Judge Denies CA Gov. Newsom's request to stop Trump from deploying Marines to LA

[OldFlame]

Well we aren't 100% sure he can yet. The judge allowed them to stay until he hears arguments.

Yet Clinton did in LA, did you cry about that as well, and demand that the 'courts' have the final say? Why do we really need anything other than the courts, in your opinion they trump everything, no pun intended.

 

[OldFlame]

700 Marines arrive in L.A. area amid ICE protests as Newsom files suit to block deployment

Some 700 Marines have arrived to join National Guard troops in Los Angeles. California Gov. Gavin Newsom asked a court to block the deployment.

www.cbsnews.com

They didn't send themselves.

So you're supporting Newsom and the mayor to let the riots continue unabated?

 

[pknopp]

Yet Clinton did in LA, did you cry about that as well, and demand that the 'courts' have the final say? Why do we really need anything other than the courts, in your opinion they trump everything, no pun intended.

You are among the masses that believes anything and everything is about your politics. You have been brainwashed into thinking like this.

Don't support what Trump is doing? Well you had to have supported Clinton.

I did no such thing.

In the end the courts are the last word. Otherwise you just have a dictator.

 

[pknopp]

So you're supporting Newsom and the mayor to let the riots continue unabated?

I already noted that I think very little of Newsom and the Democrats are making a huge mistake giving him the stage.

 

[OldFlame]

You are among the masses that believes anything and everything is about your politics. You have been brainwashed into thinking like this.

Don't support what Trump is doing? Well you had to have supported Clinton.

I did no such thing.

In the end the courts are the last word. Otherwise you just have a dictator.

Then let's get rid of the rest of the government, it serves no purpose if it has no power. If one person in a black robe has the final say on anything and everything, we have no 'republic'.

 

[OldFlame]

I already noted that I think very little of Newsom and the Democrats are making a huge mistake giving him the stage.

Thinking 'very little of Newsom' is not the same thing as opposing the continuing stand down that he and the mayor are ordering.

 

[pknopp]

Then let's get rid of the rest of the government, it serves no purpose if it has no power. If one person in a black robe has the final say on anything and everything, we have no 'republic'.

It has the power to make the laws. No clue about "One person" as that is never the case.

 

[pknopp]

Thinking 'very little of Newsom' is not the same thing as opposing the continuing stand down that he and the mayor are ordering.

I do NOT support what either side is doing. How's that?

 

[OldFlame]

I do NOT support what either side is doing. How's that?

So just let everything burn then, let the lawlessness continue, and screw all of the innocent people who are hurt in the process. So much for any so called 'empathy' you claim to have, it's only reserved for specific people apparently.

 

[pknopp]

So just let everything burn then, let the lawlessness continue, and screw all of the innocent people who are hurt in the process. So much for any so called 'empathy' you claim to have, it's only reserved for specific people apparently.

No. Mine is reserved for a system of equal justice. Pick up the illegal AND arrest the guy hiring him.

 

[OldFlame]

No. Mine is reserved for a system of equal justice. Pick up the illegal AND arrest the guy hiring him.

So let it continue to burn is you solution, thanks for confirming.

 

[pknopp]

So let it continue to burn is you solution, thanks for confirming.

Rant ignored.

 

[OldFlame]

Rant ignored.

Hardly a rant, just a statement of fact.

 

[struth]

Read the judges order your idiot!!!

The Judge made ruling on the motion, the hearing is TOMORROW.

Granting the Governments motion to be able to respond is not denying the plaintiff's motion.

WW

View attachment 1121990

What about it? They scheduled a hearing on the petition, nobody has claimed the Court didn't.

What the Court denied was Cali's request for an immediate injunction. What part of that don't you get? Read the Axios article. Why is this hard for you to grasp? This is why Trump is currently allowed to deploy the troops.

 

[WorldWatcher]

What about it? They scheduled a hearing on the petition, nobody has claimed the Court didn't.

What the Court denied was Cali's request for an immediate injunction. What part of that don't you get? Read the Axios article. Why is this hard for you to grasp? This is why Trump is currently allowed to deploy the troops.

The judge didn't deny the injuction. The hearing is schedule for tomorrow.

Now where in the order (repeated below) did the Judge deny anything in regards to the plaintiff. Granting the DOJ request to respond is NOT denying the petition.

WW

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Forget adding Canada as the 51st state, give them California and we'll settle for 4

 

[sartre play]

WE all can agree that its a mess,
no matter what you believe
to much ugly infighting, To little UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

 

[struth]

The judge didn't deny the injuction. The hearing is schedule for tomorrow.

Now where in the order (repeated below) did the Judge deny anything in regards to the plaintiff. Granting the DOJ request to respond is NOT denying the petition.

WW

View attachment 1122014

Why is Axios lying to it's readers then?

And why do you keep posting us to a scheduling order for a hearing on their motion for a restraining order? and nothing about the immediate injunction that was request and Axios is reporting was denied? You know the topic of the thread?

 

[WorldWatcher]

Why is Axios lying to it's readers then?

You'd have to ask them. I just posted the Judges order.

And why do you keep posting us to a scheduling order for a hearing on their motion for a restraining order? and nothing about the immediate injunction that was request and Axios is reporting was denied? You know the topic of the thread?

Because the Judge HASN'T made a ruling on the merits, he's scheduled action to get brief so that he can make a ruling.

I'm trying to get people to think instead of going with the Title of an OP or a media article by going to the source. The Judge DID NOT deny the TRO request, he hasn't made a decision yet.

WW

 

[BULLDOG]

Aaahhhhhh
Look who's triggered.
You want an ice cream cone?
It always helped cornpop.

even now. You seem to think I'm triggered even when there is no reason to believe that. No rhyme or reason to your version of realty.