This post makes very little sense and only serves to ignore and obfuscate the point I made.
Rightwinger already answered that.Then why are people required to show ID in traffic stops? Buying alcohol and spirits? Purchasing firearms? Vehicles?
Sorry, that case doesn't hold up. If an illegal is breaking the law, the cops will ask for their ID. If it's a traffic stop, they need an ID.
LinkAs is the Constitution. Why did democrats choose to ignore the Constitution regarding immigration law?
I didn't ask him. I asked you.Rightwinger already answered that.