Judge Denies CA Gov. Newsom's request to stop Trump from deploying Marines to LA

Again...you responded to my post about the marines.

Its up to you to know what you’re responding to cum stain.
No I didn't, I literally responded to THAT post, and then when I called you out for being an idiot, you switched it to marines.

Is lying a prerequirment to be a dembot? It has to be, because you all lie to yourselves all the time
 
He denied Newsome's motion for an injunction to stop the deployment. Yes, he tossed it. Read.
He didn't deny the motion for injunction. He hasn't heard the arguments yet.

DOJ response is due in 2 hours, the California response to DOJ is due tomorrow morning and the hearing is scheduled for tomorrow afternoon.

I did read it, I'm the one that posted the order.

WW
.
.
.
1749646973619.webp
 
He didn't deny the motion for injunction. He hasn't heard the arguments yet.

DOJ response is due in 2 hours, the California response to DOJ is due tomorrow morning and the hearing is scheduled for tomorrow afternoon.

I did read it, I'm the one that posted the order.

WW
.
.
.
View attachment 1121976
He literally denied the notion for an emergency injunction I should say

Hence why the troops are being deployed and granted the trump admin motion to allow more time to reply to the petition from Cali
 
The judge denied a motion by Gavin Newsom to stop Trump from sending Marines to LA in his effort to quell the rioting in Los Angeles, which has been going on since late Friday night.


Time for President Trump to deploy Kyle Rittenhouse to the City of Angels to command the forces there against the libs.

The Illegals that the libs are defending are rapists, murderers and child molesters.

The kind that were in Kenosha during the Summer of Love.


Besides, the mere naming of Rittenhouse to the job would cause thousands of liberal heads to explode immediately as it would be so brilliant.
 
He literally denied the notion for an emergency injunction I should say

He didn't deny the motion, he order responses and scheduled a hearing.

Hence why the troops are being deployed and granted the trump admin motion to allow more time to reply to the petition from Cali

He may not be acting fast enough for California's purposes, but he did not deny the TRO.

We will find out tomorrow if it's granted or denied.

WW
 
Wouldn't you think the Ca. governor would be glad to see the Marines and end the looting and anarchy? What the hell is wrong with these people?

It's 100% about making Trump, i.e. their political opposition, look bad, it's as simple as that. It has nothing to do with morals, their beliefs, or any other noble cause, it's about maintaining their power at all costs.
 
He didn't deny the motion, he order responses and scheduled a hearing.



He may not be acting fast enough for California's purposes, but he did not deny the TRO.

We will find out tomorrow if it's granted or denied.

WW
Yes he denied the motion, he hasn’t ruled on petition and granted the trump admin motion to extend time to reply

Please read
 
Yes he denied the motion, he hasn’t ruled on petition and granted the trump admin motion to extend time to reply

Please read

No he didn't deny the motion.

He scheduled action.

What the results of the hearing tomorrow will be is TBD.

WW
.
.
.
.
1749649181039.webp
 
No he didn't deny the motion.

He scheduled action.

What the results of the hearing tomorrow will be is TBD.

WW
.
.
.
.
View attachment 1121984
No he denied their motion for an emergency injunction and granted trumps motion to extend time for their reply to the petition and then will schedule a full hearing.

What part of that don’t you get?? Can’t read? Or is it reading comprehension you struggle with?

Your link doesn’t address the motion or what’s in the OP
 
Not a problem. Much of reality is not believed by MAGA cult members. Nothing new to see here.
It is remarkable how people in vehicles on highways like the 101 have such restraint in not running over the insurrectionists. It is more the Progressive Socialist Communist political and legal vice lock that deters them as they will go to the gulags for life or get the death penalty.
 
No he denied their motion for an emergency injunction and granted trumps motion to extend time for their reply to the petition and then will schedule a full hearing.

What part of that don’t you get?? Can’t read? Or is it reading comprehension you struggle with?

Your link doesn’t address the motion or what’s in the OP

What part of the judge didn't toss or deny the motion do you not get?

The hearing is scheduled for TOMORROW, that's when the judge will decide.

My link is to the freaking judges order for the hearing and it says nothing about denying the request for a restraining order.

WW
 
What part of the judge didn't toss or deny the motion do you not get?

The hearing is scheduled for TOMORROW, that's when the judge will decide.

My link is to the freaking judges order for the hearing and it says nothing about denying the request for a restraining order.

WW
The part where you are wrong. He denied the notion for an emergency injuction. He then granted the admin motion for an extension to reply

Read the OP you idiot! It’s the topic of the thread

You keep posting a scheduling order to the petition and ignoring the topic. I agree it says nothing about the motion he tossed. It’s not at all relevant to the topic.
 
The part where you are wrong. He denied the notion for an emergency injuction. He then granted the admin motion for an extension to reply

Read the OP you idiot! It’s the topic of the thread

You keep posting a scheduling order to the petition and ignoring the topic. I agree it says nothing about the motion he tossed. It’s not at all relevant to the topic.

Read the judges order your idiot!!!

The Judge made ruling on the motion, the hearing is TOMORROW.

Granting the Governments motion to be able to respond is not denying the plaintiff's motion.

WW

1749650375507.webp
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom